Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

SONIA FURSTENAU: NDP plan not exactly a bold solution to the crushing unaffordability of housing in this province


Housing has been in the news this week, with the BC Government announcing their "BC Builds" initiative. Reading through this announcement, we learn that the program is designed to "create housing that is affordable for household incomes from $84,780 to $131,950 for a studio or one-bedroom home, or $134,410 to $191,910 for a two-bedroom home"

Apparently, up to 20% of this housing could be up to 20% below market rent... Not exactly a bold solution to the crushing unaffordability of housing in this province. 

It's clear that 'BC Builds' is aimed at providing housing for people who don't urgently need housing. We're in a serious crisis right now, and housing for people with annual incomes over $80k is not the problem; what's missing is housing for those who earn $60k or less per year. Where do they factor into this proposal?

People are on the verge of homelessness. Taking a look at the Rental Housing Index, you can see that for the two lowest-income groups in our province, housing is not only "unaffordable", but in some cases "severely unaffordable". Surely, these are the groups that an NDP government should be prioritizing. Where is the support for the truly middle-income households, who make up over half of B.C.’s population?

Recently released analysis from the Canadian Mortgage and Housing Commission (CMHC) shows that in Vancouver in 2023, for a minimum-wage worker renting the average bachelor unit, over 50% of their monthly income goes towards rent. In Victoria, a worker earning minimum wage would need to allocate more than 40% of their monthly income to afford the average rent. The report also shows that in Victoria, when rental units with long-term tenants become available, the rent is adjusted to align with current market rates. In 2023, this translated to units becoming 41.5% more expensive for incoming tenants. The Cowichan Valley is not far off these numbers, and the growing desperation in our community is palpable.

Yes, we need more housing. But increasing the supply does not lower the cost of housing, when housing is being financialized. When we let hedge funds and private firms manage housing, the ultimate outcome is profits for investors. The issue here is not simply inadequate supply; it is the lack of actions addressing the core need for non-market housing that everyday people can actually afford. 

Let's treat this crisis with the urgency it deserves. We are calling for immediate help for renters. Local and provincial governments can help by putting the brakes on rental increases between tenancies - because a 41.5% increase in rent could mean more people living on the streets, and even bigger problems for our communities in the years to come. 

Sincerely,
Sonia

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more