Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

In the eyes of provincial law going back 175 years, and which is still in use today, a great many lives are considered worthless

 

According to the BC Wrongful Death Law Reform Society the fight for a fair wrongful death law has recently generated considerable media attention in British Columbia, with news outlets across the province reporting on the campaign.

 

I have to admit I was not aware of this campaign, until I saw it on a Global News story out of Vancouver early last week.

 

According to the society, BC’s current Family Compensation Act (FCA) only takes into account the direct financial losses resulting from death, while others who may not represent an immediate financial loss ‘are a class of people whose lives are not fully valued or respected when they are killed in BC’.

 

In other words, a great many lives are worthless in the eyes of B.C. law, a point which was also made several times in the news story I saw. And even though the provincial government has been made aware of the issue over many years, BC’s wrongful death laws, unlike every other province, have not had any meaningful changes that provide a modern standard of human value. 

 

A number of days ago I spoke with a woman who shared the story of her mother who died in care 10 years ago. With a voice filled with emotion, she said to me:

 

‘While I am not part of the group currently trying to get changes made to the legislation, I was incredibly pleased to see the issue in the news.  

 

When my mother died in ‘care’ due to gross negligence on the part of the facility, I spoke to many lawyers, none of whom would touch a wrongful death suit. They all said that, with the current legislation, it was a waste of time and that the only award the court would give would be based on lost income.  

 

I did not wish to profit from my mother’s untimely death; however, I did want to see a financial punishment that would help in bringing about much needed change. The act under which they operate had been contravened in three separate places yet there was nothing that could be done, and no penalties administered. Sadly, despite that, seniors are still in their care.’

 

It certainly seems that often those who wrongfully take the lives of others can enjoy tort immunity – in other words shielded from the consequences of their negligence -- where there is little or no financial cost to those who have lost a family member considered to be a financial dependent. 

 

Meaning, in the eyes of provincial law going back 175 years (1846), and which is still in use today, a great many lives are considered worthless.

 

I have to wonder, as countless others have for some time now, how many more years will this be allowed to continue before our provincial government makes long overdue changes to this situation?

 

Image credit – Stephens and Holman personal injury lawyers. From a commentary posted at https://www.stephensandholman.com/family-compensation-act

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Kamloops woman’s cancer test cancelled due to Interior Health mandates for OB/GYNs (iNFO News)

A Kamloops woman’s cancer screening appointment was considered urgent by her doctors and scheduled within weeks, but it was postponed indefinitely when Interior Health ordered her gynecologist take that day’s on-call shift. Troylana Manson now waits with the mystery of whether she might have cancer amid a staffing crisis for women’s health care specialists in Kamloops. “I was happy to have that appointment in December so we could rule this out, but now it’s thrown in the air again. People in Kamloops, certainly people in positions of power, need to realize what Interior Health is doing”  ... CLICK HERE for the full story

One arrested at OneBC event at UVic that draws protesters (Times Colonist)

A would-be speaker was arrested under the Trespass Act after she arrived at the University of Victoria on Tuesday for an event intended to shed light on what the OneBC political party refers to as the “reconciliation industry.”  An officer at the scene initially said two people were arrested, after protesters scuffled with those trying to hold the unsanctioned event. Saanich police issued a statement later Tuesday saying only one person was arrested.  Police did not name the person who was arrested, but OneBC leader Dallas Brodie said it was Frances Widdowson, who was later released ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

Eby misled British Columbians about Cowichan appeal; court records show no stay was ever filed; Conservative leader John Rustad

Conservative Opposition Leader John Rustad says Premier David Eby has been caught misleading the public after court records confirmed the government never filed the stay of the Cowichan ruling the NDP repeatedly promised. “For four months, the Premier said the stay was being sought, the Attorney General claimed the application was underway, and the government told British Columbians that action was coming. The court record shows they did nothing,” said Rustad. “Not one stay, not one application, not one motion. They made promises to homeowners while the registry sat empty.” Premier Eby first promised on August 11, 2025, that a stay would be filed, then again in October, and twice in Question Period when pressured by the opposition. A review of court documents on Friday revealed that no stay has been filed. Rustad said the stay was the single legal measure that could pause the ruling and protect homeowners in Richmond and across the province while appeals move forward. By...

Labels

Show more