Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Conservative MLA Kiel Giddens: Cost overruns on capital projects have grown to more than $17 billion and are a combined 158 years behind schedule

IMAGE CREDIT:  Prince George Citizen 

Kiel Giddens, MLA for Prince George-Mackenzie and Critic for Labour, has introduced the Public Sector Construction Projects Procurement Act, legislation aimed at ensuring publicly funded construction contracts are awarded through labour-neutral, merit-based procurement.

“Here’s the simple question: if labour shortages are driving cost overruns, why would government limit who can work on public projects?” said Giddens. “Public infrastructure belongs to all of us. The opportunity to build it should be open to every qualified worker and contractor.”

Giddens says restrictive tendering rules introduced by the NDP in 2018 through CBA’s and restrictive project labour agreements have reduced competition on many public sector capital projects by limiting who can bid based on labour affiliation. Since the NDP introduced restrictive tendering, he notes that cost overruns on capital projects have grown to more than $17 billion and are a combined 158 years behind schedule.

“At a time when families have to think carefully about every dollar, government should think like a taxpayer too,” said Giddens. “When competition is restricted, taxpayers lose. When procurement is open and fair, communities get better value and stronger accountability.”

The bill would require labour-neutral procurement for publicly funded construction projects by prohibiting public sector entities from issuing construction solicitations that require union-only labour or require a contractor to enter a specific collective agreement as a condition of bidding. It would also prevent any future government from imposing non-union-only requirements.

“The principle is straightforward: contracts should be awarded based on merit, on safety record, qualifications, experience, price, and the ability to deliver results, not a preferred labour affiliation,” said Giddens. “This is fairness for workers, because whether someone joins a particular union is their decision. And it’s fairness for taxpayers, because more competition means better value.”

“We value the important contributions of all workers, whatever their choice of union or open shop workplace,” said Giddens. “Open tendering will help deliver the schools, hospitals, bridges, and roads British Columbians are waiting for, while respecting worker choice and protecting public dollars.”   

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...
Post a Comment
Read more

US Tribes Using DRIPA to Expand Influence in British Columbia

The BC Conservatives are sounding the alarm after receiving multiple filings in the BC Supreme Court in which U.S.-based Indigenous tribes are relying on DRIPA, UNDRIP, and the Interpretation Act to assert greater recognition of Aboriginal rights and direct involvement in British Columbia affairs. “This is a clear and growing sovereignty crisis,” said Scott McInnis, Critic for Indigenous Relations. “The Premier himself has referred to the DRIPA situation as an existential threat to British Columbia, and has said amendments are non‑negotiable. We are now seeing exactly why.” Court cases reveal that American tribes are attempting to leverage DRIPA to gain standing and influence inside BC. “It is becoming increasingly clear that DRIPA is being weaponized in ways never transparently disclosed to British Columbians,” McInnis said. “Allowing U.S. tribes to expand their reach into BC governance is deeply concerning and completely unacceptable.” One notable case, brought by a group of Alaskan ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Seniors Waiting Years for Care: New Data Exposes Growing Long-Term Care Crisis in BC

Image Credit: Seniors Advocate BC     “ Eight years. That is not a wait time. That is a system failur e” Seniors in British Columbia are now waiting years, not months, for access to long-term care, according to figures confirmed during Health Estimates this week. Brennan Day, MLA for Courtenay-Comox and Critic for Rural Health and Seniors’ Health, says the numbers paint a clear picture of a system falling behind the needs of a rapidly aging population. “Yesterday, after repeated questioning, the Minister finally confirmed that 7,829 seniors are currently waiting for long-term care in British Columbia,” said Day. “That’s an 11 percent increase in just one year.” The delays are not measured in weeks, they are measured in years. Across the province, average wait times now exceed a year in many regions. In Vancouver Coastal Health, the maximum wait time has reached 2,825 days, nearly eight years. “Eight years,” said Day. “That is not a wait time. That is a system failure.” At...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more