Her
win was all but guaranteed as the area has been a strong anti-NDP
stronghold for generations. When Kevin Falcon folded the BC United
Party up and packed it in Armstrong has no competition on the right.
Independent Kevin Kraft, formerly of BC United, had no official banner
to run under and he pulled in a measly 6.5% of the vote.
The brief history
That
all changed when the party expelled Dallas Brodie early in 2025 for her
belittling comments on the survivors of Residential School. Her
comments were considered so off putting and inappropriate that the BC
Conservatives didn't even want her. New Democrats might smarmily
declare that the bar has to be pretty high for them to toss out a member
for such an infraction.
This
is when everything changed. Armstrong and fellow MLA Jordan Kealy both
left the party in protest. Kealy made the good call to sit as an
independent. Brodie and Armstrong formed the One BC party and took
advantage of Legislature rules making Armstrong the party whip and house
leader. Brodie was the party leader. They had official status and a
budget.
Without
going into to many details One BC under Brodie spent 2025 engaging in
the art of performance politics. Her antics and managerial style
resulted in the party having an internal coup, Brodie being kicked out
as leader, and then her retaking the party back over and Armstrong
leaving.
This
bring us to 2026 where Tara Armstrong, independent MLA, has taken
Brodie's disruption antics and games to a whole new level.
Tara Armstrong and recall today
Her
days in the legislature are about social issues such as transgender
people, First Nations, and now the BC Human Rights Code. What she
doesn't advocate on is investment in her riding, housing health care,
education, taxes, or any of the so-called kitchen table issues facing
her constituents.
When she was elected, she was elected as a B.C. Conservative. She platformed on affordability, health care, supporting seniors and people with disabilities … and when she got elected, she went on a totally different road. ~~ Wilbur Turner
Turner
makes a reasonable case for recall this time which is different from
cases we've previously had or those we see unfolding in Alberta today.
This case isn't about a single flashpoint issue or a scandal.
She isn't doing the job she was hired to do
It
is about her on the job performance not meeting the expectations of the
voters. Armstrong hasn't fallen short by a little either. She's
completely ignored the issues she campaigned on and abandoned her
voters. That's a different situation.
I
think the comparison to anyone in any other field of employment
conducting themselves as she has on the job is valid. Say you hire
someone to stock shelves, sweep the floor, and carry out heavy stuff for
shoppers in your store. That person does the job but then one day
stops doing those tasks. Instead they are trying to sell customers TV
sets despite you having a sales staff, they talk to the cashiers, and
when shelves are empty you find them on the floor rearranging displays.
That's
Tara Armstrong today. She is an MLA and she is being political but
she's not doing the job she was elected to do. In the case of the
employee earlier, you'd fire them if they didn't buckle down and get the
job done.
Tara Armstrong either needs to start doing her job, or she needs to be fired.
Is that not reasonable?
Is
it not reasonable that voters in a riding should be able to recall
their elected official if they aren't do the job the campaigned on?
Had Armstrong switched parties to the NDP those on the right would be saying, nay, demanding that she run in a by-election. Polling data shows that a majority of Canadians do support by-elections for floor crossers. I'm not one of those in support of that, but I do think that not doing the job is valid reason. That reason should be accepted by everyone regardless if they are right, centrist, or left wing. If you aren't doing the job you said you would then you don't deserve to have that job.
Had Armstrong switched parties to the NDP those on the right would be saying, nay, demanding that she run in a by-election. Polling data shows that a majority of Canadians do support by-elections for floor crossers. I'm not one of those in support of that, but I do think that not doing the job is valid reason. That reason should be accepted by everyone regardless if they are right, centrist, or left wing. If you aren't doing the job you said you would then you don't deserve to have that job.
Recall in this instance is reasonable.


Comments
Post a Comment