Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Opposition moves reasoned amendment on K’ómoks Treaty Act, calls for committee study of overlap and process concerns

IMAGE CREDIT -- Premier David Eby (Facebook)

Yesterday (May 20th) the Official Opposition attempted to move a reasoned amendment to the second reading of Bill 20, the K'ómoks Treaty Act, 2026, that would refer the subject matter to the Select Standing Committee on Aboriginal Affairs before the Legislature proceeded further. The amendment was voted down by the NDP government.  

The amendment asks the House to pause the treaty ratification until the committee has examined, in public, overlap issues raised by neighbouring First Nations, the substantive changes the government made between the publicly-released Agreement-in-Principle and the final Treaty, and the implications for British Columbians.  

"Modern treaties are supposed to bring certainty. That is the whole point," said Scott McInnis, MLA for Columbia River Revelstoke and Official Opposition Critic for Indigenous Relations. 

“This Treaty inserts UNDRIP as an authoritative source for its own interpretation, locks in consent-based decision-making, and does it on top of overlapping claims that neighbouring First Nations say have never been resolved. That is a recipe for legal uncertainty for years to come — and legal uncertainty in this province means investment frozen, projects stalled, and jobs lost."

“The government has had this Treaty in front of it for years. We have had it for weeks," said McInnis. 

"There are documented overlap concerns from neighbouring nations. There are co-management provisions inserted at Stage Five that appear in no prior Canadian treaty and were not in the Agreement-in-Principle the public was consulted on. The standing committee exists for exactly this work."

"Reconciliation has to be built to last, and it needs to reach a conclusion," said John Rustad, MLA for Nechako Lakes and Joint-Indigenous Relations Critic. 

"A treaty that leaves neighbouring First Nations with unresolved overlap claims isn't a finished agreement; it's the next decade of litigation waiting to happen. The communities, the families and the businesses living within this territory deserve certainty, and so does K'ómoks. Our amendment asked the government to do the work now, in public, through the committee, so that what comes out the other side is durable. That is what real reconciliation looks like."   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

Labels

Show more