Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

WorkSafeBC says they are committed to sound financial management, meantime Liberal leader Andrew Wilkinson wants to know what happened to the 2.9-BILLION-dollar surplus

For those who missed the story, released by WorkSafe BC yesterday, it seems they are expecting a substantial financial loss-- just how much however, is the question many are asking.

While WorkSafeBC says they are ... committed to sound financial management in order to ensure the long-term financial sustainability of the system for workers and employers, the BC Liberals are asking BC Labour Minister Harry Bains how the NDP government has ...
lost almost the entire estimated $2.9-billion surplus from WorkSafeBC in just the last few weeks.

So, is there a sound financial footing for WorkSafeBC – or is it facing financial instability?

The statement, released from WorkSafeBC over the weekend, stated that indeed the COVID-19 situation has resulted in a lot of economic uncertainty. However, to increase financial stability (and avoid rate volatility during economic and investment downturns) they retain what they call a ... reasonable level of assets over liabilities.

Further, the release stated, “Currently, WorkSafeBC continues to exceed its target funding level, despite the volatility”.

Liberal leader Andrew Wilkinson however is
calling on John Horgan’s NDP government to tell British Columbians what happened to that $2.9 billion surplus.

"People all across BC have been sacrificing to help stop the spread of COVID-19 and now as they head back to work, they're learning that the agency in charge of ensuring they're safe doesn't even have enough money to help buy gloves or masks”, said Wilkinson, who then continued:

"This is unacceptable at the best of times, but as people return to work and help rebuild our economy, the timing of this failure couldn't be worse."

Currently, for the purposes of contingency planning, WorkSafeBC’s actuaries are considering multiple possible scenarios (financial needs and risks), based on what they are call ... widely varying economic forecasts.

Again, according to WorkSafeBC, their long-term planning, including the setting of assessment rates, is based on a smoothed approach to financial valuation and projection.

That ‘smoothed approach’ apparently means that ... significant investment gains or losses are generally taken into account over a period of years, rather than having the immediate impact that the fair value financial statements might suggest.

Still, a 2.9-billion-dollar loss, impacts the Liberal’s suggestion that
WorkSafe BC's surplus be used help small business owners with the cost of personal protective equipment (PPE), so they can keep their employees and customers safe.

We now know why the NDP rejected this idea - they lost the surplus”, said Wilkinson.

"The people of BC, and especially the people who paid premiums to WorkSafe, are entitled to know who lost $3 billion in a matter of weeks," added Wilkinson. "Where is the accountability? The NDP need to answer for this immediately."

Who’s right ... how much money has been lost ... is it a loss that fits with possible financial scenarios planned for by WorkSafeBC ... and will it impact workers relying on WorkSafeBC?

As Rick Riccardo would say when Lucy would screw something up ... “You got some splainin to do


Popular posts from this blog

THE SIDEWINDER -- Just quit your constant damned whining and do something positive about it

  Living in a democracy is a wonderful thing, but it comes with responsibilities such as voting and being involved. When the dust settled on Saturdays (October 24 th ) BC election, less than two thirds of the eligible voters * took the time to vote - but the loudest bitchers will probably be among the more than one third of voters who sat on their asses and complained about how all politicians are crooks, etc. How many of you constant whiners have ever done anything close to becoming involved; or do you just like sniveling to hear your own voice? Are you one the arseholes who likes to take advantage of everything our democracy has to offer, without ever contributing anything? And I don't want to listen to your crap about paying taxes, blah, blah, blah. There's more to making democracy work than simply voting and then sitting back and let others carry the ball for you. Too many people seem unwilling to get involved - and follow-up - to make sure elected po

AARON GUNN -- He is, at his core, an ideologue, meaning the facts of any particular issue don’t actually matter

Ben Isitt - City Councillor and Regional Director Victoria City Council and its resident-genius Ben Isitt is back with another dumb idea. Introducing a motion to ban the horse-drawn carriages that have coloured Victoria’s downtown streets for decades, calling them “an outdated mode of transportation”. Are you serious?   No one is actually commuting by horse and carriage. They are here for tourists and residents alike to interact with world-class animals and discover the magic and history of our provincial capital. It’s part of what gives Victoria its charm. And the truth is these horses are treated better than anywhere else in the world. They probably live better lives than many British Columbians.   And talk to anyone who works with these horses and they’ll all tell you the exact same thing: this is what the horses love to do. This is what they were bred for and trained for. This is what gives their lives purpose and meaning. But maybe we shouldn’t be su


I have just struggled through Cheryl Ashlie's column ( MacDuff’s Call: A political novice with a sizeable ego ), in the Sept. 22 edition of The Maple Ridge News. To say the least, Ashlie's comments are naive and show just how totally out of touch she has become with political reality. Ashlie lauds the decision of Darryl Plecas to accept John Horgan's invitation to become the Speaker of the House, a move described by almost everyone else as self-serving and a betrayal of the trust of the constituents who voted for him. Ashlie claims Plecas' turncoat move will help provide good governance but in making this claim, she fails to explain how he will achieve this lofty goal.


Show more