Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ADAM OLSEN -- Despite different rhetoric Horgan government clings to decades old approach to Indigenous relations

 

The source of uncertainty about lands and resources in British Columbia is rooted in the failure of successive governments to uphold the rights of Indigenous peoples.


 

Let’s be clear – conflict and contention over the land base doesn’t come from honouring human rights, it comes from denying and violating them. For decades British Columbia has followed a policy of litigating about whether Indigenous rights even exist, and negotiating in long, expensive, and unprincipled ways that rarely have outcomes. The result is nothing is resolved. And the Horgan government is no different.

 

Europeans arrived in North America and claimed the land was empty, with no humans living here. This was the doctrine of terra nullius – nobody’s land. Paired with the Doctrine of Discovery, which goes back to 1494 when the Treaty of Tordesillas determined that non-Christian lands could be colonized, Europeans asserted sovereignty to the land and resources that now make up Canada.

 

Today, of course, we reject these doctrines for what they are – racist and destructive. But they remain at the foundation of what led to the formation of British Columbia. And they remain embedded in the laws, policies, and practices of government today.

 

We see this playing out regarding old growth forests. For months we have been calling on Premier John Horgan to implement all the recommendations of his old growth review panel. Thousands of British Columbians have joined in the call to protect the last remaining stands of ancient, monumental old growth forests.

 

Premier Horgan and Minister of Forests, Lands, and Natural Resource Operations Katrine Conroy have been claiming they are doing the work needed to protect these trees. Unfortunately, the Premier and Minister have been talking out of both sides of their mouth.

 

On one hand, Premier Horgan is stating he recognizes Indigenous rights and title. On the other hand, his Minister of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation Murray Rankin, is advancing the same old models of forestry agreements put in place by the BC Liberals over a decade ago.

 

These agreements are based on the denial of Indigenous rights – saying rights are “asserted”, not accepting they exist, and not recognizing that Nations have any ownership in lands and resources.

 

Premier Horgan talks about Indigenous sovereignty, rights, and title. Yet the Attorney General continues to advance the same litigation positions that Crown governments have taken for decades. Right now, as I write this, BC taxpayers are funding their government to argue in court in multiple pieces of litigation something different than what the government says publicly: that certain Indigenous people do not exist as a people, that their rights have been extinguished – if they ever had any in the first place – and that even if there are rights, they are effectively meaningless.

 

Why does this happen? Because in its laws, policies, and practices, British Columbia is still denying Indigenous title and rights.

 

In Budget Estimates I asked the Attorney General about this. (See our 30 minute exchange here.) He said that until title has been negotiated in treaty, or decided by the Courts through litigation, the Crown maintains control of the land and resources.

 

This is the old position of denial. It is also not what the Supreme Court of Canada has said. The Courts have been explicit. Title does not exist because an agreement or court says it does. Title exists because of the prior use and occupation of First Nations. Title exists where it exists – because of the history and contemporary reality of the relationship of Indigenous peoples to these lands and resources.

 

The responsibility of government is to reconcile with the pre-existing sovereignty of Indigenous peoples. To say that before that occurs, we need to litigate or have a treaty is a denial of title and rights.

 

The government also knows that treaty negotiations have languished in our province. Negotiation tables have been open for decades with only a few treaties getting to a final agreement. They have been frustrating and expensive, with little hope of success because of Crown policies and mandates. The treaty process in British Columbia and Canada is yet another sad reflection of colonialism.

 

In this policy of inaction – through grinding, endless treaty negotiations and expensive, divisive, and endless litigation – this government is behaving the same as governments past. It comes to First Nations with an interim benefits agreement, with the purpose of securing Crown opportunities to continue harvesting the resources off the land that have been at the centre of the dispute for the past century and a half.

 

These are the same approaches and agreements that that the former colleagues of Minister Conroy and Minister Rankin spoke passionately against when they were in opposition.

 

Former Forests Minister Doug Donaldson called them “take it or leave it” agreements. In 2014, Donaldson said, “As we know, many First Nations communities are in very, very difficult socio-economic times.”

