Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED – No one asks, ‘Who claims that black lives don’t matter?’. There is no answer because the slogan is not based on fact or reason


I have watched the ‘black lives matter’ “protests” in our major Canadian cities with astonishment. The concept is thoughtlessly mimicked from US racial strife with an anarchist background. Those in the vanguard of Canadian protests have no knowledge of history or Canada’s role in freeing slaves.

No one asks: “Who claims that black lives don’t matter?” There is no answer because the slogan is not based on fact or reason.

Slavery was abolished in Upper Canada (now Ontario) in 1793, 227 years ago. In 1834, slavery was abolished in the entire British Empire (including the Canadian colonies) 186 years ago and 33 years prior to Confederation.

William Wilberforce, a member of the House of Commons as an independent, became intricately involved in the abolition of the slave trade in Britain. His conversion to Evangelical Christianity in 1784 played a key role in interesting him in this social reform. William Wilberforce's Slave Trade Act 1807 abolished the slave trade in the British Empire. It was not until the Slavery Abolition Act 1833 that the institution finally was abolished, but on a gradual basis. Since land owners in the British West Indies were losing their unpaid labourers, they received compensation totalling £20 million.

The Royal Navy established the West Africa Squadron (or Preventative Squadron) at substantial expense in 1808 after Parliament passed the Slave Trade Act of 1807. The squadron's task was to suppress the Atlantic slave trade by patrolling the coast of West Africa, preventing the slave trade by force of arms, including the interception of slave ships from Europe, the United States, the Barbary pirates, West Africa and the Ottoman Empire.

The Church of England was implicated in slavery. Slaves were owned by the Anglican Church's Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts (SPGFP), which had sugar plantations in the West Indies. When slaves were emancipated by Act of the British Parliament in 1834, the British government paid compensation to slave owners. Among those they paid were the Bishop of Exeter and three business colleagues, who received compensation for 665 slaves.


The £20 million Great Britain paid to free saves in the West Indies would be the equivalent of about $3 billion US today. The protestors are oblivious of Canada’s major role in the Underground Railroad:

The Underground Railroad was a secret network of abolitionists (people who wanted to abolish slavery). They helped African Americans escape from enslavement in the American South to free Northern states or to Canada. The Underground Railroad was the largest anti-slavery freedom movement in North America. It brought between 30,000 and 40,000 fugitives to British North America (now Canada).

A provision in the 1793 Act to Limit Slavery stated that any enslaved person who reached Upper Canada became free upon arrival.

This encouraged a small number of enslaved African Americans in search of freedom to enter Canada, primarily without help. Word that freedom could be had in Canada spread further following the War of 1812. The enslaved servants of US military officers from the South brought back word that there were free “Black men in red coats” in British North America. Arrivals of freedom-seekers in Upper Canada increased dramatically after 1850 with the passage of the American Fugitive Slave Act. It empowered slave catchers to pursue fugitives in Northern states.


The Underground Railroad was created in the early 19th century by a group of abolitionists based mainly in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Within a few decades, it had grown into a well-organized and dynamic network. The term “Underground Railroad” began to be used in the 1830s. By then, an informal covert network to help fugitive slaves had already taken shape.

The Underground Railroad was not an actual railroad and it did not run on railway tracks. It was a complex, clandestine network of people and safe houses that helped persons enslaved in Southern plantations reach freedom in the North. The network was maintained by abolitionists who were committed to human rights and equality. They offered help to fleeing slaves. Their ranks included free Blacks, fellow enslaved persons, White and Indigenous sympathizers, Quakers, Methodists, Baptists, inhabitants of urban centre and farmers, men and women, Americans and Canadians.

Black Lives Matter” and “White Privilege” are slogans created by leftist, wh

ite American university anarchists bent on creating a race war to destabilize the US government. Wisconsin university professor Bernardine Dohrn, co-founder of the Weather Underground and an avowed Marxist said, "White youth must choose sides now. They must either fight on the side of the oppressed or be on the side of the oppressor."

Picking up slogans without historical context or awareness of their origins is unwise. Slogans are devoid of intellect as they are designed to appeal to our emotions. Thousands of people have been willingly hoodwinked.

Note that no mention is made of the bloody civil war the US went through to free slaves there. There is much more to the black lives matter movement than some incidents of police brutality.

I don’t condone police brutality or unwarranted killings and accept that we endure racism in police ranks. However, the brutality is not confined to blacks, or indigenous people. Brutes and bullies are not particular about who they victimize. The majority of police officers are ethical and honest. So are the majority of blacks. indigenous people and others. I reject the concept that blacks and other races do not practice discrimination. They too

have battered halos.

Every race, and ethnic group, has a share dishonest, discriminatory and unethical people. Every race has its share of brutes and bullies. Yelling ‘black lives matter’ does not excuse these elements or magnify the undesirable elements of others. Yelling that back people have suffered 400 years of oppression in Canada is not true.

Emotional reactions do not lead to rational and workable solutions. Arrogance, confrontation, and a lack of manners and respect

are not racist but have become common in our relationships. If we cannot discuss and debate issues civilly and respectfully, we cannot communicate effectively. If we cannot communicate civilly and do not respect one another we cannot resolve common problems.

One does not have to a genius to understand that defunding -- or disbanding -- police forces will result in neighbourhoods being taken over by criminal elements as has already happened in Seattle. Those objectives are anarchist/Marxist elements at work.

They know they cannot succeed in an orderly and lawful environment, so their aim is to create chaos.



John Feldsted ... is a political commentator, consultant, and strategist. He males his home in Winnipeg, Manitoba.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more