Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Conservatives Scott Anderson says, “Limiting the use of experts, to reduce costs and delays in motor vehicle disputes, is just is nibbling around the edges of ICBC’s real problem”


BC Attorney Genera, David Eby

Yesterday, David Eby’s Ministry of the Attorney General announced changes to court rules which he says will help bring balance between reducing legal costs and the ability of British Columbians injured in motor vehicle accidents to receive the medical benefits and settlements they need to recover from their injuries.



 “The intent of these reforms is to avoid the costs and delays associated with the disproportionate use of experts and reports that we are seeing used today … without removing access to further expertise in situations where it’s necessary”, Eby is quoted as stating.



Attorney General Eby continued, “These changes are meant to encourage greater use of court-appointed, or joint experts, to provide a more neutral expert opinion and assist the court in determining appropriate amounts for injury claims.”



It seems then, that the Ministry is trusting that amendments to the Supreme Court Civil Rules Regulation, will put a stop to the disproportionate use of experts and expert reports, which are currently being used in ICBC motor vehicle-related court cases.  The new process has been designed to encourage earlier settlements, thereby reducing the costs of settling vehicle injury claims.



However, BC Conservative Party Interim Leader was quick in his response:
I would say that limiting parties to the use of one expert, makes it hard to mount a claim if the claim is for unrelated damages.  A prime example would be if someone is in an accident, and seeks both physical and psychological damages.”.




BC Conservative Party Interim leader Scott Anderson
This should be concerning”, continued Anderson.  

 “The governments proposed amendments state that they are meant to” …  limit the number of experts and expert reports permitted to address the issue of damages, such as wage loss, future wage loss and future care that can be used by each side of a motor vehicle dispute …



How is a Doctor of medicine equipped to speak to psychological issues, and vice versa?”, questioned the Conservatives Scott Anderson.



These changes, according to the Attorney Generals Ministry, will be applied at the beginning next February, to all ICBC personal injury claims, subject to further analysis and consultation which the ministry plans to undertake.



Anderson’s response on that however was succinct:
I applaud the sentiment but the execution is faulty. In any event, this is nibbling around the edges of the real problem ICBC faces; the ability of governments to loot the corporation.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more