Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

PAUL FORSETH -- Iran will make international deals and promises, but as soon as the Regime sees an opportunity, it will break promises and again push forward its aggressive ideology


My thanks to many sources that are quoted without attribution in this opinion piece, as they are too many to list.  Sentences have been liberally lifted from multiplied internet research documents ... Paul Forseth

I have delayed comment on Iran, midst our sorrow over the lost lives of the airline tragedy.  It is easy to respond quickly with pronouncements.  However, I am mindful of the long road of history that brought us to the present political contest with Iran. Today, Iran is an Islamic religious dictatorship.
  
We recall that Islam has been in conflict with other nations and political powers since its beginning with Mohammad (570–632).  Islam arose from various streams of superstition and religious practice, and after Mohammad, there was much violence over succession and control.  Assassinations and war devolved into many religious factions and varied governing Caliphates.  There have been more than a dozen Caliphates that emerged after Mohammad, all of which involved violent conflict.

In the West in recent times, perhaps since the creation of the United Nations, response to the Islamic challenge has been in political and military terms.  However, it is inadequate, because the nature of Islamic conquest and subjugation of peoples is “spiritual” as well as “carnal territorial destiny”.  Iranian religion and politics must have a religious and political response.

Islam's central idea is a universal political religion.  Islam envisages a global political order in which all humankind will someday live under Muslim rule, as either believers or subject communities.  To achieve this goal, it is incumbent on all free, male, adult Muslims to carry out an uncompromising struggle "in the path of Allah", or jihad.  This in turn, makes those parts of the world that have not yet been conquered by the House of Islam, an abode of permanent conflict (Dar al-Harb, the "house of war") which will only end with Islam's eventual triumph. 

In the early 21st century, following the failure of the Arab Spring and defeat of the latest self-proclaimed "Islamic State", there seems to be an embrace of collective Muslim identity by young Muslims with the ephemeral appeal of another Caliphate as an idealized future Muslim state.

If we understand the ideological core of Iran and its sense of place in this world, then we can understand why its exports war into the west through terrorist agencies.  The ideology of the Iranian Revolution has been called a complex combination of nationalism, and Shia Islamic religious radicalism.

The Islamic Republic of Iran is fundamentally a religious regime with the goal of establishing an Islamist world empire.  The mythology of this regime’s ideology requires the existence of the forces of “good” and “evil” along a rigidly drawn line.  The regime regards itself and its allies as good, and the West in general as evil.  For the existence of the regime to have any meaning at all, this myth must survive.

Iran is relentless.  It will do or say anything to promote itself, and their quest for nuclear weapons then is understandable; they have no restraining ideology not to use them.  Iran will make international deals and promises, but as soon as the Regime sees an opportunity, it will break promises and again push forward its aggressive ideology. 

A notorious example was the trick that the regime pulled on President Barack Obama immediately after the signing of the nuclear deal.  On the day President Obama was delivering the 2016 State of the Union address, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps detained some US Marines in the Persian Gulf, publicly parading their capture.  The large mural of that disgraceful event was on display in Valiasr Square in Tehran.  Iran also secretly cheated on the main points of the nuclear deal, which then led to Trump’s decisions.

More recently, while teetering on the verge of economic collapse under unprecedented international sanctions for its pursuit of nuclear weapons and interventionism in the Middle East, Tehran upped the ante by shooting down a multi-million-dollar American drone over the Persian Gulf.  Surprisingly, it managed to get away with it.  The regime also stands accused of the September missile attacks on the Saudi Aramco oil facilities in eastern Saudi Arabia that disabled 50% of Saudi output and disrupted the global oil supply. 

It is inconceivable that the deadly interception of Ukraine International Airlines Flight 752 was accidental.  


What is of primary importance to the Islamic Republic is the maintenance of the mythological system that it has created for itself.   Western politicians, who are secular pragmatists, have let the regime get away with impunity.  The West's character of "freedom of religion" and secular institutions, make it impotent to include a religious response to Iran.

For the Islamic Republic not to be able to continue this game of cat and mouse with the West, it must once and for all be rid of its ideological footing.  Therefore, if President Donald Trump's administration genuinely means to change the behavior of the regime in Iran, then it must force the Ayatollahs and their Revolutionary Guards to accept their defeat before the eyes of the world.  

The fall of an ideological regime starts with the collapse of its fundamental myths.  A central one is that their Islamic political system from the years of the 600's, has any relevance or utility for societies in a modern world.

CBC has been promoting the idea that Justin Trudeau should fulfill his earlier musings that Canada should have some diplomatic official contact with Iran, even if it is not full Ambassadorships, such as a Consular Business Office in Tehran.  However, my Iranian friends tell me that amidst legitimate demands for Consular Services including business travel, seeing loved-ones, and facilitating the repatriation of the dead from the airline crash, it should not happen. 

