Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- If a breach of ethics, Criminal Code, or federal statutes investigation is underway, investigators must be allowed to seek an Order for government to produce relevant Cabinet materials


As an explanation, this CBC article is an epic fail. First, the Queen’s Privy Council and the Government Cabinet are separate bodies with separate mandates.

The Privy Council provides apolitical advice to the Governor General on what is going on in Government. The Cabinet oversees operations of government departments and agencies. Cabinet ministers are usually members of the Privy Council and their duties vary depending on which body they are attending.

Privy council confidentiality is absolute. Members cannot disclose what is discussed during a privy council meeting. The Clerk of the Privy Council has no authority over the Government Cabinet. It is outside of his jurisdiction.

Cabinet confidentiality is less onerous than Privy Council confidentiality and can be waived by either the Prime Minister or the Courts.

Prior to 1940 the roles were separate, and should be separate today.

Amalgamation causes confusion of the sort highlighted during the SNC-Lavalin affair. The Attorney General and Minister of Justice are separate functions with different responsibilities.     

Justin Trudeau is fairly caught. The Clerk of the Privy Council is not independent; he or she reports to Trudeau. Privy Council confidentiality cannot be applied to Cabinet meetings and material. Trudeau and Privy Council Clerk Ian Shugart can’t hide from their responsibilities.

There is no justification for the confusion.

Separate the roles of the Clerk of the Privy Council, and Secretary to the Cabinet, and Minister of Justice and Attorney General. The media, MPs and the public should not need an index to sort out who they are communicating with.

In past, courts have held that Cabinet confidentiality is important to encourage Cabinet members to speak fully and frankly during meetings. That is fundamental to democracy. These men and women were elected to represent us in government and cannot be censored in what they say or the ideas they put forward.

If there is an investigation underway in respect to a breach of ethics or the Criminal Code or other federal statutes, investigators must be allowed to seek an Order for the government to produce relevant Cabinet materials. The Judge can preview material to ensure that it is relevant to the investigation before releasing it.

The Mark Norman affair is another example of where our government refused to produce documents vital to Mr. Norman's defence and when it had destroyed his career, admitted it did not have case. These who wrongfully charged Mr. Norman need to be brought to justice.

For our Prime Minister to play a game of “Simon Says” with the media, opposition parties and police during an investigation into potential criminal actions is disgusting.

Trudeau must not be allowed to escape accountability.

Our Prime Minister, Cabinet members and Members of Parliament are all accountable to the public.

When our representatives break the law, they must be held accountable. The litany of excuses and evasions we are offered can be expected when petty criminals appear before a court. They are not appropriate in our parliament during an investigation.

None of them are above the law.


The Way I See It ~~ John Feldsted
Political Commentator, Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It seems the call for blood donors is being responded to, however ... “This effort is a marathon, not a sprint” says Canadian Blood Services

A week and a half ago I wrote the commentary ... “ While the national inventory is currently strong, an increase in blood donor cancellations is a warning sign of potential challenges to maintaining a health inventory of blood ” It was written as a result of talk about a potential blood shortage that would occur if people stopped donating due to the COVID-19 virus. It seems the call to Canadians was responded to, however, as I was told this afternoon ... “ T his effort is a marathon, not a sprint ”. As it now stands now, donors are able to attend clinics which are held in Vancouver (2), Victoria, Surrey, and in Kelowna, so I asked if there any plans to re-establish traveling clinics to others communities - for example in Kamloops, Prince George, Prince Rupert, Revelstoke or Cranbrook, and perhaps further north at perhaps Ft. St. John? According to Communications Lead Regional Public Affairs Specialist Marcelo Dominguez, Canadian Blood Services is still on

FEDLSTED -- Rules will have to relax-- the question is how and when

The media has created a fervour over the mathematical models that allegedly help governments predict the future of Coronavirus infections in the general population. Mathematical modelling has limited use and value. We need to understand is that the data available on Coronavirus (COVID-19) infections in Canada is far too small for statistical reliability. The data available for the whole world is useless due to variables in how nations responded to Coronavirus infections. There is no commonality in steps taken to combat virus spread and no similarity in the age demographics of world nations, so the numbers you see on the daily tracking of world infections are not useful in developing a model of infection rates that can be relied on. Mathematical models of the future spread of Coronavirus are better than nothing, but not a whole lot better.  Mathematical models must include assumptions on virus spreads, and various factors involved. As they are used in projections, a small erro

AARON GUNN -- He is, at his core, an ideologue, meaning the facts of any particular issue don’t actually matter

Ben Isitt - City Councillor and Regional Director Victoria City Council and its resident-genius Ben Isitt is back with another dumb idea. Introducing a motion to ban the horse-drawn carriages that have coloured Victoria’s downtown streets for decades, calling them “an outdated mode of transportation”. Are you serious?   No one is actually commuting by horse and carriage. They are here for tourists and residents alike to interact with world-class animals and discover the magic and history of our provincial capital. It’s part of what gives Victoria its charm. And the truth is these horses are treated better than anywhere else in the world. They probably live better lives than many British Columbians.   And talk to anyone who works with these horses and they’ll all tell you the exact same thing: this is what the horses love to do. This is what they were bred for and trained for. This is what gives their lives purpose and meaning. But maybe we shouldn’t be su

Labels

Show more