Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Practically speaking, manslaughter is when someone is doing something wrong, and someone else ends up dead as a result



Yesterday brought us more news on the Fentanyl front.  In a story from the Victoria Times Colonist, it was said that ... "B.C. Health Minister Terry Lake lies awake at night worrying and wondering why the federal government is allowing other countries to smuggle deadly fentanyl into our country.

“There’s a headline in the Kamloops paper today,” Lake said in an interview last Friday. “A young man at a wedding using cocaine and he died. And this is a story we’ve heard again and again and again. That is not addiction. This is poisoning.”

I took a few minutes, this morning to head to my trusty research tool, Google, to check a few facts regarding Fentanyl, and came up with two things I wanted to share"

BC Coroners Service: "Illicit Drug Overdose Deaths in BC"
There were 555 apparent illicit drug overdose deaths from Jan to Sep 2016. This is a 60.9% increase over the number of death occurring during the same period in 2015 (345). Individuals aged 19-29 and 30-39 have accounted for the largest percentage of illicit drug overdose deaths from Jan – Sep 2016 (25.4% and 28.5%, respectively).

'An exceptionally high toll': Fentanyl, overdoses claim 488 in BC. 488 deaths represents a 61.6 per cent increase compared the same time period last year
the province's chief coroner is warning against complacency in tackling the fentanyl epidemic.  "There is little good news to share," Lisa Lapointe told a news conference held to announce the latest statistics on the toll of the opioid epidemic. According to the latest figures, there were 488 apparent illicit drug overdose deaths in B.C. from January to August 2016.


You read that right.  Five Hundred And Fifty Five deaths from drug overdoses in NINE MONTHS (a 61% increase) ... and look at the ages of the largest two groups.  Young adults ... and the second in a group that are likely married, and perhaps with young children.  No wonder Lisa Lapointe said, "There is little good news to share."

I've said this before, and I'll say it again, there is ONLY one solution that is going to get the makers, and distributors, of this deadly drug off the street.  CHARGE THEM WITH NO LESS THAN MANSLAUGHTER.   

And the law backs me up on this ... 100%.


Another Google search for Manslaughter sent me to the website for the law firm of Mark Zinck, and an article titled "Murder, Manslaughter, and Criminal Negligence Causing Death, where they clearly outline what Manslaughter is:

Any "culpable homicide" that does not meet the definition of murder is said to be manslaughter. Culpable homicide is defined to include when a person causes the death of another human being by:
(a) by means of an unlawful act;
(b) by criminal negligence;

Manslaughter is reserved for killings where the level of intent is less than murder. Practically speaking, manslaughter is when someone is doing something wrong and someone else ends up dead as a result of it -and- the offender did not intend to kill or cause significant bodily harm that he knew may result in death.

And, what's the penalty for Manslaughter?  Well the article goes on to say:

Unlike for murder, manslaughter does not carry an automatic sentence of life imprisonment. It remains, however, an option for the court.

Back in late August, I asked a political friend (of the left-leaning persuasion), the following question:
With your legal background, I wonder if I might ask a question of you. If this drug (fentanyl) is being shown it is causing deaths, is there any reason why the manufacturers / sellers of it, could not be charged with manslaughter ...or is that a crazy idea. Just wondering.

He replied saying:
It's a complicated legal question. Quite complex and difficult to prosecute - all kinds problems. I do think and would like to see a prosecutor test it by going after a trafficker. Users are also voluntarily assuming risk by purchasing and using illegal drugs, yet another issue.

So, I have to ask, why can't we have a test case ... but more importantly, why haven't we already?  The law backs up the fact that charges could be laid, it is after all murder.

I honestly don't know how many more we're going to have to see before these murders, manufacturing and distributing fentanyl, finally get charged.  Or perhaps the courts and legal system are too afraid to try.

Are they afraid?  I don't know, but it's time for us to demand this charge be laid because it is well overdue!

In Kamloops, I'm Alan Forseth
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nurses Take Job Action After Years of NDP Neglect

Image Credit:  BC Nurses Union BC nurses have reached a breaking point after years of unsafe conditions, rising violence in the workplace and a government that wouldn’t listen. Now they are on the picket line fighting to be heard. Last week, nurses began job action with a 72-hour strike notice, refusing non-essential overtime and stepping back from non-nursing duties. As of Tuesday, they have escalated to picket lines for the first time in decades. This moment was avoidable. It is the result of years of unanswered concerns from the frontline workers who keep our hospitals running. Nurses have been raising the same concerns for years: unsafe staffing levels, rising violence on the job, and a workload no single person should have to carry. None of it is new, and none of it should have taken a strike vote to get the government's attention. "Nurses are exercising their legal right to job action, but it shouldn’t have had to come to this," said Kiel Giddens, MLA for...
Post a Comment
Read more

British Columbians Still Don’t Know Who’s Paying for NDP’s BC Hydro Deal

The NDP is making billion-dollar promises with BC Hydro, but British Columbians still don’t know who will pay the bill. Last week’s memorandum of understanding isn’t what the federal government and the NDP are making it out to be. It’s an admission that the NDP failed to make the long-term investments needed to keep B.C. powered. Now British Columbians have serious questions about the cost and whether BC Hydro ratepayers will end up paying the price. David L. Williams, MLA for Salmon Arm-Shuswap and Shadow Minister for BC Hydro and Electrical Energy Development , said British Columbians deserve clear answers about the full implications of the Canada–British Columbia Cooperative Prosperity Agreement. “British Columbians deserve the full truth,” said Mr. Williams. “This multi-billion-dollar announcement does not answer who pays for cost overruns, who pays for new generation, who carries the risk if industrial customers do not materialize, or whether ratepayers will be forced ...
Post a Comment
Read more

NDP Government Blames Everyone but Themselves

The federal government has announced new measures to support British Columbia's forestry sector, including $65 million in funding for projects across the province. While any support is welcome, it falls far short of the level of assistance other provinces have secured for key industries. Conservative Forests Critic Ward Stamer says the NDP government needs to take responsibility for its mismanagement of B.C.’s forest industry instead of trying to pass on the blame. Despite promising to create more jobs in the forest sector, the NDP government has overseen the loss of thousands of forestry jobs and 21 mill closures which have devastated communities. “If Premier Eby spent more time addressing the regulatory issues impacting the forestry sector than he did complaining about the federal government, we would not be in the position we are now,” said Stamer. “And instead of trying to place the blame for mill closures on Donald Trump, Minister of Forests Ravi Parmar should t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more