Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FURSTENAU -- Sick pay is long overdue for workers in BC, and while this bill is inadequate to meet the needs of people, it is a start.

 

This week in the BC Legislature the NDP government passed its legislation to implement a 3-day sick leave program for employees who are ill due to COVID-19, and who work for companies that don't have the capacity to offer sick leave. The legislation also gives the government the ability to implement, through regulation, a permanent sick leave program for the province.

Providing sick pay is long overdue for workers in BC, and while this bill is inadequate to meet the needs of people, it is a start.  

I introduced two amendments to the bill. The first proposed that government bring the permanent program back to the Legislature for review. The second amendment proposed to increase sick leave due to COVID-19 from the proposed 3 days to 5 days.  This would have gone further to bridge the gap between the provincial and federal programs.  

What I had hoped to achieve with the first amendment was to provide the government with the ability to present its plan for permanent sick pay in British Columbia to the Legislative Assembly, and have that plan sent for review to a committee that consists of members from all of the parties. 

Of course, as government has a majority, they would have the majority on that committee. However, it gives the opportunity for debate and the capacity for there to be the kinds of questions that we should all expect before legislation that passes in this House.

Neither amendment passed. 

The challenge of working in the Legislature when the government has a minority is that the imperative to work across party lines is removed. The government does not need support of any other parties to pass its bills, and when opposition parties introduce or suggest amendments, they are easily dismissed.  

One of the many reasons we supported electoral reform is that a proportional electoral system will generally deliver minority governments, meaning that MLAs would have to work across party lines as a matter of course.  This would reduce the swings in policy making that we typically see, and create a more consensus-driven approach to legislation and decision-making.  

As elected representatives, we should always be striving to improve our democracy, our parliamentary practice, and our service to citizens and the province. 

 

As a caucus, we will continue to put forth solutions, amendments, private members bills, and ideas to government, with the hope and intention of showing that when we serve more collaboratively, we serve more effectively.  

______________________________

We are back in our constituencies this week, and I am looking forward to connecting with many of you to discuss issues in Cowichan. Last week, we met with the Cowichan Leadership Group to discuss a range of issues that we continue to work on across our jurisdiction, including housing, the opioid crisis, and missing and murdered Indigenous women and girls. Among other meetings this week, I will be discussion the mental health and housing plans in Cowichan. 

 

I am so proud of the work the BC Green Caucus and our constituency staff have done these past few weeks. We are a small and mighty team. I am sometimes astonished at the amount of work we can accomplish. It is a testament to their work ethic and their commitment to this work. 

 

 

Sonia Furstenau ... is the MLA for Cowichan Valley, and Leader of the BC Greens.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more