Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

DAN ALBAS: Jail Not Bail -- The bill that could change how Canada handles violent offenders

This week in Ottawa, yet another private member’s bill became the focus of considerable attention. This time, it was Bill C‑242, known as the Jail Not Bail Act, introduced by Conservative MP Arpan Khanna, who represents Oxford, Ontario.

For those who attended my recent crime forum in Kelowna, MP Khanna participated as a guest, taking the time to listen directly to the serious concerns residents raised about crime in our community. The issue of repeat violent offenders being released only to re‑offend is not abstract—it is a reality that many families and businesses here in Kelowna are confronting.

I have met with the City of Kelowna on this matter, which has clearly documented the significant and growing impact this problem is having locally. Similar concerns are being raised by residents and local leaders in communities across my riding.

It is also important to recognize how we arrived at this point. In 2018, the Trudeau Liberal government passed Bill C‑75, amending the Criminal Code and fundamentally reshaping Canada’s bail system. Among its changes was the entrenchment of the so‑called “principle of restraint,” directing courts to release accused persons at the earliest reasonable opportunity and on the least onerous conditions possible.

While judicial discretion remains, this legislative shift made automatic release the starting point rather than public safety. That decision lies at the heart of what many Canadians now recognize as a catch‑and‑release justice system.

The consequences have been serious. Since 2015, violent crime has risen significantly across Canada. Homicides have increased, gang‑related killings have surged, and violent gun crime has climbed sharply. These are not just statistics—they represent real victims and real communities paying the price.

Bill C‑242, the Jail Not Bail Act, proposes a clear course correction. The bill would restrict bail for repeat violent offenders, reversing the Liberals’ ideological approach by making public safety the primary consideration in bail decisions, rather than automatic release.

The legislation also expands reverse‑onus provisions, requiring individuals charged with serious violent offences to demonstrate why they should be released, instead of forcing communities to bear the risk by default. Judges would retain discretion, but the law would once again prioritize the safety of the public.

Most importantly, Bill C‑242 would repeal the rigid interpretation of the “principle of restraint” introduced under Bill C‑75, restoring balance, accountability, and common sense to Canada’s bail system.

No one should fear that a person charged with a violent offence will be back on the street before the ink is dry on the paperwork. Canadians deserve a justice system that puts law‑abiding citizens first.

My question this week is straightforward: Do you think the Liberal Government should support Bill C-242, the “Jail Not Bail Act”?

I invite you to share your thoughts and join the discussion on my Facebook page. Alternatively, you can reach me directly at Dan.Albas@parl.gc.ca, or toll‑free at 1‑800‑665‑8711. 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...
Post a Comment
Read more

US Tribes Using DRIPA to Expand Influence in British Columbia

The BC Conservatives are sounding the alarm after receiving multiple filings in the BC Supreme Court in which U.S.-based Indigenous tribes are relying on DRIPA, UNDRIP, and the Interpretation Act to assert greater recognition of Aboriginal rights and direct involvement in British Columbia affairs. “This is a clear and growing sovereignty crisis,” said Scott McInnis, Critic for Indigenous Relations. “The Premier himself has referred to the DRIPA situation as an existential threat to British Columbia, and has said amendments are non‑negotiable. We are now seeing exactly why.” Court cases reveal that American tribes are attempting to leverage DRIPA to gain standing and influence inside BC. “It is becoming increasingly clear that DRIPA is being weaponized in ways never transparently disclosed to British Columbians,” McInnis said. “Allowing U.S. tribes to expand their reach into BC governance is deeply concerning and completely unacceptable.” One notable case, brought by a group of Alaskan ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Seniors Waiting Years for Care: New Data Exposes Growing Long-Term Care Crisis in BC

Image Credit: Seniors Advocate BC     “ Eight years. That is not a wait time. That is a system failur e” Seniors in British Columbia are now waiting years, not months, for access to long-term care, according to figures confirmed during Health Estimates this week. Brennan Day, MLA for Courtenay-Comox and Critic for Rural Health and Seniors’ Health, says the numbers paint a clear picture of a system falling behind the needs of a rapidly aging population. “Yesterday, after repeated questioning, the Minister finally confirmed that 7,829 seniors are currently waiting for long-term care in British Columbia,” said Day. “That’s an 11 percent increase in just one year.” The delays are not measured in weeks, they are measured in years. Across the province, average wait times now exceed a year in many regions. In Vancouver Coastal Health, the maximum wait time has reached 2,825 days, nearly eight years. “Eight years,” said Day. “That is not a wait time. That is a system failure.” At...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more