 

He continued, “I think First Nations for decades have seen natural resources off unceded territories leave their area by the truckload, by the trainload, and then there’s an opportunity presented by the provincial government with a take-it-or-leave-it approach to say, “Here’s a percentage of that that you can have,” of course, it’s going to make a difference in some people’s lives within the community. Let’s not discount that, but the fact is that it’s based on a history of a very uneven and unlevel playing field.”

 

It is disturbing that Premier Horgan knows this yet continues the same practice. Yes, with different rhetoric. But the same practice.

 

At the end of my exchange with the Attorney General in Budget Estimates he said the situation is not as “grim” as I have outlined. It depends on your perspective Minister.

 

The historic and current landscape is grim, in fact, it’s worse than grim, it’s slippery, it’s slimy, frankly Minister, it’s grotesque.

 

Adam Olsen (SȾHENEP) ... is the MLA-elect for Saanich North and the Islands and member of the B.C. Green Caucus. He was first elected to the British Columbia Legislative Assembly in May 2017 and re-elected in October 2020.

 

Born in Victoria, BC, Adam has lived, worked and played his entire life on the Saanich Peninsula. He is a member of Tsartlip First Nation (W̱JOȽEȽP), where he and his wife, Emily, are raising their two children, Silas and Ella.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It seems the call for blood donors is being responded to, however ... “This effort is a marathon, not a sprint” says Canadian Blood Services

A week and a half ago I wrote the commentary ... “ While the national inventory is currently strong, an increase in blood donor cancellations is a warning sign of potential challenges to maintaining a health inventory of blood ” It was written as a result of talk about a potential blood shortage that would occur if people stopped donating due to the COVID-19 virus. It seems the call to Canadians was responded to, however, as I was told this afternoon ... “ T his effort is a marathon, not a sprint ”. As it now stands now, donors are able to attend clinics which are held in Vancouver (2), Victoria, Surrey, and in Kelowna, so I asked if there any plans to re-establish traveling clinics to others communities - for example in Kamloops, Prince George, Prince Rupert, Revelstoke or Cranbrook, and perhaps further north at perhaps Ft. St. John? According to Communications Lead Regional Public Affairs Specialist Marcelo Dominguez, Canadian Blood Services is still on

FEDLSTED -- Rules will have to relax-- the question is how and when

The media has created a fervour over the mathematical models that allegedly help governments predict the future of Coronavirus infections in the general population. Mathematical modelling has limited use and value. We need to understand is that the data available on Coronavirus (COVID-19) infections in Canada is far too small for statistical reliability. The data available for the whole world is useless due to variables in how nations responded to Coronavirus infections. There is no commonality in steps taken to combat virus spread and no similarity in the age demographics of world nations, so the numbers you see on the daily tracking of world infections are not useful in developing a model of infection rates that can be relied on. Mathematical models of the future spread of Coronavirus are better than nothing, but not a whole lot better.  Mathematical models must include assumptions on virus spreads, and various factors involved. As they are used in projections, a small erro

AARON GUNN -- He is, at his core, an ideologue, meaning the facts of any particular issue don’t actually matter

Ben Isitt - City Councillor and Regional Director Victoria City Council and its resident-genius Ben Isitt is back with another dumb idea. Introducing a motion to ban the horse-drawn carriages that have coloured Victoria’s downtown streets for decades, calling them “an outdated mode of transportation”. Are you serious?   No one is actually commuting by horse and carriage. They are here for tourists and residents alike to interact with world-class animals and discover the magic and history of our provincial capital. It’s part of what gives Victoria its charm. And the truth is these horses are treated better than anywhere else in the world. They probably live better lives than many British Columbians.   And talk to anyone who works with these horses and they’ll all tell you the exact same thing: this is what the horses love to do. This is what they were bred for and trained for. This is what gives their lives purpose and meaning. But maybe we shouldn’t be su

Labels

Show more