Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT: Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press.


I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place.

There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing.

I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative.

To tell you the truth, I really don’t care!

Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservative to be the leader --- that I DO care about! 

I care very much about the future of our province.  In fact, from a very early age when I became politically active at the age of 14, it’s something I have always cared about.  First for myself, then my children, and now for my grandchildren as well.

At the ripe old age of 70, there is one thing that is virtually guaranteed come election time. One-third of the vote will go left – one third of the vote will go right – and then there one third of the vote that are basically centrists.  Whoever wants to take to the reins of power in the BC legislature MUST capture more of the centrist vote than the other does.  

That’s a FACT which no one can argue with.

So back to the leadership candidates, and their ‘purity’ tests.

Drop it – stop now – and quit making people who are considering supporting our party second guess themselves.

In no particular order, here is what I believe the over-whelming majority of British Columbians are concerned about:

1.    Their safety, and the safety of their family members;

2.    Having a job that allows them to be comfortable, even if not particularly well-off;

3.    They want a home in a neighbourhood where gangland violence doesn’t take place, where gunshots don’t ring out, and where drugs aren’t being dealt on street corners;

4.    They want those suffering from mental health issues, and addiction, able to readily seek help when it’s needed; not weeks or months down the road;

5.    They want to keep more of the money they earn in their pockets, not the pockets of government;

6.    They want their children to feel like they have a future right here in BC, not in neighbouring Alberta, or further east;

7.    They want an education system where their children can learn what will help them be successful in the future;

8.    They want a healthcare system that will be there when they need it – not an hour or two down the road because the local ER or maternity department is closed 
… and …

9.  They want a government that spends their tax-dollars wisely.

So, to those pushing harder to the right I ask this question; “Where do the things I just mentioned fit with in your plan of right-wing conservative purity”, because in my honest opinion, they simply do not.

NOT, if you want to become government.

We already have one Dallas Brodie, and we most certainly do not need a second, or even a slightly watered down version.

To the leadership candidates … Bruce Banman, Harman Bhangu, Iain Black, Caroline Elliott, Kerry-Lynne Findlay, Yuri Fulmer, Warren Hamm, Darrell Jones, and Peter Milobar ... focus on the nine things that I mentioned.

That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election with a majority government. And that’s what will allow our province to prosper once again.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more