The key cost drivers behind the proposed 3.8% tax increase according to the City of Kamloops? They include provincially driven programs, additional RCMP members, increased service levels, along with inflation and wages
Here in the City of Kamloop’s, the provisional budget indicates the possibility of a 3.38% increase in taxes for homeowners. I do NOT believe however, that the combined EHT, and final payment for MSP, are the factors greatly impacting that proposed tax increase.
Key financial cost drivers behind the increase, according to the city, include provincially driven programs, additional RCMP members, increased service levels, and inflation and wages. Here’s the breakdown:
- 1.1% increase due to new provincial rates and taxes for BC Hydro, ICBC, Employer Health Tax, and the (much maligned) Carbon Tax
- 1.28% increase due to the addition of three Council-approved RCMP officers, as well as increased services (those would include additional transit hours, and snow clearing and street maintenance) ... and a ...
- 1% increase due to inflation and wages. The increase is offset by increasing revenues from overall development and community growth.
Concerned about this, a friend of mine recently asked Kamloops Finance Department the following:
Since the city has been paying MSP for its staff, how is the new employer tax so much higher than the old MSP premiums? Don't they cancel each other out to a significant degree?
The response back to him, from Corporate Services Director Kathy Humphrey, and Budget and Reporting Manager Dave Hallinan (also posted on the city’s website), was:
... in 2018, the BC Government introduced the Employer Health Tax or EHT (which at 1.95%) ... will be approximately $200,000 higher than what the City was paying for MSP ($1.4 million dollars vs MSP at $1.2 million dollars).
The City had already reduced the MSP budget by 50%, which now means they are still required to pay 50% MSP ($600,000) cost, plus the EHT ($1.4 million dollars) for the upcoming budget year.
This makes sense as an acquaintance who knows his way around a calculator, debits, credits, and pretty much all matters financial, more or less confirmed comments made by City Hall:
“To be fair, I'm not sure that the EHT had been announced when they proposed the first MSP reduction – meaning the City probably thought that their costs would be $600,000 less. They didn't set the funds aside because they didn't know that they would be paying 50% of MSP on top of EHT in 2019.”
They continued; “Had they known, maybe they would have put the $600,000 into reserves to cover the MSP for 2019. Maybe ...”
While unsure what the total payroll for the city would be, they estimated a cost of $80-$100 million ... placing EHT costs at approximately $1.6 to $2 million. This estimate ended up being fairly accurate.
Based on the 2019 there are 771.05 full time equivalents (FTEs) employed in the city. The planned payroll for 2019 is $79.5 million. The total costs of EHT is estimated at $1.4 to $1.5 million for all City Employees (including CUPE, IIAF and Management) said Kathy Humphrey and Dave Hallinan.
The cost of $200 thousand for EHT (vs HST) ... plus the extra $600 thousand charge for HST demanded by the provincial government during the phase out of MSP costs ... should work out to 0.8 million ($800,000) added to the city budget.
Then we have the 1.28% increase due to three additional RCMP officers at $600,000, increased services including additional transit hours at $250,000, and snow clearing and street maintenance at $400,000... works out to $1.25 million added to the city budget.
Finally, there’s city’s proposed one percent increase for inflation and wages – an amount which the city’s budget page indicated was offset by ... increased revenues from development and city growth. That wasn’t entirely accurate though, or perhaps it was improperly explained.
That’s because when asked why the city had included it in the proposed tax increase, when revenues from development and city growth would cover that, I was told that in actual fact only a part of ... or a portion of increased civic revenues would cover those increased costs for inflation and wages.
Unfortunately, that makes it pretty difficult to accurately estimate what the increased dollar figure for inflation and wages works out to because of this. Let’s try though.
The proposed City of Kamloops 2019 budget will be ... $109,870,000
Given the above $800,000, the $1.208 million, and $1.250 million equals $3,258 million, that must mean the increase for wages and inflation comes in at $306,000.
Does the city need an extra $3.6 million in its 2019 budget? Maybe ... maybe not.
Consider the fact Kelowna is smaller in size by a third (212KM vs our 310) with a population that is larger by a third (120,000 people vs our 90,000). One would have to think the costs to run a city like Kamloops, over the area it covers, would have to be higher.
In Kelowna, residents are facing a tax hike of 4.4% (approx $88 / yr) ... meantime we're looking at an increase of 3.38% (approx $65 / yr).
But you tell me – what do you think?
By all indications, considering the promptness of replies from David Hallinan (Manager responsible for Planning and Budgets, along with Corporate Services Director Kathy Humphrey, they seem to have no problems answering questions on this years budget.
And with that in mind, there will also be a Public Budget Meeting held on February 7th, so if you’re wondering why, and if, we need the above mention increases, show up and ask.
I’m Alan Forseth in Kamloops. If you have any thoughts on this or anything else you read on the blog, I welcome you to share them below in the Comments Section.