Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- the Delgamuukw decision did not address indigenous governance, sovereignty, or any of the issues respecting indigenous self-governance -- those issues remain unresolved

Our government’s approach to negotiations with hereditary chiefs is perplexing, unorthodox and unclear; it also appears our government has capitulated to the demands of Hereditary Chiefs.

The 1997 Supreme Court Delgamuukw decision, (File No. 23799) does not appear to be a landmark decision in any way shape or form. The Delgamuukw decision did not provide indigenous people or hereditary chiefs with unfettered ownership of claimed lands.

The decision held that hereditary title was not absolute, and could be overridden to allow for projects in the best interests of non-indigenous people.     

Supreme Court of Canada
The decision did not set out the extent of claimed lands; that still must be negotiated. Claims are still outstanding.

The Delgamuukw decision did not provide hereditary chiefs with ownership of claimed lands; it held that indigenous land ownership was held by the community, not by chiefs.

Indigenous people cannot enjoy land ownership rights that surpasses the rights of non-indigenous land owners. When we are faced with public works projects including natural resources developments, roads and highways, power transmission lines, telephone and cable lines, transmission towers and a host of other works, our property rights can be overridden by expropriation or easements with commensurate compensation.

The BC tentative agreement cannot be allowed to change to course of common law land ownership precedents.


Finally, the Delgamuukw decision did not address indigenous governance, sovereignty, or any of the issues respecting indigenous self-governance. Those issues remain unresolved. 

The Supreme Court of Canada held that such issues would require a separate trial.

Negotiating with hereditary chiefs under this backdrop is very high risk. Our Prime Minister’s pleas for patience are nonsense.

The government has not shared the substance of the alleged agreements with us, so we have nothing to be patient about.

This government has made no effort to ensure that road and rail disruptions won’t start up again tomorrow, or on any subsequent day. We are left vulnerable without excuse.

This government has to go; it is failing to maintain order and peace.

John Feldsted
Political Commentator, Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

THE SIDEWINDER -- Just quit your constant damned whining and do something positive about it

  Living in a democracy is a wonderful thing, but it comes with responsibilities such as voting and being involved. When the dust settled on Saturdays (October 24 th ) BC election, less than two thirds of the eligible voters * took the time to vote - but the loudest bitchers will probably be among the more than one third of voters who sat on their asses and complained about how all politicians are crooks, etc. How many of you constant whiners have ever done anything close to becoming involved; or do you just like sniveling to hear your own voice? Are you one the arseholes who likes to take advantage of everything our democracy has to offer, without ever contributing anything? And I don't want to listen to your crap about paying taxes, blah, blah, blah. There's more to making democracy work than simply voting and then sitting back and let others carry the ball for you. Too many people seem unwilling to get involved - and follow-up - to make sure elected po

AARON GUNN -- He is, at his core, an ideologue, meaning the facts of any particular issue don’t actually matter

Ben Isitt - City Councillor and Regional Director Victoria City Council and its resident-genius Ben Isitt is back with another dumb idea. Introducing a motion to ban the horse-drawn carriages that have coloured Victoria’s downtown streets for decades, calling them “an outdated mode of transportation”. Are you serious?   No one is actually commuting by horse and carriage. They are here for tourists and residents alike to interact with world-class animals and discover the magic and history of our provincial capital. It’s part of what gives Victoria its charm. And the truth is these horses are treated better than anywhere else in the world. They probably live better lives than many British Columbians.   And talk to anyone who works with these horses and they’ll all tell you the exact same thing: this is what the horses love to do. This is what they were bred for and trained for. This is what gives their lives purpose and meaning. But maybe we shouldn’t be su

THE SIDEWINDER: MacDUFF'S NAIVE CALL

I have just struggled through Cheryl Ashlie's column ( MacDuff’s Call: A political novice with a sizeable ego ), in the Sept. 22 edition of The Maple Ridge News. To say the least, Ashlie's comments are naive and show just how totally out of touch she has become with political reality. Ashlie lauds the decision of Darryl Plecas to accept John Horgan's invitation to become the Speaker of the House, a move described by almost everyone else as self-serving and a betrayal of the trust of the constituents who voted for him. Ashlie claims Plecas' turncoat move will help provide good governance but in making this claim, she fails to explain how he will achieve this lofty goal.

Labels

Show more