RE: Proposed Heritage Conservation Act changes won’t shift financial burden landowners (Castanet – March 25th, 2026)
This is a perfect example of how
out of touch the government is with people on the ground.
You’ve got situations where a
homeowner can suddenly be hit with massive costs because something is found on
their property that they had nothing to do with. And honestly, Tk̓emlúps te Secwépemc Chief Rosanne Casimir is right
on that point, if the burden stays on the landowner, people are going to think
twice before reporting anything.
That’s just reality.
Then the government turns around
and says they’re “streamlining” things with fewer permits and faster timelines.
That sounds good on paper, but it completely misses the point. The government
is tweaking the process to make it smoother, but they’re not fixing the biggest
issue, property owners still carry the risk, the cost, and the uncertainty.
So, what’s actually changed?
You’ve got a slightly faster
process, but the same financial hit, the same lack of clarity, and the same
risk of being locked out of your own property. That’s not a solution, that’s
just repackaging the problem.
Where is the common sense here?
If you want people to do the
right thing and report findings, you can’t punish them for it. All this does is
create more hesitation, more frustration, and more division on something that
should be handled openly and transparently.
Instead of fixing the root
issue, they’re dressing it up and calling it progress, and people are the ones
left dealing with the consequences.
Mike Riggs ... is a contractor, and the father of two disabled daughters. He values hard work, real world perspective, and speaking common sense.

Comments
Post a Comment