Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ADAM OLSEN: From the public’s perspective this is easily perceived as yet another example of a politician, and as it turns out a political party, putting their interest ahead of the public interest


Yesterday (February 13th) in Question Period the B.C. Liberals went after ride-hailing.



Two things here. Their attempt to own this issue while spending the better part of five years ignoring it, is a perfect illustration of politicians serving their own interests, not the public interest.



More on that in a minute.



The narrative built to a crescendo of questions raising the spectre of a conflict of interest of one member of the Select Standing Committee on Crown Corporations.



The task of the committee is to recommend regulations to the Minister of Transportation on four key areas. What was brought out into the open yesterday, is that the father of an NDP member of the committee, MLA , owns a taxi license in Greater Victoria.



Well, that is headline material and the media gathered outside the doors of the Chamber to be the first to write it.



Conflict in interest?



Conflict of interest is a big problem. In my business, even a perceived conflict of interest is unacceptable. There is a growing crisis in public confidence in our governing institutions. This story is fuel on that fire in two ways.




First, transparency and accountability. I was not told, and from her responses yesterday, it appears the Minister also did not know, of Mr. Kahlon’s connections either. This diminishes trust in government and undermines our important work of creating a regulatory framework that ensures ride-hailing is operating in our market while protecting consumer safety.



Second, public interest. From the public's perspective this is easily perceived as yet another example of a politician, and as it turns out a political party, putting their interest ahead of the public interest. That is why even a perception of a conflict is often too much. This was the first point made crystal clear to me as a rookie Councillor in Central Saanich, ten years ago.



Public interest first



Frankly, this is the on-going challenge with ride-hailing. The B.C. Liberals are desperately trying to own a populist issue they have no business getting any credit for. Their government was just as obstructionist as they claim the B.C. NDP are being. And, they were protecting the same special interests they claim the government is protecting.



Their righteous indignation on this issue makes me nauseous.



So, the media wants to know, as I imagine you do. What about Kahlon? Is he in a conflict of interest?



I don’t know. That is what we have a Conflict of Interest Commissioner for. Indeed, his only job is to investigate and rule on whether Members are in a conflict of interest.



Above all, it is my hope is that we can get this issue sorted out before our next meeting of the Standing Committee in two weeks. As a member of the committee, my focus is the public interest. We must get recommendations to the Minister that ensures the public has access to ride-hailing by the end of the year. Frankly, everything else is a distraction.



The game of political football between the BC Liberals and BC NDP, punting this issue back and forth in an attempt to score the most points, is ridiculous. Everyone knows you can't score points from punting!











Adam Olsen is the Member of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia for Saanich North and the Islands



Born in Victoria, BC in 1976, Adam has lived, worked and played his entire life on the Saanich Peninsula. He is a member of Tsartlip First Nation (W̱JOȽEȽP), where he and his wife, Emily, are raising their two children, Silas and Ella.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It seems the call for blood donors is being responded to, however ... “This effort is a marathon, not a sprint” says Canadian Blood Services

A week and a half ago I wrote the commentary ... “ While the national inventory is currently strong, an increase in blood donor cancellations is a warning sign of potential challenges to maintaining a health inventory of blood ” It was written as a result of talk about a potential blood shortage that would occur if people stopped donating due to the COVID-19 virus. It seems the call to Canadians was responded to, however, as I was told this afternoon ... “ T his effort is a marathon, not a sprint ”. As it now stands now, donors are able to attend clinics which are held in Vancouver (2), Victoria, Surrey, and in Kelowna, so I asked if there any plans to re-establish traveling clinics to others communities - for example in Kamloops, Prince George, Prince Rupert, Revelstoke or Cranbrook, and perhaps further north at perhaps Ft. St. John? According to Communications Lead Regional Public Affairs Specialist Marcelo Dominguez, Canadian Blood Services is still on

FEDLSTED -- Rules will have to relax-- the question is how and when

The media has created a fervour over the mathematical models that allegedly help governments predict the future of Coronavirus infections in the general population. Mathematical modelling has limited use and value. We need to understand is that the data available on Coronavirus (COVID-19) infections in Canada is far too small for statistical reliability. The data available for the whole world is useless due to variables in how nations responded to Coronavirus infections. There is no commonality in steps taken to combat virus spread and no similarity in the age demographics of world nations, so the numbers you see on the daily tracking of world infections are not useful in developing a model of infection rates that can be relied on. Mathematical models of the future spread of Coronavirus are better than nothing, but not a whole lot better.  Mathematical models must include assumptions on virus spreads, and various factors involved. As they are used in projections, a small erro

WUN FEATHER -- can we just put those two names to bed for a while? You can call me an ‘Indian’ and I won't mind. And let's not call the farmers and ranchers ‘Settlers’ anymore

Hey there # TeamCanada !   I can't take it any more! Well, I guess I can, but I don't want to. I want to talk about the names we call each other. My very best friends, and all my Elderly Aunts and Uncles call me an Indian. I have walked into the most magnificent dining hall at the Air Liquide Head office, Quai D'orsay in Paris, France, surrounded by the worlds top producing Cryogenics team, and Patrick Jozon, the President of Air Liquide, has seen me enter the room, and yelled: " Bonjour! There is Warren! He is my Indian friend from Canada! He and I chased Beavers together in Northern BC!" And over 400 people turned to look at me and then they all smiled, and nodded. To most European people, an Indian is an absolute ICON!   The ultimate symbol of North America. They love us. And then, one time I had just gotten married and took vacation days off to take my new wife to meet my Grandmother; I was so proud. But as soon a

Labels

Show more