Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

In the eyes of provincial law going back 175 years, and which is still in use today, a great many lives are considered worthless

 

According to the BC Wrongful Death Law Reform Society the fight for a fair wrongful death law has recently generated considerable media attention in British Columbia, with news outlets across the province reporting on the campaign.

 

I have to admit I was not aware of this campaign, until I saw it on a Global News story out of Vancouver early last week.

 

According to the society, BC’s current Family Compensation Act (FCA) only takes into account the direct financial losses resulting from death, while others who may not represent an immediate financial loss ‘are a class of people whose lives are not fully valued or respected when they are killed in BC’.

 

In other words, a great many lives are worthless in the eyes of B.C. law, a point which was also made several times in the news story I saw. And even though the provincial government has been made aware of the issue over many years, BC’s wrongful death laws, unlike every other province, have not had any meaningful changes that provide a modern standard of human value. 

 

A number of days ago I spoke with a woman who shared the story of her mother who died in care 10 years ago. With a voice filled with emotion, she said to me:

 

‘While I am not part of the group currently trying to get changes made to the legislation, I was incredibly pleased to see the issue in the news.  

 

When my mother died in ‘care’ due to gross negligence on the part of the facility, I spoke to many lawyers, none of whom would touch a wrongful death suit. They all said that, with the current legislation, it was a waste of time and that the only award the court would give would be based on lost income.  

 

I did not wish to profit from my mother’s untimely death; however, I did want to see a financial punishment that would help in bringing about much needed change. The act under which they operate had been contravened in three separate places yet there was nothing that could be done, and no penalties administered. Sadly, despite that, seniors are still in their care.’

 

It certainly seems that often those who wrongfully take the lives of others can enjoy tort immunity – in other words shielded from the consequences of their negligence -- where there is little or no financial cost to those who have lost a family member considered to be a financial dependent. 

 

Meaning, in the eyes of provincial law going back 175 years (1846), and which is still in use today, a great many lives are considered worthless.

 

I have to wonder, as countless others have for some time now, how many more years will this be allowed to continue before our provincial government makes long overdue changes to this situation?

 

Image credit – Stephens and Holman personal injury lawyers. From a commentary posted at https://www.stephensandholman.com/family-compensation-act

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...

Labels

Show more