Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

SONIA FURSTENAU: NDP plan not exactly a bold solution to the crushing unaffordability of housing in this province


Housing has been in the news this week, with the BC Government announcing their "BC Builds" initiative. Reading through this announcement, we learn that the program is designed to "create housing that is affordable for household incomes from $84,780 to $131,950 for a studio or one-bedroom home, or $134,410 to $191,910 for a two-bedroom home"

Apparently, up to 20% of this housing could be up to 20% below market rent... Not exactly a bold solution to the crushing unaffordability of housing in this province. 

It's clear that 'BC Builds' is aimed at providing housing for people who don't urgently need housing. We're in a serious crisis right now, and housing for people with annual incomes over $80k is not the problem; what's missing is housing for those who earn $60k or less per year. Where do they factor into this proposal?

People are on the verge of homelessness. Taking a look at the Rental Housing Index, you can see that for the two lowest-income groups in our province, housing is not only "unaffordable", but in some cases "severely unaffordable". Surely, these are the groups that an NDP government should be prioritizing. Where is the support for the truly middle-income households, who make up over half of B.C.’s population?

Recently released analysis from the Canadian Mortgage and Housing Commission (CMHC) shows that in Vancouver in 2023, for a minimum-wage worker renting the average bachelor unit, over 50% of their monthly income goes towards rent. In Victoria, a worker earning minimum wage would need to allocate more than 40% of their monthly income to afford the average rent. The report also shows that in Victoria, when rental units with long-term tenants become available, the rent is adjusted to align with current market rates. In 2023, this translated to units becoming 41.5% more expensive for incoming tenants. The Cowichan Valley is not far off these numbers, and the growing desperation in our community is palpable.

Yes, we need more housing. But increasing the supply does not lower the cost of housing, when housing is being financialized. When we let hedge funds and private firms manage housing, the ultimate outcome is profits for investors. The issue here is not simply inadequate supply; it is the lack of actions addressing the core need for non-market housing that everyday people can actually afford. 

Let's treat this crisis with the urgency it deserves. We are calling for immediate help for renters. Local and provincial governments can help by putting the brakes on rental increases between tenancies - because a 41.5% increase in rent could mean more people living on the streets, and even bigger problems for our communities in the years to come. 

Sincerely,
Sonia

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...

Labels

Show more