Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

He was right ... he still is ... and yet the BC Liberals choose to take this money anyway. I hope they choke on it



The three main parties, filling their bank accounts with taxpayers money, all seem to believe it shouldn't be done.  So then why have NONE have decided decline this months windfall jackpot, that instead SHOULD BE GOING to health services, education, and other social services?



I've said it before, and I'll say it again; "Ideally only individuals should be able to donate up to a limit, similar to our federal system"



Instead, BC Liberals, NDP, and Green Party all headed to a taxpayer funded, and fully paid for, buffet. This from the Globe and Mail, in the Wednesday edition:



" ... British Columbia taxpayers just deposited $2.4-million into the bank accounts of the province's three main political parties — the first installment of a subsidy designed to wean them off corporate and union donations. The governing New Democrats and BC Liberals each received nearly $1-million, a contrast from traditional donations in which the Liberals significantly outraised the NDP. The third-place Greens got $415,000... "



After pointing this out, an occasional commenter, to my posts stated, "Well at least it's better than corporations and unions filling their coffers."



I DISAGREE, and said so.




Sorry Jeff but I strongly disagree. If individuals (not corporations) want to donate to a party (the amount within reason) fine. Government however should not be subsidizing parties.



Even if they do however, what about individuals running as independents?"  They get nothing.



Smaller parties with only a handful if candidates? They also get nothing?


This government largesse is only being shelled out to well funded and well entrenched parties, and it's crap!!



Back came Jeff stating, "I agree there shouldn't be subsidies too. But given a choice, it's better than having special interests giving you cash, who will later expect favors in return. Ideally only individual should be able to donate up to a limit, similar to our federal system."

But let's again come around to a brief comment I made above.



Who are the only ones to benefit, by becoming a pig at the trough, and therefore chowing down on taxpayer money?  It's only the big three -- the BC NDP ... the BC Liberals ... and the Green party.



BC Libertarians?  NOPE!

BC Conservatives?  NOPE



Any other parties?  NOPE.  Here's the thing however, I don't want them to get any taxpayer money either.



And again, what about candidates who are running as independents? 



Would they not have an even greater need for funds to allow them to cut through all the advertising messages of the major parties?  Who would have the hardest time getting their message out?  And, who would have the least amount of funds to run a campaign?



Independents!



So... it certainly looks like a wonderful system for the Liberals, NDP, and Greens.  As the only established parties, they are the only ones hitting a threshold high enough to get this money..



The BC NDP ... Liberals ... and Green parties will all get those millions.  NOT the education system ... children in care .... seniors ... health care system ... or those with physical and mental disabilities. 



Last Fall, Ralph Sultan, of the BC Liberals, stated, "It's a money grab on a scale which is neither casual nor minor."



He was right, and he still is.  Still, the BC Liberals choose to take this money anyway. 



I hope they choke on it.



In Kamloops., I'm Alan Forseth.  Got a comment to make?  This is your chance to share it now.

Comments

  1. I am sure if the other parties had fit the criteria they would have taken the money as well. On the other hand why should the BC conservatives deserve any money? They only got 80 delegates or so to there annual meeting and the executive denies membership to individuals such as former Conservative MPs. And no one gets a reason why they have been denied membership. So is the BC Conservatives really a political party?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Re-read my post Cal. I clearly stated I personally DO NOT beleive ANY party should be getting this money. It's a disgrace they have taken it!!

      Delete
    2. And YES, despite your obvious unhelpful sarcasm, BC Conservatives WILL be front and centre next election, and WILL play a strong role in leading the direction of the campaign

      Delete
  2. The public should not be required to subsidize any party or individual candidate; however, if the organized parties are entitled, independent and non-aligned candidates should also be entitled. It's easier and far less complicated to not provide subsidies to any of them.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more