Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

J. EDWARD LES -- Did global banana consumption go down, at least, in the aftermath of this crippling of Alberta’s economy? It did not. It went up.


Imagine if Alberta was famous not for its prodigious oil reserves, but for its banana plantations.

It’s a bit difficult to picture banana trees carpeting our northern prairie, but it might have been possible once.  Forty million years ago Alberta was a tropical paradise, rich in ferns and fauna.  Giant sequoia trees stood watch as dinosaurs roamed.


Then the climate changed.

Imagine, for the purposes of this essay, if it had not.  Imagine that modern-day enterprising Albertans took advantage of the fertile environment to grow bananas.  Not just ordinary bananas, but the most succulent and delicious of fruits, and organic to boot.

Imagine, further, that this new industry sprouted in a world hopelessly addicted to bananas, global production spiraling ever upward to satisfy the insatiable appetites of banana-mad earthlings.

Imagine that, with time, the output of Alberta’s wondrous plantations swelled to 5% of global banana production, becoming the pride of Canada as billions upon billions of dollars in profits flowed across the country.

Imagine, too, that the banana-eating mania raised the collective concern of the world’s physicians.  Sagely stroking their Hippocratic beards, 97% of doctors (themselves hopelessly addicted to bananas) agreed that gorging on bananas posed a threat to humanity.

They had trouble putting their diagnostic fingers on why, exactly.  Much scientific modelling - paid for with truckloads of taxpayers’ cash, needless to say - was conjured up, then debated by banana-stuffed delegates attending the inaugural International Panel on Banana Consumption (IPBC) in Paris.

The models all boiled down, in the end, to the old chestnut that too much of a good thing must assuredly be bad.

This is not good,” intoned the good doctors.  “This is not a balanced diet.  Something must be done - or disaster awaits.”

And disaster wouldn’t wait long, according to banana prophet and keynote speaker Mr. Albert Bore. 

Unless drastic action is taken humanity has only twelve years left,” the great man warned. 

Mr. Bore - doubly famous as failed presidential candidate in the banana republic of the United States, and as producer of the doomsday documentary “An Inconvenient Fruit”, echoed the worried doctors ... “Something must be done.”

Much finger wagging and policy pronouncements ensued.  Targets for the reduction of banana consumption were dutifully produced and enshrined in “The Paris Agreement”, a sanctimonious pact promptly ignored by most of its signatories, the Organization of Banana Exporting Countries (OBEC) chief amongst the hypocrites.

But Canada, ever the eager beaver, rushed into action, led by its uber-progressive leader, a Prime Minister who promptly vowed to “phase out” the banana plantations.


As payback to Albertans for their ingenuity, hard work, and enormous contribution to the financial well-being of all Canadians, Canada’s federal government summarily shut down Alberta’s Triple-A-rated world-leading banana industry. 

Hundreds of thousands of people were thrown out of work.  A tsunami of hardship, anguish, and bankruptcies ensued. 

Property values cratered.  Long lines formed at food banks.  Head offices emptied. Tumbleweeds blew through the streets of downtown Calgary.

Did global banana consumption go down, at least, in the aftermath of this crippling of Alberta’s economy?

It did not.  It went up.

A fundamental economic principle had eluded the bright minds in the Prime Minister’s office:  The banana “problem” - if it existed - was not a problem of supply, but rather one of demand. The world, including Canada, remained as addicted as ever.  

Canada’s exit from the market produced barely a blip.  Nations - including Canada - bought more bananas than ever before.  They just bought them elsewhere, replacing Canada’s inexpensive, tasty, organic, product with inferior bananas drenched in herbicides and pesticides and produced in countries with lax environmental standards, abusive labour practices, and totalitarian regimes.  

Saudi Arabia oil giant Aramco

Places like Saudi Arabia.

The world, arguably, could live without bananas. Which is unnecessary, of course ... no serious-minded dietician would exclude them from a balanced diet. It makes sense, further, that any bananas consumed should ideally be of the best quality, produced in an ethical and environmentally responsible manner.

