FELDSTED: The concept of ‘consultation’ with everyone on petroleum projects is inane. Either Justin Trudeau Liberal government has to take leadership on resource development ... or step aside and allow someone competent to do so
Energy assessment law
needed to avoid another Trans Mountain impasse, PM says. 'You don't have to buy
an energy project in order to de-risk it'
Mia Rabson ~~ The
Canadian Press ~~ Dec 18, 2018
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says he is
overhauling how Canada assesses big energy projects in a bid to ensure new
projects can get built without the government having to buy them to make that
happen. "We're going to work to
make sure that we're creating a system where you don't have to pass a law to
get a pipeline built, you don't have to buy an energy project in order to
de-risk it," Trudeau said in a recent interview with The Canadian Press.
"We want an energy sector where the private
sector has confidence in getting our resources to markets." ....
CLICK HERE for the full story:
We do not need separate law for the energy sector.
What we need is a
comprehensive federal law dealing with environmental
protection. All sectors should be treated equally. The ‘energy sector’ includes
atomic, ethanol, hydro-electric, coal-electric, gas-electric, geo-thermal,
hydrogen, solar and wind technology ... and all pose environmental challenges
of one kind or another.
Energy assessment is Trudeau code for continuing to
treat the Alberta petrochemical energy sector with blatant bias, and continue
eastern Canada’s oil imports at the expense of Canada. Let’s call a spade a
spade and bury Trudeau in his divisive rhetoric.
More and more industries are using carbon fibre for
weight reduction in everything from aircraft to automobiles to trucks; industry
can form parts that are stronger and more resilient than steel with a fraction
of the weight. The war on carbon ignores the benefits and necessity of
petrochemical products.
Without
petrochemical lubricants, wiring insulation and circuit boards, a high efficacy
home heating furnace is just a useless lump metal. Without petrochemicals used
in the circuit boards and components of our computer, tablets and telephones,
we lose wireless connections and the internet.
Just
one of many recent convoys on the road to
tell
Federal government that Canadian families
depend
on the oil and gas industries to survive
|
Environment protection is not named in
constitutional subjects under provincial control, so it becomes a federal
matter by default. Therefore, dozens of provincial and municipal environmental
laws, and regulation, are not constitutional and must be so treated.
The petroleum pipeline portion of the energy sector
is the only place where regulations is based on zero risk. Prudent
environmental policy seeks to minimize, not eliminate risk. We build better
facilities (which include pipelines) with better controls to mitigate
contamination and spills.
- We need stability, not unpredictability.
- We need to develop a policy and laws for easements, and appropriate compensation for landowners where a works or pipeline runs over, under, or on the land.
- We need a separate policy and law for dealing with natural resource development on lands owned by others. Easements and royalties should have a framework that is consistent, fair and predictable.
Claiming that we have to await the courts to decide
actions brought by municipalities and provinces is an excuse to avoid federal
responsibility. We can’t buy groceries with excuses.
Either Justin Trudeau's Liberal government has to take leadership on resource
development, or step aside and allow someone competent to do so.
John Feldsted
Political Consultant
& Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Comments
Post a Comment