Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

DAN ALBAS: There have been tax reduction efforts federally, however income taxes in many provinces have risen in addition to increases in property taxes


USED WITH PERMISSION

As many accountants and tax professionals will know, January of each year is the opening of “income tax season”; the period of time up until April 30th when in this case, your 2018 income taxes must be filed with the Canada Revenue Agency.

If you follow political discussions, you will likely have heard claims that income taxes have gone up, as well as counter claims that they have gone down. In this report, I wanted to review federal income tax changes over the past 18 years for more context on this subject.

Going back to the year 2000, there were just three federal income tax brackets, your first $30,004 was taxed at a rate of 17%, the next $30,004 up to $60,009 was taxed at a rate of 25%, and all income over $60,009 was taxed at 29%.

There were some significant changes in 2013. A fourth income tax bracket on your income up to $43,561, that would be taxed at a lower rate of 15%.

The second tax bracket was adjusted so that income between $43,562 up to $87,123 was taxed at a rate of 22%, while the third tax bracket on income over $87,123 up to $135,054 was taxed at a rate of 26%.  THEN THERE WAS THE NEW TAX BRACKET, where income over $135,054 was taxed at 29%

The net effect of these tax changes was that lower income workers earning up to $43,561 paid 2% less tax. On income in the other tax brackets there were also tax breaks of 3% with the exception of the highest tax bracket.

In the 2016 tax year there were again further changes to the tax brackets including the addition of a 5th tax bracket.  For the lowest income earners up to $45,202 there was no change and the income tax rate remained at 15%. On the next tax bracket from $45,202 up to $90,563, taxes were reduced from 22% in 2015 down to 20.5%.  Income between $90,563 up to $140,388 remained unchanged at 26% and income over $140,388 up to $200,000 was taxed at the same 2015 tax rate of 29%.


The new 5th tax bracket on income over $200,000 was taxed at 33%.

The net effect of these 2016 tax changes was that lower income citizens did not receive a tax break but those in the middle did. Higher income earners were taxed either at the same rate or more.

For this current 2018 tax year the income tax brackets remain unchanged at 15%, 20.5%, 26%, 29% and 33% respectively.

This comparison does not include the elimination of many income tax credits that have occurred since 2016 nor does it account for the lowering of the GST. It also does not include the Working Income Tax Benefit that is now referred to the Canada Workers Benefit or to the Canada Child Benefit (CCB).

Depending on your income tax situation, you may be paying more, or less since the year 2000.

Given the scale of tax reduction to many income tax brackets in 2013, combined with the middle-income tax bracket reduction in 2016, many Canadians are likely paying less federal income tax today.

Although there have been tax reduction efforts federally, most will know that income taxes in many provinces have risen in addition to increases in property taxes.

Here’s my question to you:
Are you satisfied with the total amount of tax that you pay for the services and programs you receive?

I can be reached at Dan.Albas@parl.gc.ca or call toll free 1-800-665-8711.



Dan Albas, Conservative Member of Parliament for the riding of Central Okanagan – Similkameen – Nicola, is currently the Shadow Minister of Innovation, Science, Economic Development and Internal Trade and sits on the Standing Committee on Industry, Science, and Technology.

MP Dan welcomes comments, questions and concerns from citizens and is often available to speak to groups and organizations on matters of federal concern.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It seems the call for blood donors is being responded to, however ... “This effort is a marathon, not a sprint” says Canadian Blood Services

A week and a half ago I wrote the commentary ... “ While the national inventory is currently strong, an increase in blood donor cancellations is a warning sign of potential challenges to maintaining a health inventory of blood ” It was written as a result of talk about a potential blood shortage that would occur if people stopped donating due to the COVID-19 virus. It seems the call to Canadians was responded to, however, as I was told this afternoon ... “ T his effort is a marathon, not a sprint ”. As it now stands now, donors are able to attend clinics which are held in Vancouver (2), Victoria, Surrey, and in Kelowna, so I asked if there any plans to re-establish traveling clinics to others communities - for example in Kamloops, Prince George, Prince Rupert, Revelstoke or Cranbrook, and perhaps further north at perhaps Ft. St. John? According to Communications Lead Regional Public Affairs Specialist Marcelo Dominguez, Canadian Blood Services is still on

FEDLSTED -- Rules will have to relax-- the question is how and when

The media has created a fervour over the mathematical models that allegedly help governments predict the future of Coronavirus infections in the general population. Mathematical modelling has limited use and value. We need to understand is that the data available on Coronavirus (COVID-19) infections in Canada is far too small for statistical reliability. The data available for the whole world is useless due to variables in how nations responded to Coronavirus infections. There is no commonality in steps taken to combat virus spread and no similarity in the age demographics of world nations, so the numbers you see on the daily tracking of world infections are not useful in developing a model of infection rates that can be relied on. Mathematical models of the future spread of Coronavirus are better than nothing, but not a whole lot better.  Mathematical models must include assumptions on virus spreads, and various factors involved. As they are used in projections, a small erro

WUN FEATHER -- can we just put those two names to bed for a while? You can call me an ‘Indian’ and I won't mind. And let's not call the farmers and ranchers ‘Settlers’ anymore

Hey there # TeamCanada !   I can't take it any more! Well, I guess I can, but I don't want to. I want to talk about the names we call each other. My very best friends, and all my Elderly Aunts and Uncles call me an Indian. I have walked into the most magnificent dining hall at the Air Liquide Head office, Quai D'orsay in Paris, France, surrounded by the worlds top producing Cryogenics team, and Patrick Jozon, the President of Air Liquide, has seen me enter the room, and yelled: " Bonjour! There is Warren! He is my Indian friend from Canada! He and I chased Beavers together in Northern BC!" And over 400 people turned to look at me and then they all smiled, and nodded. To most European people, an Indian is an absolute ICON!   The ultimate symbol of North America. They love us. And then, one time I had just gotten married and took vacation days off to take my new wife to meet my Grandmother; I was so proud. But as soon a

Labels

Show more