Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

He was right ... he still is ... and yet the BC Liberals choose to take this money anyway. I hope they choke on it



The three main parties, filling their bank accounts with taxpayers money, all seem to believe it shouldn't be done.  So then why have NONE have decided decline this months windfall jackpot, that instead SHOULD BE GOING to health services, education, and other social services?



I've said it before, and I'll say it again; "Ideally only individuals should be able to donate up to a limit, similar to our federal system"



Instead, BC Liberals, NDP, and Green Party all headed to a taxpayer funded, and fully paid for, buffet. This from the Globe and Mail, in the Wednesday edition:



" ... British Columbia taxpayers just deposited $2.4-million into the bank accounts of the province's three main political parties — the first installment of a subsidy designed to wean them off corporate and union donations. The governing New Democrats and BC Liberals each received nearly $1-million, a contrast from traditional donations in which the Liberals significantly outraised the NDP. The third-place Greens got $415,000... "



After pointing this out, an occasional commenter, to my posts stated, "Well at least it's better than corporations and unions filling their coffers."



I DISAGREE, and said so.




Sorry Jeff but I strongly disagree. If individuals (not corporations) want to donate to a party (the amount within reason) fine. Government however should not be subsidizing parties.



Even if they do however, what about individuals running as independents?"  They get nothing.



Smaller parties with only a handful if candidates? They also get nothing?


This government largesse is only being shelled out to well funded and well entrenched parties, and it's crap!!



Back came Jeff stating, "I agree there shouldn't be subsidies too. But given a choice, it's better than having special interests giving you cash, who will later expect favors in return. Ideally only individual should be able to donate up to a limit, similar to our federal system."

But let's again come around to a brief comment I made above.



Who are the only ones to benefit, by becoming a pig at the trough, and therefore chowing down on taxpayer money?  It's only the big three -- the BC NDP ... the BC Liberals ... and the Green party.



BC Libertarians?  NOPE!

BC Conservatives?  NOPE



Any other parties?  NOPE.  Here's the thing however, I don't want them to get any taxpayer money either.



And again, what about candidates who are running as independents? 



Would they not have an even greater need for funds to allow them to cut through all the advertising messages of the major parties?  Who would have the hardest time getting their message out?  And, who would have the least amount of funds to run a campaign?



Independents!



So... it certainly looks like a wonderful system for the Liberals, NDP, and Greens.  As the only established parties, they are the only ones hitting a threshold high enough to get this money..



The BC NDP ... Liberals ... and Green parties will all get those millions.  NOT the education system ... children in care .... seniors ... health care system ... or those with physical and mental disabilities. 



Last Fall, Ralph Sultan, of the BC Liberals, stated, "It's a money grab on a scale which is neither casual nor minor."



He was right, and he still is.  Still, the BC Liberals choose to take this money anyway. 



I hope they choke on it.



In Kamloops., I'm Alan Forseth.  Got a comment to make?  This is your chance to share it now.

Comments

  1. I am sure if the other parties had fit the criteria they would have taken the money as well. On the other hand why should the BC conservatives deserve any money? They only got 80 delegates or so to there annual meeting and the executive denies membership to individuals such as former Conservative MPs. And no one gets a reason why they have been denied membership. So is the BC Conservatives really a political party?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Re-read my post Cal. I clearly stated I personally DO NOT beleive ANY party should be getting this money. It's a disgrace they have taken it!!

      Delete
    2. And YES, despite your obvious unhelpful sarcasm, BC Conservatives WILL be front and centre next election, and WILL play a strong role in leading the direction of the campaign

      Delete
  2. The public should not be required to subsidize any party or individual candidate; however, if the organized parties are entitled, independent and non-aligned candidates should also be entitled. It's easier and far less complicated to not provide subsidies to any of them.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH: Without a strong local presence, there is NO reason for anyone to tune in to local(?) radio

LOCAL HOMETOWN RADIO IS DYING … and without serious measures put in place, it will likely never see the light of day again. For well over four decades, the Canadian Radio and Television Commission (CRTC) has presided over its’ demise, and for that I say, “Shame”. Without out a word to say enough was enough, the CRTC has allowed corporate Canada to buy up one radio station after the other, and then allowed them to slash staff to the point where some so-called local radio stations do nothing more than air programming that originates from communities well outside the region in which they are located. Case in point?   On CHNL* 610 in Kamloops, the morning show hosted by Vinnie and Randi, DOES NOT originate from Kamloops -- it doesn’t even originate here in BC. It’s a program that Stingray airs across multiple radio stations in Western Canada. It doesn’t end there. Not only are Vinnie and Rando doing mornings on CHNL, but they also show up on sister station Country 103 … and of course o...

Conservative Economic Team Responds to Urgent Industry Concerns

 " For far too long, the BC NDP has ignored the economic challenges facing British Columbians. Manufacturing jobs are vanishing, forestry is in decline, and private sector employment growth has stagnated. Meanwhile, affordability has worsened for both families and businesses. British Columbians deserve better, and we’re here to deliver real solutions to rebuild our economy and create jobs that support everyday working people and their families ." – Gavin Dew, MLA and Shadow Minister for Jobs, Economy, Development, and Innovation.   December 3, 2024, Vancouver, BC – The Conservative economic team met today with business leaders and stakeholders to tackle critical issues impacting British Columbia’s economy. Attended by 9 critics from the Conservative Caucus, this meeting was convened by MLA Gavin Dew – Shadow Minister for Jobs, Economic Development, and Innovation - as a direct response to an October 30th open letter from seven of the province’s largest industry associations. ...

WARD STAMER -- We need certainly in our markets, and certainly in our fibre supply, before we no longer have a forest industry in this province

Image Government of BC I think we all realize that the threat of Trump’s 25% tariff is like other provocative statements he’s made in the past. That said, we should have reason to be concerned. Tariffs don’t benefit anyone. A tariff of that magnitude – included on our own softwood lumber exports, will make things more expensive for Americans, and cause friction in the supply chain. If imposed, a twenty-five percent tariff will be equally detrimental to the citizens and economy of the United States, as well as the people of BC. There are two things, however, of equal concern to the threat of punitive tariffs by incoming U.S. President-elect Donald Trump. One is our antiquated stumpage fees. It is a legacy from decades ago, and one incapable of responding to changing market conditions. We need to revamp our stumpage system to better reflect market conditions, and our economic costs. Instead, a value-added tax system will be instantly responsive to current market conditions and will encou...

Labels

Show more