Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Revenues will need to be directed towards programs that are able to mitigate the issues, and human carnage, that arises from the sale of drugs, alcohol, cigarettes, and even gambling and lottery products


On Wednesday July 18th, the Manitoba government outlined key components of its recreational cannabis regulatory regime -- one of those being the Social Responsibility Fee (SRF), which will be imposed on all licensed pot retailers in the province.

Now I am the first one to question ANY new taxes and / or fees, however this is one which I can embrace fully.  That's because the Government of Manitoba has indicated that revenues generated by the SRF will help fund social costs associated with the legalization of cannabis. 

In announcing the new Social Responsibility Fee, Manitoba's Growth, Enterprise and Trade Minister, Blaine Pedersen, stated, “The various health, safety, education and enforcement implications of legalized cannabis fall almost entirely to the provincial level of government.”

Our plan will help cover these provincial costs and also ensure fairness, recognizing the social responsibility retailers must share.” 

As of October 17th, the sale of legal licensed pot will come into effect.  That being the case, then we in British Columbia need to have the same foresight as legislators in the province of Manitoba.

Much like the use (or perhaps better stated misuse) of alcohol, drugs and psychotics like heroin, crack, misused prescription drugs, crystal meth, and cocaine ... the use and misuse of pot can also have SERIOUS side effects.  And despite the fact that many claim cannabis is safe, and we need not worry, there are warnings that should be heeded.  The government of Canada, itself, states that the consumption of cannabis, like alcohol and tobacco, poses a number of health risks. 

The website Cannabis in Canada, Get The Facts, says that women who are pregnant or breast feeding can put the fetus or new born child at risk.  Heavy cannabis use has also been linked to lower birth weight, and there may also be other health risks associated with cannabis use during pregnancy and breastfeeding.

And of course at any age, cannabis use can affect how the way the brain functions, especially those under the age of 25 as the Canadian medical community pointed out to the government during the process to bring about the legalization of pot.

Some have laughed or scoffed at the statement that cannabis can be a habituating drug, however close to 1 in 3 people who use cannabis will develop a problem with their use -- and as many as one in ten can develope an addiction to it. (Volkow ND, Baler RD, Compton WM, Weiss SR. Adverse health effects of marijuana use. N Engl J Med 2014 Jun 5;370(23):2219-27)

Given this, I believe we in British Columbia need to have a program similar to Manitoba's Social Responsibility Fee.  I am concerned however that we do not appear to have anything currently in place (or on the horizon) with regards to the aspect of social responsibility, and the protection and well being of users, their families, and the community at large.

BC's Liquor Distribution Branch, who will be responsible for the distribution of legal cannabis seems to think responsibility ends with:

1) encouraging and supporting the responsible use of our products is a core value of our organization

2) managing a safe, regulated supply chain for pot as they do for liquor ... and ...


3) supporting the key priorities of restricting access to minors, eliminating the criminal element, ensuring health and safety standards, and providing public education. 

Okay ... all good stuff, however none of that actually speaks to generating the revenues needed, to work on improving societal issues that stem from addictions.

Where is BC's Social Responsibility Fee?

News regarding Public Safety around cannabis has all kinds of information to do with licensing, sale and control, distribution, amendments to the motor vehicle act, safety policy decisions and more -- BUT -- where is the news and information about services, and aid, the BC government will provide for those who for whatever reasons use, and then misuse, legal cannabis and other addictives?

Where will the money be for that! 

In a 2012 study (can't find anything newer), researchers from the University of British Columbia, along with Simon Fraser University, sought to discover the value from illegal pot sold in our province.  At that time, they calculated marijuana sold on the black market generated roughly half a billion dollars a year.  That's Five Hundred Million Dollars!

Just calculating a 7% provincial sales tax on the sale of cannabis, based on that figure) -- never mind any additional so-called 'sin-taxes' ... the BC government will generate revenues of $35 million alone.  In Manitoba however, they will have a 9% tax at the wholesale distribution level ... a mark-up of 75 cents per gram ... along with the a “social responsibility fee” of six per cent to be applied to a cannabis retailer’s total annual revenues.

As I stated at the beginning of this piece, 'I am the first one to question any new taxes and fees'.  That said, ensuring the well-being of the people of BC, especially those suffering from additions -- must become a serious priority for our government.  And, it must be funded in a way that will actually see positive results achieved.

Addicts need to be able to access services as soon as they themselves decide they've hit rock bottom, and can't live that lifestyle any longer.  Having to wait for medical care ... recovery beds ... counselors ... medical staff ... medications and the like, can no longer be allowed to happen.  There can't be an Oh I'm sorry but all beds are in use ... or... I'm sorry but no counselors are available ... or anything else of that nature.  Someone with addiction issues doesn't have 3 months, or 6 months, to wait.  In most cases they don't even have a day.

Honourable Judy Darcy, Minister of
Mental Health and Addictions
Earlier this month the government of BC announced a protective umbrella of wraparound services designed to support patients, no matter where they are on their journey to wellness and hope, to be located at St. Paul's Hospital in Vancouver.  In reading about this mental health and addictions care model, it seems like it should be a model employed through-out the province.

