Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FORSETH: Maybe it’s just me, and I’m tilting at windmills, but this doesn’t seems like a good start to this new organization

 




 

IT SEEMS LIKE Bill Miller is having a hard time following instructions.

Who is Bill Miller you ask? Well, he is the former Executive Director of the Kamloops branch of Habitat For Human, a branch which the National organization disaffiliated themselves from on October 13th, 2022.

A news story in Kamloops This Week (October 19th, 2022) reported that:
 

Privately selling homes and a lack of financial transparency were among the reasons Habitat for Humanity Canada cited for stripping the Kamloops non-profit branch of its affiliation with the national organization.

Habitat Canada is providing more details over its decision to disaffiliate Habitat for Humanity Kamloops, which was effective as of Oct. 13.

The decision means Habitat Kamloops can no longer use that brand and must remove the name and logo from all of its social media accounts, advertising and other assets. As of Tuesday, they remained on Habitat Kamloops’ website and Facebook pages.

That seems pretty straight-forward to me ... disaffiliated ... and ... no longer use the name and logo (of Habitat For Humanity).

And yet, at the end of April an organization calling itself the Attainable Housing Development Society (AHDS), which according to their website is led by CEO of Project Development Bill Miller, sent out a mailer with an envelope using the Habitat For Humanity Kamloops logo – this despite, as noted above, being ordered not to do so.

The former Kamloops branch of Habitat for Humanity, led by Bill Miller, seemed to have been mired in a number of issues prior to being disaffiliated by the national organization – I won’t list them all here, however, a simple Google search will bring them up for you (just click the 'News' tab). That is why there are several things that bother me about this whole situation.

Despite being ordered not to do so, AHDS sent out a mailer in a Habitat for Humanity logo’d envelope, which included lettering about the ‘Annual Classic Car Raffle’.

So how did they have my personal address to send this too?  It was because they had me on a mailing list for people who had previously purchased a Classic Car Raffle lottery ticket.

That list would have been the property of Habitat For Humanity – NOT the Attainable Housing Development Society.  

I object to that as I did not give permission for them to keep and/or maintain my contact information.


As well, inside the mailing was a promo piece for this new society which stated:

“We are excited to announce that we have changed our name to Attainable Housing Development Society.  With our new name and image, we are renewing our commitment to providing attainable housing to communities through-out BC”.

It would seem to me that given the old Kamloops branch of Habitat For Humanity was ordered to cease using the national name, and material, OVER a year and a half ago, they didn’t in fact change their name ... Habitat was NO LONGER their name to use, or change from.

Would that in fact then not be disingenuous or lacking in candor?

Merriam Webster says a ... disingenuous remark might contain some superficial truth, but it is delivered with the intent to deceive or to serve some hidden purpose.

Do you think that description fits?

I know that a Kamloops reporter reached out to Habitat For Humanity as I provided them with the information on this situation. This was confirmed by Sarah Varley (Vice President, Communications & Partnerships, Habitat for Humanity Canada) who told me by email that they had told the reporter that:

“... we confirmed that Habitat for Humanity Kamloops was disaffiliated effective October 13, 2022, and required to remove all Habitat branding from all channels, property and other assets. They have been repeatedly advised not to use the Habitat brand and we are surprised to hear that they would be inappropriately using this letterhead."
 
She went on to say, “We appreciate you making us aware of this situation and we will be following up with them to request that they cease using the Habitat brand in their mailings and all other communications immediately. If you haven’t already done so, we recommend that you ask them to remove you from their mailing list.”

I called the number for the Attainable Housing Development Society today to ask why I had received their mailer, and indeed I was told it was because I had previously purchased a Habitat For Humanity Kamloops car raffle ticket.

I also asked why they were saying the had changed their name ... and why they were using a Habitat For Humanity mailing list ... AND ... why they were still using the Habitat For Humanity logo they had been ordered to no longer use.

The lady I spoke with said I was just misunderstanding things.

I don’t in fact think I misunderstood anything.

Maybe it’s just me, and I’m tilting at windmills, but this doesn’t seems like a good start to this new organization ... and I certainly won’t be buying one of their tickets for their new home raffle, which they are now advertising for, and promoting on their website.

In Kamloops, I’m Alan Forseth.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 
Post a Comment
Read more

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more