Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FURSTENAU -- Sick pay is long overdue for workers in BC, and while this bill is inadequate to meet the needs of people, it is a start.

 

This week in the BC Legislature the NDP government passed its legislation to implement a 3-day sick leave program for employees who are ill due to COVID-19, and who work for companies that don't have the capacity to offer sick leave. The legislation also gives the government the ability to implement, through regulation, a permanent sick leave program for the province.

Providing sick pay is long overdue for workers in BC, and while this bill is inadequate to meet the needs of people, it is a start.  

I introduced two amendments to the bill. The first proposed that government bring the permanent program back to the Legislature for review. The second amendment proposed to increase sick leave due to COVID-19 from the proposed 3 days to 5 days.  This would have gone further to bridge the gap between the provincial and federal programs.  

What I had hoped to achieve with the first amendment was to provide the government with the ability to present its plan for permanent sick pay in British Columbia to the Legislative Assembly, and have that plan sent for review to a committee that consists of members from all of the parties. 

Of course, as government has a majority, they would have the majority on that committee. However, it gives the opportunity for debate and the capacity for there to be the kinds of questions that we should all expect before legislation that passes in this House.

Neither amendment passed. 

The challenge of working in the Legislature when the government has a minority is that the imperative to work across party lines is removed. The government does not need support of any other parties to pass its bills, and when opposition parties introduce or suggest amendments, they are easily dismissed.  

One of the many reasons we supported electoral reform is that a proportional electoral system will generally deliver minority governments, meaning that MLAs would have to work across party lines as a matter of course.  This would reduce the swings in policy making that we typically see, and create a more consensus-driven approach to legislation and decision-making.  

As elected representatives, we should always be striving to improve our democracy, our parliamentary practice, and our service to citizens and the province. 

 

As a caucus, we will continue to put forth solutions, amendments, private members bills, and ideas to government, with the hope and intention of showing that when we serve more collaboratively, we serve more effectively.  

______________________________

We are back in our constituencies this week, and I am looking forward to connecting with many of you to discuss issues in Cowichan. Last week, we met with the Cowichan Leadership Group to discuss a range of issues that we continue to work on across our jurisdiction, including housing, the opioid crisis, and missing and murdered Indigenous women and girls. Among other meetings this week, I will be discussion the mental health and housing plans in Cowichan. 

 

I am so proud of the work the BC Green Caucus and our constituency staff have done these past few weeks. We are a small and mighty team. I am sometimes astonished at the amount of work we can accomplish. It is a testament to their work ethic and their commitment to this work. 

 

 

Sonia Furstenau ... is the MLA for Cowichan Valley, and Leader of the BC Greens.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...
Post a Comment
Read more

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more