ADAM OLSEN -- This is just paranoid, conspiratorial fear-mongering you say! The result of the over-active mind of someone listening to too many podcasts
I had an interesting conversation with a couple of friends about the
threat of digital intrusions. How far will you let the perception of convenience
justify your personal vulnerability? Is it too much work to care about how
corporations are using the data we trade for access to their latest time saving
/ consuming application or service?
Does it require to much of our bandwidth to actually go back and limit
personal access?
Maybe it's easier to believe that there isn’t possibly anything in your
life that they will find interesting.
Are they looking for interesting? Are they seeking anything in
particular? What if they are only harvesting data points to sell or lease them?
Or they could be building a digital avatar of you that gains definition with
every input.
These are all important questions that I fear too few of us are asking.
Checking the box
Another aspect, of the business of data, is that what they are
harvesting now could be used for something different later. That is the problem
with the evolving culture of privacy policies. They are so difficult to
understand that we mostly forgo reading them. When was the last time you agreed
to what was in the privacy policy? Let me put this another way. When you check
the box, are you agreeing to the privacy policy, or are you agreeing that you
want the perceived benefits of the service, which you cannot access unless you
check the box?
Privacy policies change and we have to update our agreement with them.
When they do, what has changed? Why? What is the difference between the new
agreement and the old one? Do we even know?
This comes up again for me after reading a Global News article about the explosion
of DNA collection and testing. We buy the sales pitch because deep down we all
want to know who we are and where we come from. We are curious about the
genetic material, the code, that makes each one of us our beautiful unique
selves.
Collecting points
Think of each privacy policy you sign as a data set. Each set is
harvesting in real time data points. It might be a collection of markers from
your mobile phone’s health or habit application. Or it is the purchase history
of your credit card. Throw in your web search and browser history.
Independently, this information is only a bit useful -- but once there are
sets layering on top of each other and now add a person's genetic
information as well...
The level of exposure to the real-world is incalculable.
It does not require much of an imagination to create scenarios where
countless remarkably accurate digital avatars of you are running endless
simulations and generating a prediction of what you did seconds before you did
it. Consider the impact that such a predictive capacity can have on influencing
or outright manipulating the decisions you make. What could be done with the
information of what you are likely to do or the set of circumstances that need
to be in place to create a different outcome. Free will?
This is just paranoid, conspiratorial fear-mongering you say!
The result of the over-active mind of someone listening to too many
podcasts?
Perhaps.
It is not my desire to fear-monger or engage in conspiracy theories. If
I can craft these ideas on my mobile phone while on my Sunday walk, then imagine
what sophisticated, profit-motivated computer engineers do with these
postulations. They are opportunities to grow their corporations' market cap.
Hearing footsteps
Our decisions on how to protect our digital selves make us vulnerable.
It’s probably because we can’t hear the footsteps echoing in the alley behind us
... or the hairs on the back of our necks are not standing up because we cannot
sense a threat lurking in the shadows.
Where are the shadows?
They are so abstract we do not have the skills to even perceive them. We
are like toddlers stumbling out of the cave surrounded by Sabre-tooth tigers.
My goal with this post is to encourage all of us to develop these new
skills to perceive danger quickly and sharpen our instincts. I have no idea
what race we are running but I am fairly sure “they” have a head start.
I think it is important at this point to acknowledge my role as an
elected person with the responsibility of regulating and enforcing the
protection of the public interest.
Governments have been slow to respond and
even slower to act and this needs to change. So, I also scribe this post as a
political marker as well, noting that we must do much better in this area!
Adam Olsen ... is a Green
Party Member of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia for Saanich North
and the Islands. Born in Victoria, BC in 1976, Adam has lived, worked and
played his entire life on the Saanich Peninsula. He is a member of Tsartlip
First Nation (W̱JOȽEȽP), where he
and his wife, Emily, are raising their two children, Silas and Ella.
Comments
Post a Comment