Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

BCs new better beverage tax means ... NO tax on that big caramel-mocha-frampa-cappa-coffee ... but YES to a bottle of water


USED WITH PERMISSION of the author, BC Director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, Kris Sims


The British Columbia government is using a seven per cent tax to make you make better beverage decisions. But study hard because this multiple-choice test isn’t easy.

The tax hits pop. Obvious, right? But it also hits pop that doesn’t have sugar, such as diet pop and fancy pop sweetened with stevia. What about that big caramel-mocha-frampa-cappa-coffee with the quadruple pump of hazelnut syrup and whipped cream with sprinkles? There’s lots of sugar, but no tax. And, for the bonus question, if you’re at the vending machine and pick water, you win, right? Nope – the sugar tax hits that water too.

Here’s the kicker: studies show taxes won’t make you skinnier, but they do make governments a lot of money.

B.C. Finance Minister Carole James announced the new pop tax during the 2020 budget presentation. The sweetened drinks tax will pour $37 million out of taxpayers’ wallets and into the brimming tankards of government.

This new tax is fizzing over with problems.


While B.C.’s new seven per cent tax on sweetened drinks doesn’t apply to expensive sugary coffee drinks, it inexplicably does apply to other drinks that contain zero sugar


Pop taxes don’t work as advertised. They’re supposed to reduce consumption of pop and sugar – but they don’t.

Mexico tried doing this in 2014. For a short time after the national tax was introduced, pop consumption dipped. Soon, however, it bubbled back up again to pre-tax levels.

Borders can also be a problem for the sugar sheriffs. Costco parking lots prove people drive to get deals. And people drive to beat taxes too.

When Philadelphia tried a pop tax in 2017 it backfired. Its pop tax hit the downtown core, but not the suburbs. Those who could afford cars dodged the tax by driving to the ‘burbs and loading up on the tax-free sodas. Only lower-income people in the inner city paid the tax.

Some of the inner-city grocery stores couldn’t absorb the loss of the business and closed. These downtown stores were often the only source of fresh fruits and vegetables. When they closed, poor people had less access to good groceries.

People in B.C. routinely cross the border for cheaper gas. And cheese. And beer. How hard would it be to pop a flat of pop in the trunk?

Not only will the B.C. sweetened drink tax not work, but it’s also unfair.


A fancy $6 mocha coffee drink from a hip coffee shop has 52 grams of sugar and 370 calories for a medium.

A 12 ounce can of cola that costs about $1.50 from a corner store has 39 grams of sugar and 140 calories.

This is a tax that scolds food choices and it’s a tax on the working poor.

While B.C.’s new seven per cent tax on sweetened drinks doesn’t apply to expensive sugary coffee drinks, it inexplicably does apply to other drinks that contain zero sugar. Diet colas sweetened with aspartame and even fancy pops with natural sweeteners such as stevia are getting hit with the sugary drink tax.

Anything coming out of a pop tower, a soda gun at a bar or a mixed vending machine will get this tax; the moment you buy that fountain drink cup from a fast food place you’re paying the tax, even if you fill it with soda water or orange juice.

But wait, there’s more. If you buy a bottle of water from a vending machine that also sells pop, you are paying the sweetened drinks tax. On water.

We’ve learned from experience in other places that pop taxes don’t reduce consumption, therefore, they don’t help the government’s purported fight against obesity.

All they do is sweeten the deal for government, and cost taxpayers millions of dollars.


ABOUT KRIS SIMS:

Born in the town of Hope and raised on both sides of the Strait of Georgia, Kris has been employed (and taxed) since she was 12 years old.

Kris worked in radio in the Comox Valley before moving to Ottawa to work as a legislative assistant on Parliament Hill. She then joined Ottawa News Talk Radio 580 CFRA as a reporter and anchor, eventually becoming a journalist for the CTV parliamentary bureau.

Kris was a founding reporter for Sun News Network and proudly covered issues of big government, personal liberty and the rights of small-town and rural Canadians until SNN was shut down. She then worked as the director of communications for Veterans Affairs Minister Erin O’Toole, and as the senior producer for Evan Solomon at CFRA Radio.

She is proud to return to her home of British Columbia to fight for the rights of all taxpayers.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more