Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- Political leaders and parties, including members of May’s own Conservative Party, have turned one of the world’s oldest democratic institutions into a basket case


Lessons from Brexit:

The Brexit debates in the UK Parliament are surreal. It is hard to believe the current incumbents, of the UK Commons, are working in the heart of modern democracy.

When the government decided to hold a referendum on Brexit, it consulted with the highest power in any democratic nation – the people. Following several months of intense political campaigning for and against, the people spoke. Leave the European Union. It is hurting us.

Some politicians kept acting as if they had a choice. Initially they focused on negotiating an exit deal. The minority government did so.

Opposition parties screamed: “Not good enough!”. Nothing would have been ‘good enough’ as many were opposed leaving the EU, and this was how they could throw a wrench in the works.

Opposition benches have managed to delay and stall an orderly and rational parting with the EU not because it is right, but because they can. They are not certain enough of their grounds to defeat the government and force a general election, so they continue with irresponsible demands.

MPs have forgotten that they are in breach of the nation’s highest court; the people of the United Kingdom. A public referendum is no less binding than a general election. The people have spoken. The decision to leave the EU was not made by Prime Minister May, but it is the duty of Parliament to obey the order.

The Opposition is on thin ice causing the government to miss exit deadlines. It has no valid reasons for doing so. It is so intent on blaming Theresa May for a referendum outcome, it is ignoring the people it was elected to serve.

Political leaders and parties -- including members of Ms. May’s own Conservative Party -- have turned one of the world’s oldest democratic institutions into a basket case. There is not one in the whole lot worthy of re-election. They have shown their colours and they are the Jolly Roger.

There are lessons for Canada in the UK debacle. One is that political parties are the ruination of democracy.


When political infighting is more important than the responsibilities of governance, democracy is doomed. Green Party Leader Elizabeth May has already hinted that she wants to follow the destructive and obstructive path that is tearing the UK parliament apart. She will do anything to obstruct a conservative minority following the next election. She too has flown the pirate flag and is unfit for office in a democracy.

Every parliamentarian, whether on the government or opposition benches has a duty to ensure that a government’s responsibilities are adequately and promptly carried out. The rest of it is widow dressing, allowable only as long as the fundamental responsibilities are dealt with.

Our MPs spend all their time on window dressing and ignore their responsibilities.

Playing political games is more entertaining than the dreary duties of responsible governance. Saving the world is more attractive than wrestling with domestic issues and responsibilities.

The pretense that our federal government is a step above the provinces is nonsense. The federal and provincial governments have different powers and responsibilities. For decades, the federal government has blurred lines by encroaching on provincial jurisdictions -- that is not good governance.

The federal government must mind its responsibilities and leave the provinces to mind theirs. That would remove many of the conflicts unconstitutional federal mucking about has created.  

John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more