Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

US Tribes Using DRIPA to Expand Influence in British Columbia


The BC Conservatives are sounding the alarm after receiving multiple filings in the BC Supreme Court in which U.S.-based Indigenous tribes are relying on DRIPA, UNDRIP, and the Interpretation Act to assert greater recognition of Aboriginal rights and direct involvement in British Columbia affairs.

“This is a clear and growing sovereignty crisis,” said Scott McInnis, Critic for Indigenous Relations. “The Premier himself has referred to the DRIPA situation as an existential threat to British Columbia, and has said amendments are non‑negotiable. We are now seeing exactly why.”

Court cases reveal that American tribes are attempting to leverage DRIPA to gain standing and influence inside BC.

“It is becoming increasingly clear that DRIPA is being weaponized in ways never transparently disclosed to British Columbians,” McInnis said. “Allowing U.S. tribes to expand their reach into BC governance is deeply concerning and completely unacceptable.”

One notable case, brought by a group of Alaskan tribes, alleges insufficient consultation on the Eskay Creek Gold Mine in northwestern BC under the existing Section 7 DRIPA agreement between the NDP government and the Tahltan Nation.

“The obvious question is this,” McInnis said. “If an Alaskan tribe is granted the same legal status as a BC First Nation under DRIPA, will they then claim entitlement to BC mining revenues and provincial tax dollars? This government has no answer.”

The BC Conservatives are calling for the immediate repeal of DRIPA and the Interpretation Amendment Act to halt the escalating legal uncertainty.

“If this is not grounds for repeal, amendment, or suspension, I don’t know what is,” said McInnis. “DRIPA now threatens provincial and national sovereignty, while forcing BC First Nations into an untenable position, where their legal standing is equated with that of U.S. tribes.”

This follows another serious case involving the Sinixt Confederacy, a US-based group seeking, and being granted, respondent status in litigation aimed at disrupting a critical mineral project in the B.C. Interior. The province voluntarily consented to the Sinixt’s participation.

“That decision was either deliberate or a stunning display of incompetence,” McInnis said. “There was no requirement to include a U.S. tribe, yet the government opened the door anyway.”

The proposed interior magnesium mine, co-developed by West High Yield Resources and the Osoyoos Indian Band, is now caught in the crossfire. OIB Chief Clarence Louie raised serious concerns directly with the Attorney General in March 2026, stating this outcome is “the furthest thing possible from placing the interests of BC First Nations as the priority and primary focus.”

The BC Conservatives are demanding immediate action from the NDP government to neutralize DRIPA’s legal effects.

“If the government fails to act now, British Columbia risks permanently surrendering control over its resources, its legal processes, and its sovereignty to foreign interests,” McInnis concluded. “This cannot be allowed to continue.” 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more