Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FORSETH -- Those younger, and those with lower incomes, less likely to get vaccinated against COVID-19. What are we going to do about it?


The headline of a news story in the Vancouver Sun on Tuesday (May 18th), stated: “Vaccine information not reaching young adults in B.C., poll shows”.

Leading off the article, were the following two sentences:

Age and income are the biggest barrier to getting vaccinated in B.C., according to a poll from Leger. Many of those most likely to be unvaccinated were between 18 and 35, single, or have a household income of less than $40,000, according to the poll.

Let me say, however that ‘age’ and ‘income’ ARE NOT in fact ‘barriers’ ... they are statistics, or indicators, associated with those two groups.

Being young is not a barrier, it simply shows that many who are in that age bracket have yet to receive a vaccine (and that could be for several reasons).

And having a lower income is not in itself a barrier either. There is no cost to get the vaccine and so having a lower income, and not having yet received (or registered) for a vaccine shot is simply a noted fact of reference.

I’m going to go out on a limb and say the reason for these above noted vague -- and suspect -- sentences are due to the fact some may get hurt feelings by reality. In other words, it is not politically correct.

Facts are facts, however.

FACT:  Many, but not all, younger people have not yet had the life experiences that come as we mature. That could include experiences, directly, or indirectly, with serious illnesses. Young people, in general, are more prone to take chances, or engage in riskier behaviour. Adolescence is also characterised by experimentation and risk taking, sometimes with behaviours that may derail current and future health and wellbeing. While it is true that those impacted by COVID-19 are more likely to be older (than them), stories are increasing about those in their 20’s, 30’s, and 40’s becoming seriously ill.

FACT: Those with low levels of education limit their economies’ capacity, negatively impacts social cohesion and mobility, and results in higher spending on public health and social supports. This has been shown to be true in study after study.

Let’s just call a spade a spade, and forget being politically correct.

Those who are younger, and those with lower incomes, are less likely to get vaccinated against COVID-19 ...

NOW ... what are we going to do about it?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more