Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

OLSEN -- It was difficult to stand on the partially deconstructed home in central Vancouver and not think about all the houses that have been landfilled


Over the past several months, I’ve been clear about my concerns with the continued logging of high productivity old-growth. This past Spring, the BC Green Caucus called for a moratorium on logging old-growth hot-spots on Vancouver Island as an initial step.

I think it is important to clarify, though, that there is some old-growth that I fully support harvesting. Much of it is hiding in plain sight in the fully-developed urban landscapes of Metro Vancouver and Greater Victoria.


I am talking about the beautifully preserved old-growth found in many homes built before the 1970’s.   Each year however, more than 1000 such homes are demolished in these communities.

While the City of Vancouver has begun to implement regulations requiring a modest amount of recycling, a vast majority of the material from these homes end up in the landfill. That’s right, not only are we clear-cutting old-growth at unsustainable rates, we are also allowing beautiful old-growth lumber to be demolished and either thrown in a landfill or ground up and used as fuel in an industrial plant.

Though I probably don’t need to clarify this point, this is incredibly wasteful and completely unnecessary. It’s actually unconscionable.


While visiting Vancouver recently, Adam Corneil of the Unbuilders gave me a tour of one of his job sites and highlighted another option that not only is good for the environment but also has social and economic benefits.

Rather than demolishing these homes, Corneil and his team of tradespeople deconstruct houses, layer-by-layer, offering tremendous triple-bottom-line advantages for the property-owner and local governments.

As our landfills near capacity, we must aggressively divert material, especially if it’s not trash!

One quick look at the stack of rough-sawn fir milled from giants several hundred years old confirms they are far from trash.

Deconstruction is the right thing to do!

Once re-harvested, the wood is donated to Habitat for Humanity which then gives the property owner a tax receipt that offsets the cost of the deconstruction. Habitat for Humanity then sells the lumber and uses the revenue to build affordable housing. It’s a beautiful thing! With the federal and provincial tax credits in hand, property-owners not only take pride in their contribution to a wonderful cause but they are also rewarded financially.

It was difficult to stand on the partially deconstructed home in central Vancouver and not think about all the houses that have been landfilled -- and to think that not even 10% of the homes scheduled to be replaced this year will be deconstructed and diverted.


We are still dumping them into landfills at astonishing rates.

As regional governments look to find ways to preserve precious space in their landfills, diverting this material seems like one obvious solution. I believe we need more strict regulations on demolitions and deconstructions. Furthermore, there is likely more that the provincial and federal governments can do to support local governments with appropriate incentives.

There is a tonne of opportunity, and so I am thankful Corneil and his team are investing in exploring the potential.  Now, I hope that all levels of government will step in to ensure we are not needlessly wasting valuable old-growth lumber and filling landfills because. 

As it stands right now, that’s exactly what we are doing.


Adam Olsen ... is a Green Party Member of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia for Saanich North and the Islands. Born in Victoria, BC in 1976, Adam has lived, worked and played his entire life on the Saanich Peninsula. He is a member of Tsartlip First Nation (W̱JOȽEȽP), where he and his wife, Emily, are raising their two children, Silas and Ella.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Kamloops woman’s cancer test cancelled due to Interior Health mandates for OB/GYNs (iNFO News)

A Kamloops woman’s cancer screening appointment was considered urgent by her doctors and scheduled within weeks, but it was postponed indefinitely when Interior Health ordered her gynecologist take that day’s on-call shift. Troylana Manson now waits with the mystery of whether she might have cancer amid a staffing crisis for women’s health care specialists in Kamloops. “I was happy to have that appointment in December so we could rule this out, but now it’s thrown in the air again. People in Kamloops, certainly people in positions of power, need to realize what Interior Health is doing”  ... CLICK HERE for the full story

One arrested at OneBC event at UVic that draws protesters (Times Colonist)

A would-be speaker was arrested under the Trespass Act after she arrived at the University of Victoria on Tuesday for an event intended to shed light on what the OneBC political party refers to as the “reconciliation industry.”  An officer at the scene initially said two people were arrested, after protesters scuffled with those trying to hold the unsanctioned event. Saanich police issued a statement later Tuesday saying only one person was arrested.  Police did not name the person who was arrested, but OneBC leader Dallas Brodie said it was Frances Widdowson, who was later released ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

Eby misled British Columbians about Cowichan appeal; court records show no stay was ever filed; Conservative leader John Rustad

Conservative Opposition Leader John Rustad says Premier David Eby has been caught misleading the public after court records confirmed the government never filed the stay of the Cowichan ruling the NDP repeatedly promised. “For four months, the Premier said the stay was being sought, the Attorney General claimed the application was underway, and the government told British Columbians that action was coming. The court record shows they did nothing,” said Rustad. “Not one stay, not one application, not one motion. They made promises to homeowners while the registry sat empty.” Premier Eby first promised on August 11, 2025, that a stay would be filed, then again in October, and twice in Question Period when pressured by the opposition. A review of court documents on Friday revealed that no stay has been filed. Rustad said the stay was the single legal measure that could pause the ruling and protect homeowners in Richmond and across the province while appeals move forward. By...

Labels

Show more