Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: Why are lobbyists given apparent open access to government, when members of the public and legitimate public groups can’t get a foot in the door?


Reading accounts of alleged attempts to interfere with criminal charges against SNC-Lavalin, and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s denials of ‘giving any orders’ to the Solicitor General, I could not help but recall Trudeau’s denials following news of his family holiday stay at the Aga Khan’s private island.

Trudeau saw no difficulty in accepting a free vacation from a lobbyist who received substantial funding from the government, claiming that family friendship trumped all ethical concerns.

The ethics commissioner disagreed.

Trudeau has little sense of ethical impropriety. He does business with others as if he has no governance obligations to remain neutral, or to be responsible to the public.

79 meetings with senior government officials and SNC-Lavalin on one issue?

Why are lobbyists given apparent open access to government, when members of the public and legitimate public groups can’t get a foot in the door? Why is this heavy-handed influence on governance decisions allowed?

Governance must be in the best interests of Canadians, not in the best interests of business, cartels, industry and the media.

Instead, our federal government is increasingly acting in place of Canadians rather than for Canadians.


Why are drug companies allowed to lobby Health Canada?  Why does Crown-Indigenous Relations not consult with Canadians who bear the expenses? We are part of the Crown-Indigenous equation. The government acts on our behalf, not in place of us.

Decisions taken without consultation or respect for the impact on our lives is unacceptable.

I don’t care what the government objective in imposing a new (carbon) tax on gasoline and heating fuel is, when that is done without respect for its impact on my meager pension income. It limits my activities and freedoms without justification. Thousands of others will be harder hit as they have to continue commuting to work or need a vehicle to earn a living. Farmers with huge investments in land and equipment can’t shut down their tractors and their increased costs will work their way up the chain (with added costs at each level) to higher costs at the supermarket.

The federal government is not empowered to make decisions on pipelines, without consulting with the people it serves.

Municipalities, provinces and self-proclaimed environmental groups can get their knickers in a knot, but they do not represent Canada or more than a tiny fraction of Canadians.

The notion that vociferous protest groups and lobbyist, have the ear of government, and can influence policy to the detriment of the majority, is an unacceptable repudiation of the oath our members of parliament swear when they take office. 
   
Sunny days, sunny ways have turned out to be irresponsible lunacy.
 

John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba


PLEASE NOTE ... you may wish to read the following story, “On SNC-Lavalin, Conservatives will pursue every course of action to make sure Justin Trudeau and his office are held to account”, which was posted to the blog late yesterday afternoon

CLICK HERE

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more