Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Selina Robinson and BC NDP have wasted valuable time coming up with an alternative that gives less flexibility to local governments, and is simply less effective, says BC Liberal Housing Critic Todd Stone


VICTORIA (February 24, 2020) – The NDP introduced legislation today that claims to provide property tax relief to businesses, however, the proposed solution is not what small businesses, local governments and many other stakeholders were asking for, which was ending the tax on unused airspace.

A broad coalition of stakeholders — including small businesses, chambers of commerce, boards of trade, and non-profits — have been collaborating for years on a solution to rising property taxes. What they all agreed on was the need for the province to allow for split-assessment, which is provided for in the bill that I introduced in the Legislature last fall, and re-introduced again last week,” said BC Liberal Critic for Housing Todd Stone.

Instead of adopting a flexible, common sense and widely supported solution, Housing Minister Selina Robinson has turned her back on local businesses and proposed legislation that doesn’t actually take action to address skyrocketing property taxes on unused airspace over the heads of small businesses.”

Today’s legislation provides limited exemptions to tenants of triple-net leases — meaning other small businesses could continue to be taxed on the unused airspace about their heads — instead of addressing the underlying problem of businesses paying taxes on airspace they do not use.

The bill proposed by MLA Stone would have given local governments the ability to create a new commercial property subclass — separating the existing value of buildings from the development potential of the site on which the building is currently located — and tax it at a mill rate the works best for their individual communities.


Split assessment was what local governments, businesses, and organizations wanted”.

Now, the Minister has proposed an approach which will require small businesses to lobby local governments for exemptions case by case. As opposed to this patchwork approach, my private members’ bill was widely supported by stakeholders, and it now seems apparent that Minister Robinson only opposed it because it was endorsed by the BC Liberals.”

Now, she has wasted valuable time coming up with an alternative that gives less flexibility to local governments and is simply less effective. I urge the Minister to reconsider her legislation and implement a solution that will truly work for all stakeholders”, concluded Stone.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The stats clearly demonstrate the need for professional and impartial advice at the time of purchase, renewal, and refinancing of mortgages

REPRINTED WITH PERMISSION : Canadian Mortgage Trends   Canadians need guidance with their mortgages ... t hat’s the takeaway from a national survey released this week by Rates.ca, which found half of Canadians aren’t aware of the mortgage options available to them. Not only that, but Canadians are lacking in some other basic mortgage trivia, with an astounding 9 out of 10 respondents not knowing that mortgage interest is charged semi-annually: 28% think interest is compounded monthly; 17% think it’s bi-weekly; 17% think it’s annually; 28% just have no idea. Should we be concerned? Dustan Woodhouse, President of Mortgage Architects, and a former active broker who has written multiple educational mortgage books, thinks so. “ Sounds about right. We know about what we pay attention to, i.e., The Kardashians ,” he wrote to CMT. “ The material concern in this is how easy it makes it for the government to over-regulate the industry, with c

THE SIDEWINDER -- Just quit your constant damned whining and do something positive about it

  Living in a democracy is a wonderful thing, but it comes with responsibilities such as voting and being involved. When the dust settled on Saturdays (October 24 th ) BC election, less than two thirds of the eligible voters * took the time to vote - but the loudest bitchers will probably be among the more than one third of voters who sat on their asses and complained about how all politicians are crooks, etc. How many of you constant whiners have ever done anything close to becoming involved; or do you just like sniveling to hear your own voice? Are you one the arseholes who likes to take advantage of everything our democracy has to offer, without ever contributing anything? And I don't want to listen to your crap about paying taxes, blah, blah, blah. There's more to making democracy work than simply voting and then sitting back and let others carry the ball for you. Too many people seem unwilling to get involved - and follow-up - to make sure elected po

AARON GUNN -- He is, at his core, an ideologue, meaning the facts of any particular issue don’t actually matter

Ben Isitt - City Councillor and Regional Director Victoria City Council and its resident-genius Ben Isitt is back with another dumb idea. Introducing a motion to ban the horse-drawn carriages that have coloured Victoria’s downtown streets for decades, calling them “an outdated mode of transportation”. Are you serious?   No one is actually commuting by horse and carriage. They are here for tourists and residents alike to interact with world-class animals and discover the magic and history of our provincial capital. It’s part of what gives Victoria its charm. And the truth is these horses are treated better than anywhere else in the world. They probably live better lives than many British Columbians.   And talk to anyone who works with these horses and they’ll all tell you the exact same thing: this is what the horses love to do. This is what they were bred for and trained for. This is what gives their lives purpose and meaning. But maybe we shouldn’t be su

Labels

Show more