Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED – The political stand that governments have this or that power is misleading … governments have responsibilities, not powers


We cannot continue to be governed by ideologues who draw their inspiration from unaccountable, and unelected, foreign bureaucracies exercising powers they are not entitled to.

Governance frameworks structure and delineate the power and the management roles in an organization. They set rules, procedures, and other informational guidelines. Governance frameworks define, guide, and provide for enforcement of these processes. These frameworks are shaped by the goals, strategic mandates, financial incentives, power structures and processes of the organization.

We expect our government to develop a mission statement, establish strategic goals compatible with the mission, and do regular reviews to ensure that work to achieving goals in on track. Thousands of public and private organizations do it as a requirement of responsible governance.

The structure of our governments, and governance, is set out in our constitution which includes the responsibilities and rules for both the federal and provincial governments. The political stand that governments have this or that power is misleading. Governments have responsibilities, not powers.

In a free and open democracy, the ultimate power is the individual, the citizen or permanent resident.

We organize ourselves into communities and organize those communities into municipalities that are self-governed under provincial legislation. The Municipal Acts vary a bit from province to province, but essentially allow a municipality, which includes villages, towns and cities to provide local services to residents and to tax property to underwrite the costs of providing those services.

There are practical limits to the services a municipality can provide. Our constitution creates a separate level of local responsibilities for provinces. There are numerous “subjects” where provinces have clear sovereignty over responsibilities within their borders. Once again there are practical limits to the powers of a province. A province cannot afford to fund its own navy or fund armed forces.

The constitution sets out a list of responsibilities for the federal government which cannot override the separate sovereignty of provinces. Nowhere in our structure, as a constitutional monarchy, is there room to allow international agreements to override the responsibilities, structure, duties and powers set out in our constitution.

The various climate change agreements and accords concocted by the United Nations cannot extend or override the powers granted to the federal government under our constitution.


The United Nations is not a governing body and has no authority in Canada.

The Paris Agreement is a UN construct that our federal government cannot employ. It has no constitutional authority to impose the Paris agreement on Canadians. Doing so violates the principles of a representative democracy.

The development of natural resources, and regulations respecting environmental concerns in that development, is a provincial “subject” and jurisdiction the federal government cannot override.

The idea that the federal government can seize control over multi-billion-dollar investments in development of our resources, based on United Nations treaties, is not acceptable.

Of the 194 nation UN members, there are about 30 democracies. Are we going to willingly allow these dictatorships, monarchies, theocracies and tyrannies to dictate governance to us?

We must wake up, smell the coffee, and tell our federal government that its responsibility to Canadians overrides its ideological dalliance with the United Nations.

Our government was not elected to superimpose UN treaties in governance of a democratic nation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more