Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Columbia River Treaty -- The Americans will undoubtedly want a reduction in the Canadian Entitlement but that’s what negotiations are all about


On Wednesday of this week (December 5th) the BC government will be holding a community meeting in Invermere.  At the meeting, local area residents will be given an update on the state of Columbia River Treaty (CRT) negotiations … and provided an opportunity for discussion of community interests relating to the treaty.

Also attending the meeting will be BC Liberal MLA for Columbia River – Revelstoke, and opposition critic for the CRT, Doug Clovechok.  I spoke with Doug on the weekend to ask him about the meeting, and its importance:

I fought hard to get them (BC NDP government) back here to talk to my headwater communities.  The Americans will undoubtedly want a reduction in the Canadian Entitlement, but that’s what negotiations are all about.”

I asked if he would be attending the meeting, as well as making comment himself:

BC Liberal MLA Doug Clovechok, and wife Susan (Area
“F” Director for the Regional District of the E. Kootenay)
Yes, on both counts. The purpose of the meeting is to get input from constituents, and I am looking forward to it”.

Interestingly, in an age of fiercely adversarial politics, Clovechok was positive towards Katrine Conroy, BC’s Minister Responsible for the Columbia River Treaty:

I have been working closely with the Minister. This file is truly one that can be approached with a non-partisan lens. This is important to people in the basin, as the Columbia River Treaty drives revenue for the Columbia Basin Trust 

He continued, “The NDP remain committed to the 14 principals we set out in 2014

Of the 14 principle, the first sets out the tone of what is to follow … The primary objective of the Treaty should be to maximize benefits to both countries through the coordination of planning and operations.

To that point Clovechok’s thoughts on the Treaty, and the importance of the negotiations, were not lost on me … nor should they be to other British Columbians:

The modernization of this treaty is complex as there are many downstream benefits that the Americans receive from it, that were never negotiated in the original”.


Still”, he said, “There’s no question that the Columbia River Treaty is a shining example of one of this planets most successful trans-border water treaties”.

The significance of the treaty, to those in the Columbia River Basin, again becomes borne out in these words from Clovechok, regarding his counter-part NDP Katrine Conroy:

I have a great working relationship on this with her. I think it is because (former BC Liberal MLA and Minister Responsible for the CRT) Bill Bennett afforded her the same courtesy. Her husband was one of the key drivers behind the creation of the Columbia Basin Trust when he was an NDP MLA”.

And what thoughts about the agreement, from BC’s Minister Responsible for the Columbia River Treaty, Katrine Conroy?

The renewed discussions about how we can work together to modernize the treaty are still at an early stage. This is a time to build relationships and find common ground.”

I know that negotiators from both sides of the border are working very hard as they look at options for the future of the treaty”, she concluded.

Following Wednesday’s community meeting in Invermere, the next round of Columbia River Treaty negotiation meetings will take place Dec 12th and 13th in Vancouver.

I’m Alan Forseth in Kamloops.  If you have any thoughts on this commentary, please take a moment to share them below in the Comments Section. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more