Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: Over two years of government assurances that ‘all is well’ have worn thin. Evidence is mounting that the government has a major mess on its hands


From the Toronto Star ~~ Friday February 8, 2019

In September, about a month after quitting the Conservative Party, Bernier founded the People’s Party of Canada. Pundits and rival politicians dismissed it as a vanity project, the product of Bernier’s bitterness after having lost the Conservative leadership to Andrew Scheer in 2017.

But in just four months, the PPC signed up more than 33,000 members and has become a thorn in the side of Scheer and the Conservative Party, which has been forced to protect its right flank on issues like immigration and identity. More importantly, the PPC now has electoral district associations in every one of the country’s 338 federal ridings. Considering the party was little more than an angry Twitter feed last fall, the speed of PPC’s rise is notable.

Bernier declined through a spokesperson to speak to the Star for this story, but has said he wants
nothing to do with white nationalists. “Racists are not welcome in this party,” he told Montreal radio station CJAD in December.



Lumping together ‘neo-Nazis’, the ‘alt-right’ and ‘far-right’ -- while leaving out radicals from the lunatic left -- is hardly fair and balanced. Contending that this ‘problem’ is confined to Max Bernier and his People’s Party is ludicrous.  

The “far-right” (and left) has been around for decades. The ‘far-right’ is a handy label for anyone who disagrees with liberal / left / socialist views and is used so often and indiscriminately it has lost meaning. There are extremists in all sectors of the political spectrum.

Extremists try to align themselves with any federal and provincial politician, or party, that might give them voice. No one is immune. Their following is too small to form a political movement, so they try to find a home within an existing party and work within it. The PPC is no more vulnerable than any other political party.


The innuendoes and slander are underway. Bernier and his People’s Party are making the political elite nervous. They have no leverage and no way to control a new political rival. What is most worrisome for the establishment is Bernier’s departure from traditional political party structure.

Political parties are protecting their turf, and the coming election will be a test of their hold over the electorate. We are already bombarded with the usual election year bombast. Fixed election dates have rendered the normal six-week formal election period meaningless ... except for Elections Canada and Elections Act purposes. The campaign is underway and will intensify over the next the next 8 months.

It is too early to predict what impact the People’s Party will have on the October election, but one thing is clear. Electors are offered a new alternative; election campaigns will never be the same again. The dynamics are changing and will not revert to what we have seen in the past.

A new factor in this election is the government’s failure to clarify immigration policy coupled with a failure to communicate with the public on immigration matters. That creates a caldron of potential for misunderstanding and fear.

Concerns over irresponsible immigration policies do not make a person an extremist.

Over two years of government assurances that ‘all is well’ have worn thin. Evidence is mounting that the government has a major mess on its hands, is not dealing with it responsibly and is not open and honest about the immigration portfolio.

The building SNC-Lavalin scandal is similarly uncomfortable.

An honest government would have squelched the allegations of interference in judicial affairs immediately. Instead we are faced with a tight-lipped: “Nothing to see here, folks. Move on please.”

That is unacceptable.

As more information comes to light, the stench is growing. Why were amendments to the Criminal Code embodied in a financial Act? Why did the change escape scrutiny of the House of Commons Justice Committee?   

Independence of our elected representatives is a key element in a representative democracy. When representatives are constrained by the political party they are associated with, we no longer enjoy a free democracy.

The People’s Party offers to allow member independence and to put every issue up for discussion and debate. That may resonate with thousands of electors who are uncomfortable with having their representatives follow party orders rather than representing their interests.   
  
           
John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

  1. This should make the CPC in BC (that sleeps with fiberals) think before they stick a knife in the back of the BC Conservative Party again. TIME to UNITE the RIGHT. It is hard to have respect for Bernier, just a sore looser -- not a teem player. Don Purdey

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more