Veterans Affairs fiscal faux-pas leads to hardship and hurt – the worst suffered by retirees in the lowest ranks, along with the disabled who had little other income
Anatomy of a blunder: How Veterans Affairs quietly buried a $165M accounting
error. The department found and
corrected the error in 2010 - but made no efforts to compensate veterans
Murray Brewster ~~ CBC News ~~ Jan 11, 2019
Murray Brewster ~~ CBC News ~~ Jan 11, 2019
It was an
incredibly simple (and incredibly daft) mistake — and it led to a $165 million
federal fiscal faux-pas. In 2001, the Liberal government of Prime Minister Jean
Chrétien made what appeared to be an innocuous change to federal tax
forms. It separated federal and provincial tax exemptions, shuffling the basic
personal tax credit from one part of the document to another.
Staff at Veterans
Affairs, who administer disability awards and pensions, did not pick up on the
modification to the tax law for several years, and ended up short-changing
former soldiers — most of them elderly — who received disability pensions
and awards benefits.
CLICK HERE to read
the full story
This was not a blunder or an ‘accounting error’ – it was a failure to carry out responsible stewardship of our commitments to our military personnel, and a deliberate effort to hide malfeasance. While Veterans Affairs thought no one would notice, on average, military pensioners and disabled persons lost $5.62 per person per month.
NOW ... you might not think that's a lot, but let’s do the math:
$5.62 x 12 months =
$67.40 / year x 9 years = $606.62
Multiply that by
272,000 individuals and you have ... $165,000,000.
That’s right. One
hundred and sixty-five MILLION dollars!
Averages are
deceptive as the worst hardship, and hurt, was suffered by the lowest ranks
(lowest paid) retirees ... and the disabled who had little other income. There
appear to be no standard of competence for our federal civil service ... and the
lack of ethics and remorse is unacceptable.
These people appear immune to discipline for error, no matter how many
people are hurt as a result.
Department managers
are paid to supervise, and pay levels are commensurate with the numbers of
employees supervised. When benefit calculations are based on taxation, any
change to tax law requires scrutiny to establish how benefits are affected.
The only reason we
have not seen a heartfelt apology, complete with requisite tears, is that the
government is currently in court trying to justify arbitrary reductions in
pensions ... and injury benefits to military personnel.
The governments record
on military matters and treatment of military personnel are
disgusting.
John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Comments
Post a Comment