Iran would consider such a request as an opening for their illegitimate activities again. 

They would see this as a failure of Canadian foreign policy and they would not legitimately behave with fair reciprocity.  A Consular Office exchange would open up a pandora box of infiltration of our democratic institutions.  Over the years, so-called "diplomats" of the Iranian regime have been caught in terrorist activities, expelled in some cases, and engaged in money-laundering.  The Iranian Embassy in Ottawa was a spy base.


Canadian Iranians say that we must push and demand that Canada lists the IRGC as a terrorist entity, not for political posture, but because they are terrorists in belief and behaviour.

Conservatives presented a motion in June 2018 to that end. Conservative and Liberal Parliamentarians joined forces to support a private member's motion presented by a Conservative MP that condemns Iranian-backed terrorism directed against Israel and which calls on the Canadian government to "immediately cease any and all negotiations or discussions with the Islamic Republic of Iran to restore diplomatic relations". 

The motion demands the release of Canadians held in Iran while recognizing the Iranian people's fundamental rights to freedom of conscience and religion.  The motion also called for the immediate designation of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a listed terrorist entity under the Criminal Code. 

Strangely enough, the Liberals including Prime Minister voted in favour, but nothing has happened since.

Canada must re-think its foreign policy for special cases like Iran.  The usual accepted diplomatic dance in the realm of secular politics does not work with a fanatical religious dictatorship.


Now retired, Paul Forseth lives in Powell River.

He represented his original home area of New Westminster in the House of Commons for over 12 years, and was elected with the Reform Party in 1993 and 1997. He was a member of the Canadian Alliance when elected in 2000. He was re-elected as a Conservative in 2004 and served until the election of January 2006.

For 23 years he was a Family Justice Counselor, Divorce Mediator, Child Custody Investigator, Probation and Parole Officer, and Youth Court Officer in the Corrections Branch and Courts of BC. Paul has spent considerable time on human rights issues, democratic renewal, and religious freedom in other countries. He continues as a volunteer on various community boards.

His opinions are related to Canadian political culture.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The stats clearly demonstrate the need for professional and impartial advice at the time of purchase, renewal, and refinancing of mortgages

REPRINTED WITH PERMISSION : Canadian Mortgage Trends   Canadians need guidance with their mortgages ... t hat’s the takeaway from a national survey released this week by Rates.ca, which found half of Canadians aren’t aware of the mortgage options available to them. Not only that, but Canadians are lacking in some other basic mortgage trivia, with an astounding 9 out of 10 respondents not knowing that mortgage interest is charged semi-annually: 28% think interest is compounded monthly; 17% think it’s bi-weekly; 17% think it’s annually; 28% just have no idea. Should we be concerned? Dustan Woodhouse, President of Mortgage Architects, and a former active broker who has written multiple educational mortgage books, thinks so. “ Sounds about right. We know about what we pay attention to, i.e., The Kardashians ,” he wrote to CMT. “ The material concern in this is how easy it makes it for the government to over-regulate the industry, with c

THE SIDEWINDER -- Just quit your constant damned whining and do something positive about it

  Living in a democracy is a wonderful thing, but it comes with responsibilities such as voting and being involved. When the dust settled on Saturdays (October 24 th ) BC election, less than two thirds of the eligible voters * took the time to vote - but the loudest bitchers will probably be among the more than one third of voters who sat on their asses and complained about how all politicians are crooks, etc. How many of you constant whiners have ever done anything close to becoming involved; or do you just like sniveling to hear your own voice? Are you one the arseholes who likes to take advantage of everything our democracy has to offer, without ever contributing anything? And I don't want to listen to your crap about paying taxes, blah, blah, blah. There's more to making democracy work than simply voting and then sitting back and let others carry the ball for you. Too many people seem unwilling to get involved - and follow-up - to make sure elected po

AARON GUNN -- He is, at his core, an ideologue, meaning the facts of any particular issue don’t actually matter

Ben Isitt - City Councillor and Regional Director Victoria City Council and its resident-genius Ben Isitt is back with another dumb idea. Introducing a motion to ban the horse-drawn carriages that have coloured Victoria’s downtown streets for decades, calling them “an outdated mode of transportation”. Are you serious?   No one is actually commuting by horse and carriage. They are here for tourists and residents alike to interact with world-class animals and discover the magic and history of our provincial capital. It’s part of what gives Victoria its charm. And the truth is these horses are treated better than anywhere else in the world. They probably live better lives than many British Columbians.   And talk to anyone who works with these horses and they’ll all tell you the exact same thing: this is what the horses love to do. This is what they were bred for and trained for. This is what gives their lives purpose and meaning. But maybe we shouldn’t be su

Labels

Show more