Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

WILL KAMLOOPS CITY COUNCIL be able to cajole builders to build more than they currently are?

 


Yesterday (May 31st), the provincial government announced housing target expectations, which they say will deliver more homes faster, and announced the first communities they have selected for this honour(?) – Kamloops was on that list

The act enables compliance options as a last resort,
should municipalities struggle to create the conditions
that are necessary to ensure housing gets built.

 

As of May 30th, Kamloops City Council is already on record regarding provincial government interference in local government land use.

A motion from Kamloops City Councillor Nancy Bepple called on the provincial government to “... not interfere with local government land use decision-making authority in regard to increasing housing supply through the Home for People action plan ...”

It also stated that the City of Kamloops wishes to retain its jurisdiction over land use for housing.

That motion passed.

When I asked Nancy if there was anything else important to her on this issue she remarked:

“Kamloops needs more housing. The City of Kamloops and the Province agree on this.

There are many good parts to the provincial Housing for People plan to help meet this goal. My concern about the plan, backed up by my resolution passed by council, is that local decision making for land use is important. I don’t want the province imposing zoning across the City of Kamloops.”

Meantime BC United Shadow Minister for Housing Karin Kirkpatrick said yesterday, “It’s clear that B.C. needs vastly more housing, but it’s incredibly disingenuous for this NDP government to pretend that they are not part of the problem. Number one on this housing naughty list should be David Eby and his NDP government.”

Today I spoke with the BC United Shadow Minister for Finance and MLA for Kamloops North Thompson, and asked what he thought about Kamloops being included on the list of cities targeted by the provincial government, with expectation that they should build more housing.

Peter Milobar, who is also a former three term Mayor of Kamloops, had this to say:

“There are many unanswered questions on how this will work and how, in a tight labour market, Kamloops City Council will be able to cajole builders to build more than they currently are.

More importantly the current NDP government has a lot of the blame for delays in housing with their own stalling of Provincial permits, and increased costs, given the multiple provincial taxes on new home construction.

This seems like a way for the NDP government of David Eby to move attention away from the fact that six years into their ten-year housing plan, they have only delivered twelve percent of that plan.

This has become typical of this government; make an announcement, without any details, and point the finger of blame elsewhere.”.

From all accounts, it seems that Kamloops is doing just fine, thank you very much.

With that in mind, perhaps it’s time that the provincial government got its’ own house in order when it comes to housing that IT has committed itself to, rather than coming down with a heavy hammer on other levels of government.

What thoughts do you have on this matter?

In Kamloops, I’m Alan Forseth. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC’s Forestry Decline Is a Policy Failure, Not a Market Reality -- Forestry Critic Calls for Accountability and Urgent Policy Reset

Conservative Party of BC Forestry Critic, and Kamloops - North Thompson MLA,  Ward Stamer As the Truck Loggers Association convention begins today, BC Conservative Forestry Critic Ward Stamer says British Columbia’s forestry crisis is the result of government mismanagement, not market forces, and that an urgent policy reset is needed to restore certainty, sustainability, and accountability. “For generations, forestry supported families and communities across BC,” said Stamer.  “Today, mills are closing, contractors are parking equipment, and families are being forced to leave home, not because the resource is gone, but because policy has failed.” Government data shows timber shipment values dropped by more than half a billion dollars in the past year, with harvest levels falling by roughly 50 per cent in just four years. At the same time, prolonged permitting timelines, unreliable fibre access, outdated forest inventories, and rising costs have made long-term planning impossib...
Post a Comment
Read more

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Eby government signs another land-use agreement, as they say one thing and do another, during DRIPA chaos

While promising to fix DRIPA, the Eby government continues to quietly sign binding land-use agreements that fundamentally alter how Crown land is governed in British Columbia. On January 15, 2026, the government signed four ministerial orders advancing the Gwa’ni Land Use Planning Project with the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, amending the Vancouver Island Land Use Plan and changing how more than 166,000 hectares of Crown land can be accessed, developed, and managed. “This is Land Act reform by stealth,” said Critic for Indigenous Relations Scott McInnis. “British Columbians already rejected these changes once. In 2024, public backlash forced the NDP to pull its Land Act amendments. Instead of listening, this government has gone underground, signing individual deals behind closed doors, just like we’ve already seen in places such as Squamish, Teẑtan Biny, and across Northwest BC.” “The Premier admits DRIPA ( the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act) is creating ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more