Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- Our behaviour doesn’t indicate we found the residential school system repulsive. We claimed ignorance and, when confronted with the truth, blame others

 


The memory of how wrong the residential school concept was must never be erased. We treated Indigenous people with contempt rather than dignity and respect.

No compensation can remedy taking children from their homes by force and attempting to reprogram their natural heritage.

Many expressions of grief following the revelation of remains found on the Kamloops residential school property are expressions of guilt for events over a century old over which we have no control. Provincial politicians are posturing but cannot fix the problems. Relations with indigenous people are in federal jurisdiction.   

Abuse and atrocities catalogued by survivors are authentic, believable, horrific, and unacceptable. It proves again that our veneer of civilization is thin and fragile.

In the 1890 to 1920 period, public standards and values were much different. Life was brutal, cruel, and short. Modern medicine was in its infancy. Child mortality rates were in the 45 percent range. Almost half of all children did not reach adulthood. Women were still considered chattels and did not have the right to hold public office or vote federally until 1918.  

The non-indigenous public has ignored residential schools for decades. They did not have children taken away, and their families disrupted. That was still the case fifteen days ago. Our behaviour does not indicate that we found the residential school system repulsive. We claimed ignorance and, when confronted with the truth, blame others.       

There is no proof of a mass grave in Kamloops. There is a graveyard which is not the same thing. There is no evidence of genocide; we don’t know over what period deaths occurred. We must proceed with dignity and respect for survivors and families of those who died. Emotional accusations are not helpful.

The contention that records of deceased students are unavailable is dubious. Schools were contracted to teach students and were paid by enrollment. Both schools and the government had copies. Who wrote or cashed the cheques? That is where the records are.        

Apologizing on behalf of people long dead will not assuage grief or bring anyone back from the dead.

The tasks at hand are to accept the evidence, work together to establish what reparations are needed by those injured, establish what supports are required to allow those harmed to rebuild what they have lost and provide supports. If we can accomplish that openly and respectfully, we are on the way to reconciliation.

We must insist governments account for their actions and facilitate reconciliation. They have lost the right to lead. The path to healing requires that we treat every Canadian with dignity and respect. One hundred fifty-four years of avoiding accountability, coverups, discrimination, and evasions must end. We need action, not talk. Time is up.

We must not remove statues of public figures or erase their names from streets and buildings. If we do, we erase their flaws. Their part in the residential school system will soon be forgotten, along with memories of the atrocities we claim to despise.   

We must link their names to their involvement with the residential school horror and make that a part of our history. We learn from our mistakes, and it is never too late to learn the dangers of tyranny directed at one race. The damage must be repaired at once and never repeated as we are all vulnerable to abuse through the misuse of government powers.

Governments created the residential school system in the name of all Canadians. They govern on our behalf. Governments that will abuse an identifiable group are unfit and a danger to every free person. We cannot claim ignorance of government activities and express anger long afterward when we discover inappropriate actions.

Demanding apologies from the Catholic Church is a deflection. The government created the policy and program and contracted with churches to carry it out. The government ordered that children be seized and had them conveyed to residential school facilities. While that did not give churches license to abuse, the government is still the primary instigator.

Our governments have discriminated against Chinese, German, Italian, Japanese, Jewish, Polish, and Ukrainian people. Discrimination against Indigenous people is ongoing.

Our government has refused to deal with indigenous estrangement for over a century.

 

If we want these problems resolved, we have to pay attention and insist on better performance. We, the people, are not spectators; we are the government. If we fail to monitor the actions of our representatives and demand accountability, we have failed our civic duty.


John Feldsted ... is a political commentator, consultant, and strategist. He makes his home in Winnipeg, Manitoba.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more