FELDSTED: We could easily calculate a flat tax rate, that would produce tax revenue equal to those currently produced
Overtaxing the rich: A
cautionary tale
Tim Cestnick ~~ Special to The Globe and
Mail
Published May 14, 2015
Updated May 15, 2018
The nice thing about an election year that's
accompanied by federal budget surpluses is that it's fertile ground for tax
cuts ... but who should really benefit from tax cuts? While it might not seem
politically correct to suggest that the rich should get the lion's share of tax
breaks, let me share a story that I first shared many years ago that provides
food for thought here.
Each and
every day, 10 men go to a restaurant for dinner together. The bill for all 10
comes to $100 each day. If the bill were paid the way we pay our taxes, the
first four would pay nothing; the fifth would pay $1; the sixth would pay $3;
the seventh $7; the eighth $12; the ninth $18. The 10th man – the richest –
would pay $59. Although the 10 men didn't share the bill equally, they all
seemed content enough with the arrangement – until the restaurant owner threw
them a curve... he reduced the bill ...
The nine outraged men surrounded the 10th and
brutally assaulted him. The next day, he didn't show up for dinner, so the nine
sat down and ate without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they faced
a problem that they hadn't faced before. They were $50 short.
... the right
approach to divvying up tax cuts. It's how our system should work. The people
who pay the highest taxes should get the greatest relief from a tax cut, in
absolute dollars.
The fact is, if you overtax the rich, they just
might not show up for dinner next time. After all, there are plenty of good
restaurants around the world.
CLICK
HERE and be sure to read the full story:
Mr. Cestnick neatly points out that people who are
accustomed to tax penalties, at a given rate, have no interest in tax cuts that
reflect the penalty rates.
This is why government schemes to adjust taxes for
the poor -- or middle class -- or the rich are full of unintended consequences
and resentments. Progressive tax schemes are inherently unfair and effectively
punish industry and productivity.
We have the numbers to calculate total incomes, and
we could easily calculate a flat tax rate that would produce tax revenue equal
to those currently produced.
We could then do away with most of the complex
calculations required to establish a taxable income, along with the tax
measures that refund some taxes that should not have been collected in the
first place.
Incomes below the established poverty line should
not be subject to income tax.
Taxing people
who are in low income brackets transfers support to social service agencies,
food banks and charities. That complicates problems rather than solving them.
It makes no sense to tax an employee’s pay cheque
every month and then reimburse him, for what was taken with a tax refund a few
months later. Reducing or eliminating the tax burden would have allowed that
person to enjoy a slightly better lifestyle throughout the
year.
John Feldsted
Political Consultant
& Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Comments
Post a Comment