Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

SONIA FURSTENAU: NDP plan not exactly a bold solution to the crushing unaffordability of housing in this province


Housing has been in the news this week, with the BC Government announcing their "BC Builds" initiative. Reading through this announcement, we learn that the program is designed to "create housing that is affordable for household incomes from $84,780 to $131,950 for a studio or one-bedroom home, or $134,410 to $191,910 for a two-bedroom home"
Apparently, up to 20% of this housing could be up to 20% below market rent... Not exactly a bold solution to the crushing unaffordability of housing in this province. 
It's clear that 'BC Builds' is aimed at providing housing for people who don't urgently need housing. We're in a serious crisis right now, and housing for people with annual incomes over $80k is not the problem; what's missing is housing for those who earn $60k or less per year. Where do they factor into this proposal?
People are on the verge of homelessness. Taking a look at the Rental Housing Index, you can see that for the two lowest-income groups in our province, housing is not only "unaffordable", but in some cases "severely unaffordable". Surely, these are the groups that an NDP government should be prioritizing. Where is the support for the truly middle-income households, who make up over half of B.C.’s population?
Recently released analysis from the Canadian Mortgage and Housing Commission (CMHC) shows that in Vancouver in 2023, for a minimum-wage worker renting the average bachelor unit, over 50% of their monthly income goes towards rent. In Victoria, a worker earning minimum wage would need to allocate more than 40% of their monthly income to afford the average rent. The report also shows that in Victoria, when rental units with long-term tenants become available, the rent is adjusted to align with current market rates. In 2023, this translated to units becoming 41.5% more expensive for incoming tenants. The Cowichan Valley is not far off these numbers, and the growing desperation in our community is palpable.
Yes, we need more housing. But increasing the supply does not lower the cost of housing, when housing is being financialized. When we let hedge funds and private firms manage housing, the ultimate outcome is profits for investors. The issue here is not simply inadequate supply; it is the lack of actions addressing the core need for non-market housing that everyday people can actually afford. 
Let's treat this crisis with the urgency it deserves. We are calling for immediate help for renters. Local and provincial governments can help by putting the brakes on rental increases between tenancies - because a 41.5% increase in rent could mean more people living on the streets, and even bigger problems for our communities in the years to come. 
Sincerely,
Sonia

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...
Post a Comment
Read more

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more