Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Revenues will need to be directed towards programs that are able to mitigate the issues, and human carnage, that arises from the sale of drugs, alcohol, cigarettes, and even gambling and lottery products


On Wednesday July 18th, the Manitoba government outlined key components of its recreational cannabis regulatory regime -- one of those being the Social Responsibility Fee (SRF), which will be imposed on all licensed pot retailers in the province.

Now I am the first one to question ANY new taxes and / or fees, however this is one which I can embrace fully.  That's because the Government of Manitoba has indicated that revenues generated by the SRF will help fund social costs associated with the legalization of cannabis. 

In announcing the new Social Responsibility Fee, Manitoba's Growth, Enterprise and Trade Minister, Blaine Pedersen, stated, “The various health, safety, education and enforcement implications of legalized cannabis fall almost entirely to the provincial level of government.”

Our plan will help cover these provincial costs and also ensure fairness, recognizing the social responsibility retailers must share.” 

As of October 17th, the sale of legal licensed pot will come into effect.  That being the case, then we in British Columbia need to have the same foresight as legislators in the province of Manitoba.

Much like the use (or perhaps better stated misuse) of alcohol, drugs and psychotics like heroin, crack, misused prescription drugs, crystal meth, and cocaine ... the use and misuse of pot can also have SERIOUS side effects.  And despite the fact that many claim cannabis is safe, and we need not worry, there are warnings that should be heeded.  The government of Canada, itself, states that the consumption of cannabis, like alcohol and tobacco, poses a number of health risks. 

The website Cannabis in Canada, Get The Facts, says that women who are pregnant or breast feeding can put the fetus or new born child at risk.  Heavy cannabis use has also been linked to lower birth weight, and there may also be other health risks associated with cannabis use during pregnancy and breastfeeding.

And of course at any age, cannabis use can affect how the way the brain functions, especially those under the age of 25 as the Canadian medical community pointed out to the government during the process to bring about the legalization of pot.

Some have laughed or scoffed at the statement that cannabis can be a habituating drug, however close to 1 in 3 people who use cannabis will develop a problem with their use -- and as many as one in ten can develope an addiction to it. (Volkow ND, Baler RD, Compton WM, Weiss SR. Adverse health effects of marijuana use. N Engl J Med 2014 Jun 5;370(23):2219-27)

Given this, I believe we in British Columbia need to have a program similar to Manitoba's Social Responsibility Fee.  I am concerned however that we do not appear to have anything currently in place (or on the horizon) with regards to the aspect of social responsibility, and the protection and well being of users, their families, and the community at large.

BC's Liquor Distribution Branch, who will be responsible for the distribution of legal cannabis seems to think responsibility ends with:

1) encouraging and supporting the responsible use of our products is a core value of our organization

2) managing a safe, regulated supply chain for pot as they do for liquor ... and ...


3) supporting the key priorities of restricting access to minors, eliminating the criminal element, ensuring health and safety standards, and providing public education. 

Okay ... all good stuff, however none of that actually speaks to generating the revenues needed, to work on improving societal issues that stem from addictions.

Where is BC's Social Responsibility Fee?

News regarding Public Safety around cannabis has all kinds of information to do with licensing, sale and control, distribution, amendments to the motor vehicle act, safety policy decisions and more -- BUT -- where is the news and information about services, and aid, the BC government will provide for those who for whatever reasons use, and then misuse, legal cannabis and other addictives?

Where will the money be for that! 

In a 2012 study (can't find anything newer), researchers from the University of British Columbia, along with Simon Fraser University, sought to discover the value from illegal pot sold in our province.  At that time, they calculated marijuana sold on the black market generated roughly half a billion dollars a year.  That's Five Hundred Million Dollars!

Just calculating a 7% provincial sales tax on the sale of cannabis, based on that figure) -- never mind any additional so-called 'sin-taxes' ... the BC government will generate revenues of $35 million alone.  In Manitoba however, they will have a 9% tax at the wholesale distribution level ... a mark-up of 75 cents per gram ... along with the a “social responsibility fee” of six per cent to be applied to a cannabis retailer’s total annual revenues.

As I stated at the beginning of this piece, 'I am the first one to question any new taxes and fees'.  That said, ensuring the well-being of the people of BC, especially those suffering from additions -- must become a serious priority for our government.  And, it must be funded in a way that will actually see positive results achieved.

Addicts need to be able to access services as soon as they themselves decide they've hit rock bottom, and can't live that lifestyle any longer.  Having to wait for medical care ... recovery beds ... counselors ... medical staff ... medications and the like, can no longer be allowed to happen.  There can't be an Oh I'm sorry but all beds are in use ... or... I'm sorry but no counselors are available ... or anything else of that nature.  Someone with addiction issues doesn't have 3 months, or 6 months, to wait.  In most cases they don't even have a day.

Honourable Judy Darcy, Minister of
Mental Health and Addictions
Earlier this month the government of BC announced a protective umbrella of wraparound services designed to support patients, no matter where they are on their journey to wellness and hope, to be located at St. Paul's Hospital in Vancouver.  In reading about this mental health and addictions care model, it seems like it should be a model employed through-out the province.

To do that however, revenues will need to be directed towards programs that are able to mitigate issues caused by a dependence on addictive substances, and situations.  In other words ... the human carnage that arises from the sale of drugs, alcohol, cigarettes, and even gambling and lottery products. 

I can hear some already saying, "But this problem may only impact a small segment of British Columbians."  Never the less, the long-term costs to society (in not helping them), will always be far greater than providing what is needed in a well-timed, dependable, and consistent manner. 

The money required for that though, cannot simply be sourced from General Revenues.  Priorities can change, and so can existing program funding.  A dedicated long-term funding stream needs to be established before the government gets too comfortable with the new tax revenues they'll start enjoying once the sale of legal cannabis begins.

Keep in mind however, government will need to maintain existing financial resources being used now for health services.  What I am speaking of must be NEW MONEY from a Social Responsibility Fund, similar to that being implemented by the government of Manitoba.  Anything less than that, and we will not be able to make any claims of having care or compassion for those lost in addiction.

In attempting to get information from our provincial NDP provincial government (Honourable Adrian Dix, Minister of Health and the Honourable Judy Darcy, Minister of Mental Health and Addictions) ... and even our local Kamloops MLA's (Todd Stone - Kamloops South Thompson and Peter Milobar - Kamloops North Thompson) ... I have yet to be able to find out what NEW dedicated funding is being considered for the services I have indicated are needed now.  Services which will be needed even more in the days, weeks, and months following the October 17th date for the legalization of cannabis.

While what I've had to say may not sound like a conservative philosophy to you, remember I've already indicated I belong to an important (and what I believe to be a majority) segment of the conservative movement, the one with a social conscience.  And that my friends, is something that those on the left fail to acknowledge exists.

Care ... or hopelessness ... which one will we as British Columbians demand our government provide?  It's your turn now, to have your say, and I look forward to seeing your thoughts below in the Comment section.

In Kamloops, I'm Alan Forseth

Comments

  1. You're absolutely right and it goes beyond what you're saying. They need housing and support in order to reenter society. It's a long, slow, process that costs money and requires a commitment that spans elections and governments. I think it's money well spent. In the meantime there is very little we can do for those who are not ready or even unable to give it up. Steve and I talked about this last night. Charter rights extend to those with addictions living on the street. You can't just section them and put them into care no matter how much sense it might seem to make. I think in those cases it would be ineffective much of the time anyway.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more