Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’

According to Stamer, that should already have been done.

“Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer. 

“If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?”

Stamer indicated two years have been wasted, and went on to say, “I had conversations with engineers two weeks after the bridge was destroyed and asked, ‘How long do you think it would take to build that bridge?’ They said, oh, minimum of five years.”

I said, "Do you mean to tell me there's not another bridge anywhere in the world that you couldn't just put in there?" And the response was, ‘Oh, there probably is. But, you know, they gave us a bunch of reason why they wouldn't.’

“At this rate, it's going to be 10 years. Like seriously, no one at the Ministry of Transportation and Transit really wants to pick up the ball and do anything to move this thing forward.”

Regarding any studies, Stamer had this to say; “It should already be done, or at least the archaeological section of it should have been done to see what the negative impacts would be in replacing that bridge, and what's there and what's not there.”

According to Stamer the Ministry of Transportation and Transit should already be trying to determine what would be suitable for a new span.

“Is it going to be multi-support, single-support, free support, have nothing in the river at all? We should already be halfway along that process and looking at what exactly is needed and when the tendering process would start.

I understand that MoTT is currently doing a traffic impact study, and my question is; ‘When will that be completed. The way they're dragging their feet on this it’s going to be like the Massey Tunnel -- it'll be 25 years.”

Stamer continued, “I think money is tight. And yeah, I think that with all the different levels of input that is now required, in any of these projects, that not only does it take an incredible amount of time, but it takes an incredible amount of money to get through the processes.”

“That's fine. But you should be able to be designing the bridge, but here’s the reality. This government hasn't made it a priority and it's up to all of all of us; First Nations, Kamloops City Council, along with provincial representatives like Peter and myself – to push as hard as we can.”

“People want to see the Red Bridge rebuilt, sooner than this government appears to want to see it done, and Peter and I will continue to advocate on behalf of the people in Kamloops to see that happen”, Stamer concluded.

 

Labels:

Comments

  1. AnonymousApril 4, 2026 at 12:03 PM

    The bureaucracy n policy people creating their own monastery with these nonsense timeframes one year max should b done and complete n come right across over the rail yard tracks

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 
Post a Comment
Read more

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more