Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

RAFAEL POSADA -- I’ve decided to be one of the people at the heart of change. Are you?




That was always my answer when people asked me where I stood politically. For one reason: disappointment.


When I taught political science, I asked my students when you think about politics, which words come to mind?


Most had negative undertones: division, conflict, deception, power, status. Canadian political parties have been unable to resonate with young people, who—like most of us—care about issues, not parties.


Growing up in a family that argued politics over the dinner table, against the common advice, and believed in the importance of policy changes, it was natural for me to study public policy. Yet, I grew disappointed in many politicians and the political arena.


Not all, but many politicians have created a rhetoric fueled with animosity, prejudice, and misinformation that has stalled progress. In my opinion, that rhetoric exacerbates discrimination and allows bigotry to prevail.


So, does that make politics bad? No, we just need to rebuild how we do politics because being apolitical is not a solution.


Politics needs to be about public engagement, representation, and dialogue to make decisions that take us forward. It needs to be about bringing different perspectives, without tolerating intolerance, and creating an environment that embraces our differences and empowers innovation.


I think a few things need to happen to accomplish this type of politics. We need to re-envision a more inclusive, collaborative, and compassionate political arena. One that moves away from divisive party politics that prevent us from finding consensus and achieving an equitable, sustainable, and thriving future.


We need to build a government that works collaboratively to eliminate the disadvantages that have left many behind, and instead implement equity of opportunity to achieve a fair society. It must not think in short, fixed terms, but acts on the existential socio-economic and environmental threats of our time; one that is founded with innovation, technology, and most importantly, people as the resources with which to build hot-wired economies.


This is a call to action for my fellow British Columbians who may feel the same way. Because, as a young voter within the 61 percent of British Columbians who are under 39 years old, I hope to build a life in this province. I care about affordability, sustainability, and productivity, three indicators that can determine my future in B.C.


I discovered quickly that apolitical was too easy of a stance to take, I still got to complain about the changes I wanted but it was an excuse to not do anything to create the necessary change.


Nobody was more surprised than me when I recently connected with an aspiring politician who, for the first time in a long time, made me hopeful that we can do politics differently in BC.


That’s why, I stand with Val Litwin for BC Liberal leadership to take the first step forward and redefine what success looks like for British Columbia. However, this goal goes beyond parties.


Let’s demand strong governments and oppositions that hold them accountable.


Let’s demand transparency, accountability, and a more collaborative political arena that creates progress on issues we care about.


Let’s demand leaders who believe in “action, not words. Impact, not spin,” as Val has said.


Let’s demand a fiscally responsible government that makes decisions based on data yet understands how to address the pressing socio-economic and environmental issues of our time.


All of that requires serious, decisive action. Val is a doer who understands the connection between people, the environment, and the economy. “Any government that fails to sincerely place people at the heart of what they do is no longer electable,” he has said.


Instead, I’ve decided to be one of the people at the heart of change. Are you?



Rafael Posada … is a young entrepreneur and policy consultant. He is supporting Val Litwin’s BC Liberal leadership campaign.


Popular posts from this blog

It seems the call for blood donors is being responded to, however ... “This effort is a marathon, not a sprint” says Canadian Blood Services

A week and a half ago I wrote the commentary ... “ While the national inventory is currently strong, an increase in blood donor cancellations is a warning sign of potential challenges to maintaining a health inventory of blood ” It was written as a result of talk about a potential blood shortage that would occur if people stopped donating due to the COVID-19 virus. It seems the call to Canadians was responded to, however, as I was told this afternoon ... “ T his effort is a marathon, not a sprint ”. As it now stands now, donors are able to attend clinics which are held in Vancouver (2), Victoria, Surrey, and in Kelowna, so I asked if there any plans to re-establish traveling clinics to others communities - for example in Kamloops, Prince George, Prince Rupert, Revelstoke or Cranbrook, and perhaps further north at perhaps Ft. St. John? According to Communications Lead Regional Public Affairs Specialist Marcelo Dominguez, Canadian Blood Services is still on

FEDLSTED -- Rules will have to relax-- the question is how and when

The media has created a fervour over the mathematical models that allegedly help governments predict the future of Coronavirus infections in the general population. Mathematical modelling has limited use and value. We need to understand is that the data available on Coronavirus (COVID-19) infections in Canada is far too small for statistical reliability. The data available for the whole world is useless due to variables in how nations responded to Coronavirus infections. There is no commonality in steps taken to combat virus spread and no similarity in the age demographics of world nations, so the numbers you see on the daily tracking of world infections are not useful in developing a model of infection rates that can be relied on. Mathematical models of the future spread of Coronavirus are better than nothing, but not a whole lot better.  Mathematical models must include assumptions on virus spreads, and various factors involved. As they are used in projections, a small erro

When necessary – and only when necessary – the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program can attach (garnish) wages

Alan Forseth ~~ Kamloops, BC ~~ May 15th Earlier this week (Monday May 13 th ) the BC government announced it would be establishing a new Crown agency to oversee the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program (FMEP).   They indicated that on or before the end of October, the provision of family maintenance services would transition from a contracted service provider, to the newly created Crown agency. Apparently, this was to ensure that family maintenance enforcement services for vulnerable British Columbians continue uninterrupted. Seeing this story, reminded me of a woman ( we’ll call her Mary Brown ) who had email me some time b ack about this very thing, and questions she had about how maintenance enforcement was imposed and enforced. She said to me, “ I’m just curious if you can get any statistics of the homeless men and woman, that have children, that they are paying family maintenance in support of their children”.  “I am not about to sugg


Show more