To do that however, revenues will need to be directed towards programs that are able to mitigate issues caused by a dependence on addictive substances, and situations.  In other words ... the human carnage that arises from the sale of drugs, alcohol, cigarettes, and even gambling and lottery products. 

I can hear some already saying, "But this problem may only impact a small segment of British Columbians."  Never the less, the long-term costs to society (in not helping them), will always be far greater than providing what is needed in a well-timed, dependable, and consistent manner. 

The money required for that though, cannot simply be sourced from General Revenues.  Priorities can change, and so can existing program funding.  A dedicated long-term funding stream needs to be established before the government gets too comfortable with the new tax revenues they'll start enjoying once the sale of legal cannabis begins.

Keep in mind however, government will need to maintain existing financial resources being used now for health services.  What I am speaking of must be NEW MONEY from a Social Responsibility Fund, similar to that being implemented by the government of Manitoba.  Anything less than that, and we will not be able to make any claims of having care or compassion for those lost in addiction.

In attempting to get information from our provincial NDP provincial government (Honourable Adrian Dix, Minister of Health and the Honourable Judy Darcy, Minister of Mental Health and Addictions) ... and even our local Kamloops MLA's (Todd Stone - Kamloops South Thompson and Peter Milobar - Kamloops North Thompson) ... I have yet to be able to find out what NEW dedicated funding is being considered for the services I have indicated are needed now.  Services which will be needed even more in the days, weeks, and months following the October 17th date for the legalization of cannabis.

While what I've had to say may not sound like a conservative philosophy to you, remember I've already indicated I belong to an important (and what I believe to be a majority) segment of the conservative movement, the one with a social conscience.  And that my friends, is something that those on the left fail to acknowledge exists.

Care ... or hopelessness ... which one will we as British Columbians demand our government provide?  It's your turn now, to have your say, and I look forward to seeing your thoughts below in the Comment section.

In Kamloops, I'm Alan Forseth

Comments

  1. You're absolutely right and it goes beyond what you're saying. They need housing and support in order to reenter society. It's a long, slow, process that costs money and requires a commitment that spans elections and governments. I think it's money well spent. In the meantime there is very little we can do for those who are not ready or even unable to give it up. Steve and I talked about this last night. Charter rights extend to those with addictions living on the street. You can't just section them and put them into care no matter how much sense it might seem to make. I think in those cases it would be ineffective much of the time anyway.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH: Without a strong local presence, there is NO reason for anyone to tune in to local(?) radio

LOCAL HOMETOWN RADIO IS DYING … and without serious measures put in place, it will likely never see the light of day again. For well over four decades, the Canadian Radio and Television Commission (CRTC) has presided over its’ demise, and for that I say, “Shame”. Without out a word to say enough was enough, the CRTC has allowed corporate Canada to buy up one radio station after the other, and then allowed them to slash staff to the point where some so-called local radio stations do nothing more than air programming that originates from communities well outside the region in which they are located. Case in point?   On CHNL* 610 in Kamloops, the morning show hosted by Vinnie and Randi, DOES NOT originate from Kamloops -- it doesn’t even originate here in BC. It’s a program that Stingray airs across multiple radio stations in Western Canada. It doesn’t end there. Not only are Vinnie and Rando doing mornings on CHNL, but they also show up on sister station Country 103 … and of course o...

Conservative Economic Team Responds to Urgent Industry Concerns

 " For far too long, the BC NDP has ignored the economic challenges facing British Columbians. Manufacturing jobs are vanishing, forestry is in decline, and private sector employment growth has stagnated. Meanwhile, affordability has worsened for both families and businesses. British Columbians deserve better, and we’re here to deliver real solutions to rebuild our economy and create jobs that support everyday working people and their families ." – Gavin Dew, MLA and Shadow Minister for Jobs, Economy, Development, and Innovation.   December 3, 2024, Vancouver, BC – The Conservative economic team met today with business leaders and stakeholders to tackle critical issues impacting British Columbia’s economy. Attended by 9 critics from the Conservative Caucus, this meeting was convened by MLA Gavin Dew – Shadow Minister for Jobs, Economic Development, and Innovation - as a direct response to an October 30th open letter from seven of the province’s largest industry associations. ...

WARD STAMER -- We need certainly in our markets, and certainly in our fibre supply, before we no longer have a forest industry in this province

Image Government of BC I think we all realize that the threat of Trump’s 25% tariff is like other provocative statements he’s made in the past. That said, we should have reason to be concerned. Tariffs don’t benefit anyone. A tariff of that magnitude – included on our own softwood lumber exports, will make things more expensive for Americans, and cause friction in the supply chain. If imposed, a twenty-five percent tariff will be equally detrimental to the citizens and economy of the United States, as well as the people of BC. There are two things, however, of equal concern to the threat of punitive tariffs by incoming U.S. President-elect Donald Trump. One is our antiquated stumpage fees. It is a legacy from decades ago, and one incapable of responding to changing market conditions. We need to revamp our stumpage system to better reflect market conditions, and our economic costs. Instead, a value-added tax system will be instantly responsive to current market conditions and will encou...

Labels

Show more