Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

It's time for those at the top of the BC Conservative Party to lead, follow, or get out of the way



It's interesting -- no actually it's sad -- how the BC Conservative Party seems to bumble from one wrong move to the next.  On December 31st Party President, Ian MacDonald, sent out the latest In House Communicator to 93 Directors of Associations, Regions, Provincial Board and Chairs.  It wasn't long of course before I had been forwarded a copy of the memo, along with the following message:


Alan: Just received your message today and would like to acknowledge your greeting.

... I am forwarding a copy of the latest news release. I remain dumbfounded at the stupidity. Ian MacDonald doesn't appear to be in touch with reality. Threats are probably not the best way to build a party and the whole idea of establishing ones own benchmarks to measure success leave me with my mouth hanging open.

I'm thinking of maybe providing some benchmarks ... All the best for the New Year....

Now here's the text of the message from the BC Conservative Party's Ian MacDonald,  as posted in the "In-House Communicator"



A Word from The President

This is excellent news for the Party because we are finally moving forward. There is still much work to be done, so this is no time for apathy.

From my perspective, we have far too many Constituency Associations doing nothing - no new members, no financial contributions, no involvement with growing the Party. That will all change on January 1, when local entities become accountable to the Party with the introduction of "benchmarks."  If we are going to be a contender in the 2017 Provincial election, everyone has to "lead, follow, or get out of the way."  

We have our AGM coming up on February 20, 2016; it's an important opportunity for each of you to have a direct and immediate impact on the Party. I hope to see you there, in support of our Party, its goals and objectives. If you can't attend personally, please send a donation to support the event.

This newsletter goes out to over 90 Party "leaders" in our Province. I urge each of you to consider running for a Provincial Board position at the AGM. Perhaps you believe you can do better, or that you have something more important to offer; well now is your chance to "step up" and take the lead. 

Working together, let's maintain the momentum begun in 2015; let's build on what we've achieved this year. Through our combined efforts, let's be ready to offer the people of this Province an alternative to the status quo. If not you, then who? If not now, then when? 

With Best Wishes to you and your families for a happy and prosperous New Year.

Sincerely
Ian W. MacDonald, President
BC Conservative Party



Honestly, there really is nothing new -- as usual -- except for a rather heavy handed reference to 'Benchmarks", that he and the Party are now planning to impose on the few remaining willing workers.

My FIRST question would be, "Where are the benchmarks for the Board and Executive?".  Where is the election readiness team, where is the social media campaign, where are the newsworthy media releases, where is the campaign war-chest.  And of equal importance, what success has there been in bringing former and disillusioned members back into the Party?

Those truly are the benchmarks that MEMBERS should be asking these individuals about ... and I doubt VERY MUCH if there has been any success in any of those areas.

Further, talk if trying to save money on postage for the AGM only leads to further questions on the finances of the BC Conservatives.

Personally, for one sitting outside the party (and not because I want to be), getting a new team in place can't happen fast enough!  That said, Ian is right about one thing in his missive to those 90 individuals who got his memo, "If not you, then who? If not now, then when?" 

It's time for those at the top of the BC Conservative Party to lead, follow, or get out of the way.

Well those are my thoughts today.  I'm sure those at the top of the BC Conservative Party will be thinking their own very shortly, once they see and hear about this.  Meantime, please feel free to share your own thoughts in the Comments section below.

In Kamloops, I'm Alan Forseth.

Comments

  1. I wish I was able to to take exception to your comments, Alan, but regrettably I cannot. I have being trying for more than a year to 'get through' to to the BCCP Executive concerning what is required to run a viable and accountable political party - and ultimately win enough votes to elect MLA's. All productive suggestions continue to fall on deaf ears and a virtually unelected Board continues to believe that it has some mandate to represent the membership - when in fact it has none.

    This continuing disconnect with reality would be funny - if it was not so sad. More than once I have suggested to the Board that it cannot expect the BCCP and its CA's to increase membership and generate an election war chest without supportable policies and a vision that resonates with BC voters. Sadly, the truth is that leadership is lacking - and there is no vision.

    The membership has one last chance to restore the BCCP to an acceptable level of respect and purpose and it is all too apparent that the necessary changes cannot take place with the prevailing unelected Board at the helm.

    "Leaders become great, not because of their power, but because of their ability to empower others". John Maxwell

    The current Board, while comprised mainly of 'nice', well-intentioned people, is deluding itself if it thinks it has done a good job. I defy the Board to identify even one matter in which it has furthered the interests of the BCCP. And no, Ian, Ian and Dan, a horribly flawed and draconian constitutional and bylaw document that further divides the BCCP is not a 'shining light' to which you can proudly point.

    Collectively, as a Board, you have not led, you have not followed ideas, suggestions and initiatives that would have benefitted the BCCP and given us the outside chance for a respectable showing at the next election and yes, it is time for you to get out of the way.

    I urge all members who truly care about the BCCP as well as the political necessity to have a meaningful and accountable small 'c' conservative perspective in BC to find some way to attend the forthcoming AGM in Richmond February 20th. Only with the support and vote of the committed BCCP members who are feeling alienated and disenfranchised by the current unelected Board can we attempt to right a floundering ship about to destroy itself on the rocks by a group of self-congratulatory, self-aggrandizing individuals who do not represent the general membership nor the interests of the BCCP and ultimately the voters of British Columbia.

    It is time for all good men and women to come to the aid of the party.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I couldn't agree with you more Glen ... well said

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...

Labels

Show more