We gave $10 million to a tried, convicted, and imprisoned terrorist. After being destroyed by his own government, how much are we going to give to Mark Norman, who spent decades serving his country?
Alan Forseth ~~ Kamloops, BC ~~ May 8th, 2019
Things that make you go hmmmmmmm.
“On
April 9th the House voted on our Conservative motion to support Vice-Admiral
Mark Norman”, commented Conservative MP Dan Albas. “The
NDP joined with us in voting yes”.
Meantime, while Prime Minister Justin Trudeau
whipped his Liberal caucus to vote no on the conservative motion ... “Some Liberal MPs were conspicuously absent
for this vote, despite having just been in their seats for the vote prior”.
Watching the actions of
Justin Trudeau’s government ... the actions of the PMO’s Office ... and those
of the Privy Council, in recent months, including the smearing of Vice-Admiral
Mark Norman, I want to say, “We can't get
rid of Trudeau The Hypocrite soon enough”.
Given the way he treats
people, I have to believe he has no conscience, no scruples, and no understanding
of the chaos he creates all around him.
Two and a half years ago Norman was given the role of Vice Chief of
Canada’s Defense staff ... then on January of 2017 he was temporarily removed
form that post ... and six months later permanently removed.
As many will recall, that removal was based on allegations that he had
released government information that might affect
the procurement of naval supply ships, which potentially constituted a breach
of trust.
Today, a story in the
National Post this morning indicated that ... the newly exonerated
Vice-Admiral Mark Norman says he was alarmed by the persistent belief among
senior government officials that he was guilty, and that their false
assumptions took a significant financial and emotional toll on him and on his
family.
Meantime
the Globe and Mail stated that if the trial had gone ahead, it would have ... likely featured potentially damaging
evidence and testimony for the Liberal government. After coming to power in
October, 2015, the Liberal cabinet temporarily put the contract with the Davie
shipyard in Quebec on hold ... Norman’s defence team has struggled through a
series of pretrial motions to obtain access to classified documents from the
government, sparking accusations in the House of Commons that the Liberals were
hiding key information related to the case ...
Hide, deflect, smear,
intimidation, insert innuendo and doubt into the minds of Canadians. That seems to be the Trudeau way given what
has happened not just in former Vice-Admiral Mark Norman’s case ... but also in
the case of Jody Wilson-Raybould, and others.
Foresight perhaps that a
reporter noted that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s 2017 Canada Day comment
that ... “We are strong not in spite of
our differences, but because of them” ... should have instead been ... “We are stronger not because of our
differences, but because we extinguish
them”.
On Facebook today (May 8th), Sean
Smith commented that Admiral Norman ... was
basically wrongfully accused, his reputation dragged through the mud, his
career in ruins, his personal finances depleted in his defence......all because
of a political party was looking for a way to deflect attention away from some of
their questionable procurement processes.
Smith continued, “If we are giving $10 Million to a convicted terrorist who was tried and
imprisoned by another country, how much are we going to give to a Canadian
Citizen (who spent decades serving his country in the Canadian Forces) for
being destroyed by his own government?”
Today as well, Central Okanagan - Similkameen – Nicola
MP Dan Albas asked two questions:
1) Was there political pressure from PMO to
drop this case?
2) What tipped the scale? Was it pure
political optics, or did the government learn something that blew up their
case?
“Either
way, Vice Admiral Mark Norman’s legal fees should be covered by the
government”,
Albas stated.
From the sponsorship /
Shawinigate / ad-scam scandal of the Jean Chretien government ... to Justin’s
own father, Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau who in the opinion of many was
extremely arrogant, who caused the frustration of
Western Canada due to his centralization of power in Ottawa, along with his
much-hated National Energy program ... the Liberal Party of Canada seems to
abound with self-righteousness and under-handedness.
That self-righteousness
has led consecutive Liberal governments to force MPS to simply act as seals in
Parliament, and saying “YES” (at least until recently), to every motion brought
forward by government.
It has caused them to
hide and deflect issues that Canadians would be dismayed to know ... and which
have once uncovered -- it’s allowed them to run up debt to levels that no one
could ever imagine. -- and it will bring the government of Justin Trudeau to its
knees when it is kicked out of power following the up-coming general election
in October.
A New York Times
Editorial in 2005 remarked that, “When power and leadership come to
politician’s incapable of handling either, the results can be disastrous”.
History will show that
the second go-round of Trudeaumania, through Justin, will indeed be
disastrous. Let history not also show
that we as Canadians, gave him a second term in office.
Comments
Post a Comment