Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Practically speaking, manslaughter is when someone is doing something wrong, and someone else ends up dead as a result



Yesterday brought us more news on the Fentanyl front.  In a story from the Victoria Times Colonist, it was said that ... "B.C. Health Minister Terry Lake lies awake at night worrying and wondering why the federal government is allowing other countries to smuggle deadly fentanyl into our country.

“There’s a headline in the Kamloops paper today,” Lake said in an interview last Friday. “A young man at a wedding using cocaine and he died. And this is a story we’ve heard again and again and again. That is not addiction. This is poisoning.”

I took a few minutes, this morning to head to my trusty research tool, Google, to check a few facts regarding Fentanyl, and came up with two things I wanted to share"

BC Coroners Service: "Illicit Drug Overdose Deaths in BC"
There were 555 apparent illicit drug overdose deaths from Jan to Sep 2016. This is a 60.9% increase over the number of death occurring during the same period in 2015 (345). Individuals aged 19-29 and 30-39 have accounted for the largest percentage of illicit drug overdose deaths from Jan – Sep 2016 (25.4% and 28.5%, respectively).

'An exceptionally high toll': Fentanyl, overdoses claim 488 in BC. 488 deaths represents a 61.6 per cent increase compared the same time period last year
the province's chief coroner is warning against complacency in tackling the fentanyl epidemic.  "There is little good news to share," Lisa Lapointe told a news conference held to announce the latest statistics on the toll of the opioid epidemic. According to the latest figures, there were 488 apparent illicit drug overdose deaths in B.C. from January to August 2016.


You read that right.  Five Hundred And Fifty Five deaths from drug overdoses in NINE MONTHS (a 61% increase) ... and look at the ages of the largest two groups.  Young adults ... and the second in a group that are likely married, and perhaps with young children.  No wonder Lisa Lapointe said, "There is little good news to share."

I've said this before, and I'll say it again, there is ONLY one solution that is going to get the makers, and distributors, of this deadly drug off the street.  CHARGE THEM WITH NO LESS THAN MANSLAUGHTER.   

And the law backs me up on this ... 100%.


Another Google search for Manslaughter sent me to the website for the law firm of Mark Zinck, and an article titled "Murder, Manslaughter, and Criminal Negligence Causing Death, where they clearly outline what Manslaughter is:

Any "culpable homicide" that does not meet the definition of murder is said to be manslaughter. Culpable homicide is defined to include when a person causes the death of another human being by:
(a) by means of an unlawful act;
(b) by criminal negligence;

Manslaughter is reserved for killings where the level of intent is less than murder. Practically speaking, manslaughter is when someone is doing something wrong and someone else ends up dead as a result of it -and- the offender did not intend to kill or cause significant bodily harm that he knew may result in death.

And, what's the penalty for Manslaughter?  Well the article goes on to say:

Unlike for murder, manslaughter does not carry an automatic sentence of life imprisonment. It remains, however, an option for the court.

Back in late August, I asked a political friend (of the left-leaning persuasion), the following question:
With your legal background, I wonder if I might ask a question of you. If this drug (fentanyl) is being shown it is causing deaths, is there any reason why the manufacturers / sellers of it, could not be charged with manslaughter ...or is that a crazy idea. Just wondering.

He replied saying:
It's a complicated legal question. Quite complex and difficult to prosecute - all kinds problems. I do think and would like to see a prosecutor test it by going after a trafficker. Users are also voluntarily assuming risk by purchasing and using illegal drugs, yet another issue.

So, I have to ask, why can't we have a test case ... but more importantly, why haven't we already?  The law backs up the fact that charges could be laid, it is after all murder.

I honestly don't know how many more we're going to have to see before these murders, manufacturing and distributing fentanyl, finally get charged.  Or perhaps the courts and legal system are too afraid to try.

Are they afraid?  I don't know, but it's time for us to demand this charge be laid because it is well overdue!

In Kamloops, I'm Alan Forseth
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...
Post a Comment
Read more

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more