The parallels with oil are obvious, with one glaring exception:  The world cannot live without oil.  Not at present, at any rate, and not for the foreseeable future. To think otherwise is hopelessly naïve, as Diane Francis recently pointed out in the Financial Post:

The fact is that world and Canadian oil demand, like gasoline guzzlers and population, will be on the rise for years to come.

Canadians vote for leaders who promise to save the planet, but allow them to continue to commute long distances along asphalt highways, drive SUVs, fly south, drink water out of plastic bottles, are addicted to electronic devices that consume huge amounts of electricity, live and work in oversized and air conditioned premises, eat packaged foods, use paper cups and towels, and pack landfill sites with manufactured goods shipped halfway around the world only to be prematurely discarded.

We Canadians, like the rest of the developed world, are hooked on our creature comforts.  And the rest of the world, including India and China (by far the most populous nations), seeks the pleasant existence that we take for granted, and is busily harnessing the transformative power of fossil fuels to lift millions out of poverty.  And who can blame them?

As in the banana analogy, the problem of oil consumption – if it exists - is not a problem of supply, but one of insatiable demand.

It’s plainly obvious that we’re not going to return to the Stone Age.  It’s just as plainly obvious that as we develop alternative energy strategies we should, as much as is possible, consume fossil fuels harvested in the most ethical, environmentally responsible manner.  The way that they’re harvested in Canada.

To instead shut down Canadian production -- while the world merrily burns ever-greater quantities of dirty oil -- is far more than foolish ... it’s completely bananas.


J. Edward Les, MD, DVM is a Physician, husband, father, cancer survivor, veterinarian ... the foundations of a sturdy soapboxAll views expressed by the author on this blog are his own

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It seems the call for blood donors is being responded to, however ... “This effort is a marathon, not a sprint” says Canadian Blood Services

A week and a half ago I wrote the commentary ... “ While the national inventory is currently strong, an increase in blood donor cancellations is a warning sign of potential challenges to maintaining a health inventory of blood ” It was written as a result of talk about a potential blood shortage that would occur if people stopped donating due to the COVID-19 virus. It seems the call to Canadians was responded to, however, as I was told this afternoon ... “ T his effort is a marathon, not a sprint ”. As it now stands now, donors are able to attend clinics which are held in Vancouver (2), Victoria, Surrey, and in Kelowna, so I asked if there any plans to re-establish traveling clinics to others communities - for example in Kamloops, Prince George, Prince Rupert, Revelstoke or Cranbrook, and perhaps further north at perhaps Ft. St. John? According to Communications Lead Regional Public Affairs Specialist Marcelo Dominguez, Canadian Blood Services is still on

FEDLSTED -- Rules will have to relax-- the question is how and when

The media has created a fervour over the mathematical models that allegedly help governments predict the future of Coronavirus infections in the general population. Mathematical modelling has limited use and value. We need to understand is that the data available on Coronavirus (COVID-19) infections in Canada is far too small for statistical reliability. The data available for the whole world is useless due to variables in how nations responded to Coronavirus infections. There is no commonality in steps taken to combat virus spread and no similarity in the age demographics of world nations, so the numbers you see on the daily tracking of world infections are not useful in developing a model of infection rates that can be relied on. Mathematical models of the future spread of Coronavirus are better than nothing, but not a whole lot better.  Mathematical models must include assumptions on virus spreads, and various factors involved. As they are used in projections, a small erro

When necessary – and only when necessary – the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program can attach (garnish) wages

Alan Forseth ~~ Kamloops, BC ~~ May 15th Earlier this week (Monday May 13 th ) the BC government announced it would be establishing a new Crown agency to oversee the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program (FMEP).   They indicated that on or before the end of October, the provision of family maintenance services would transition from a contracted service provider, to the newly created Crown agency. Apparently, this was to ensure that family maintenance enforcement services for vulnerable British Columbians continue uninterrupted. Seeing this story, reminded me of a woman ( we’ll call her Mary Brown ) who had email me some time b ack about this very thing, and questions she had about how maintenance enforcement was imposed and enforced. She said to me, “ I’m just curious if you can get any statistics of the homeless men and woman, that have children, that they are paying family maintenance in support of their children”.  “I am not about to sugg

Labels

Show more