Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

You'd be welcome to call it the Twigg Formula - a system that would put the peoples' interests First



Through-out the province of BC recently, there has been much talk about electoral reform --- what it should look like, how it will be achieved, how we as
BC Attorney General David Eby (right), campaigning
in May 2017. The BC NDP promised to hold a
referendum on a new voting system for the province
voters will have input to the process, what a referendum question(s) should look like, what kind of majority would be required to have a change made.  These, just to name a few, are the questions being asked.

For many, the name John Twigg will be familiar.  He recently submitted his thoughts to the BC governments Citizen Engagement, as well as forwarding those thoughts to me, Bob Makin, Bill Tieleman (co-chair of the No B.C. Proportional Representation Society), the BC Pundit, and BC NDP Attorney General David Eby.

Here are those thoughts:


The NDP does have "democratic" in its name but its past and present practices too often have shown that that can be a misnomer.

I want a reformed electoral system that will still tend to elect majority governments composed mainly of people of all races, creeds, genders etc representing clearly distinct regions geographically, with very little if any gerrymandering such as Gracie's notorious finger.

The current range of population per riding needs to adjusted because there are too many big ridings with too-few people; they need to be consolidated and the MLAs and candidates specially assisted with travel costs.

I'd like to see a Legislature of up to 99 or 100 seats and no more (at least for a few elections), which would include about 90 people elected in territories as now (except with the above-mentioned population adjustments) and about 10 people chosen in one or more processes to reflect smaller parties, ethnic groups, regional interests, maybe gender balance, maybe talent and/or popularity (eg someone who lost a seat by 10 votes or so). Perhaps some could be chosen by an independent panel chaired by the chief electoral officer. Perhaps some could be selected in a subsequent election off of a list.


These 10 "proportional" MLAs would have full voice in the Legislature and powers to sit on committees and have offices and staff, etc., but their voting powers in the Legislature would be limited so they could not defeat a government or defeat a budget - but they could have a positive impact, especially if Question Period was extended and this group was given a rotating turn. And if there was a tied count on a confidence vote THEN they could break the tie.

The idea that (for example) the Green Party should have 15% of the seats and votes because their candidates collectively pulled 15% of the popular vote is NOT a good idea and in fact is a very bad idea and is NOT "democratic" but instead over-weighs minority special interests. This has proven to be a disaster in several European countries. Likewise any gender quotas or orientation, ethnic or religion quotas - NO!

The idea that the BC Conservative Party should get 7% of the seats because its candidates pulled in 7% of the vote is even more ludicrous. Perhaps the threshold for such seats should be 10% of the provincial popular vote.

The British Parliamentary System that the BC Legislature follows and imitates has proven to be an efficient way for governments to govern with a balance of both pragmatic practicality and intellectual and political diversity. It should be retained but augmented to better reflect B.C.'s diverse population and geography.

And then there is the elephant in the room: new voting technologies. Maybe even instant universal referendums on issues of the day or week.

So I favour an evolution to be revisited as soon as practicable after it has had a chance to work, or not.

I'm not sure what label that formula fits best under. You'd be welcome to call it the Twigg Formula - a system that would put the peoples' interests First.

John Twigg
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more