Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

GIESBRECHT: Community engagement is a vital component of democratic governance


As I walked around the Farmers market last Saturday, a few thoughts sprang to mind, which I thought I would share. They involve the benefits of community engagement for the people and politicians.

Community engagement is a dynamic process that involves collaboration, and active participation, between the public and their elected representatives. This interaction fosters a mutually beneficial relationship that positively impacts both citizens and politicians.

Benefits for People

1.   Empowerment and Inclusion: Engaging with residents empowers individuals by giving them a voice in the decisions that affect their lives. When people feel included, they are more likely to participate actively in community affairs, leading to a more cohesive and supportive society.

2.   Improved Public Services: Direct communication with elected officials allows citizens to express their needs and preferences, which helps in tailoring public services to better meet those needs. Whether it's improving local infrastructure, enhancing educational facilities, or addressing public health issues, community engagement ensures that services are aligned with the actual requirements of the community.

3.   Enhanced Relationships: Community engagement fosters relationships and networks among community members. This interaction is invaluable as it leads to stronger community bonds, increased trust, and a collaborative spirit. These elements are essential for addressing community issues collectively and efficiently.

4.   Increased Accountability: When politicians actively engage with the residents of their community, they are more likely to be held accountable for their actions. This accountability ensures that elected officials act in the best interests of their constituents, maintaining transparency and integrity in governance.

 

Benefits for Politicians

1.   Policy Relevance and Effectiveness: Politicians who actively engage with their communities gain deeper insights into the specific needs and challenges faced by their constituents. This knowledge enables them to craft policies that are more relevant and effective, leading to better outcomes and higher public satisfaction.

2.   Building Trust and Credibility: Regular engagement with the community helps politicians build trust and credibility. By being accessible and responsive, politicians can demonstrate their commitment to serving the public, which is crucial for maintaining support and winning elections.

3.   Enhanced Communications: Community engagement provides politicians with direct feedback, allowing them to communicate more effectively. This two-way communication helps in clarifying policies, addressing concerns, and debunking misinformation, leading to a more informed electorate.

4.   Increased Support and Stability: Politicians who engage with their communities are more likely to enjoy sustained support. Engaged citizens are more likely to vote, participate in civic activities, and advocate for their representatives. This support not only helps politicians in their re-election efforts but also in achieving long-term political stability.

 

In conclusion, community engagement is a vital component of democratic governance, which brings significant benefits to both the public, and politicians. For citizens, it means empowerment, improved services, stronger social bonds, and greater accountability. For me it means the opportunity to develop more effective policies, to build enhanced trust and communication, and increased support and stability. This symbiotic relationship is essential for fostering a vibrant, responsive, and resilient community.

I look forward to your feedback on this important topic. Please feel free to contact me at Dennis.giesbrecht@conservativebc.ca.

Dennis Giesbrecht

Dennis Giesbrecht is the Conservative Party of BC candidate for Kamloops – Centre.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more