Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

WARD STAMER: Forest workers aren’t asking for special treatment. They’re asking for a government that understands forestry is a way of life in BC


British Columbia’s forest industry has long been one of the pillars of our provincial economy. For generations, forestry has provided stable employment, supported rural communities and helped build the economic foundation of this province.

From communities like Prince George, Quesnel, Williams Lake and Kamloops, the forest sector has supported families for decades. These are communities where forestry is not simply an industry, it’s the economic heartbeat of a region.

But today that heartbeat is weakening. Across British Columbia we are witnessing a troubling pattern of mill curtailments, permanent closures and layoffs. Families who have worked in forestry for generations now face uncertainty about their future. Entire communities are feeling the economic consequences.

In communities such as Houston and Merritt, 100 Mile House and Crofton, mill closures have had devastating ripple effects. When a mill shuts down, it impacts far more than the workers inside that facility. Truck drivers, logging contractors, equipment operators, mechanics, small business owners and their workers all suffer the loss. And that ripple spreads across the entire community.

And yet many in this industry feel that their concerns have not been heard by this current government.

Instead of providing certainty and stability for the forest sector, government decisions have created growing uncertainty.

Policy announcements have often come without meaningful consultation with the workers and communities that depend on forestry for their livelihoods.

Companies need long-term certainty to invest in modern mills, new technology and workforce stability. Unfortunately, the regulatory environment today has made those investments far more difficult.

We are also facing serious challenges relating to timber supply. The impacts of the mountain pine beetle epidemic, and the increasing severity of our wildfire seasons, have dramatically reduced fibre in many parts of BC. Yet rather than implementing strong and proactive forest management strategies, this government has too often allowed uncertainty and delay to dominate the conversation.

Active forest management, including responsible harvesting, reforestation and improved wildfire mitigation, is essential to maintaining a sustained forest sector. Instead, industry and communities are often left navigating lengthy permitting processes and unclear policy direction.

Forest workers are not asking for special treatment. They are asking for common sense. They’re asking for a government that understands that forestry is not just an industry, it’s a way of life in British Columbia.

The reality is that forestry remains one of BC’s most important economic drivers. It supports thousands of jobs and generates billions of dollars in economic activity every single year.

Our lumber producers and products are recognized around the world for their quality and sustainability. British Columbia already has some of the highest standards in the world, but current policies continue to push investment away from the province and we risk losing more mills, more jobs and more opportunities for our communities.

BC deserves better. Forestry helped build this province. It built our towns, our infrastructure, our economies. People that work in this industry deserve to know that their government supports them and understands the importance of their work every single day.

At the end of the day, we are left with a very clear choice. We can either have significant change in forest policies from this government, policies that support timber supply, investment and active forest management, or British Columbians may soon be calling for something else: a change in government.

If this government cannot recognize the importance of this important industry, and the communities that depend on it, then it is those communities that will ultimately demand the leadership that will.

Forest workers, their families and communities across British Columbia deserve better.


The video of Ward's statement, from this morning (March 9th) can be found by clicking the following link:


Ward Stamer is MLA for Kamloops – North Thompson, and forestry critic for the Conservative Party of BC.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more