Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

British Columbians Strongly Support Protecting Private Property: Poll

A new poll finds that 78% of British Columbians say the BC Supreme Court’s Cowichan decision will hurt BC’s economy by undermining property rights. The decision granted Aboriginal title over approximately 800 acres of private land in Richmond – including farms, small businesses, and individual homes. Opposition crosses every region and every political party.

The poll was commissioned by the Independent Contractors and Businesses Association (ICBA), Canada’s largest construction association.

According to the poll, the Cowichan decision has heightened concerns about private property not just in Richmond, but across BC.

“Farmers, ranchers, small businesses and homeowners are struggling to understand the implications of this decision on land values, on when, and how, they can sell their properties, and on how projects get approved – there is a real risk that if the Government is not clear on its policy approach and what all of this means, BC will become uninvestable,” said Chris Gardner, ICBA President and CEO.

The poll’s findings
paint a clear picture:

  • 80% of British Columbians believe that governments must protect private property
  • 75% believe that it is not fair for the Courts to change the rules around property ownership
  • 78% of British Columbians say the Cowichan decision will hurt BC’s economy by undermining property rights certainty
  • 78% do not believe that First Nations should be given a veto over development projects in their traditional territories – including 69% of NDP core voters and 82% of swing voters
  • 73% believe private property ownership in BC is now uncertain, including 58% of NDP core voters
  • 90% of British Columbians believe that people fighting to protect private property are not motivated by racism

"These numbers tell a simple story: British Columbians understand that when courts can change the rules and hand rights to your land or your home you worked so hard for, to someone else in a trial you didn't know was happening, something is going badly wrong," said Gardner, noting Montrose Properties, a large landowner in the Cowichan/Richmond lands, was not notified of the court proceedings

"This isn't a partisan issue, there’s a strong consensus that cuts across every region, every age group, and every political party.”

“The strength of our democracy is respectful and robust debate on a wide range of issues that results in policies that are fair and strike the right balance,” said Gardner. 

“Getting economic reconciliation right is the key to our long-term prosperity, so it is imperative that Premier Eby engage all British Columbians in an open and transparent discussion on how we can work together to build shared prosperity.”

ICBA is calling on the Eby Government to:
repeal the flawed Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (DRIPA); repeal Section 8.1.3 of the Interpretation Act that directs every law in BC be made consistent with a United Nations Declaration; reinvigorate the treaty process to deliver clarity, certainty and finality with First Nations; legislate clear protections for fee-simple private property rights; and do all of this transparently, and with greater public engagement.

“By doing otherwise, Premier Eby risks undermining the broad public support for economic reconciliation and sowing division, uncertainty and confusion where there should be none,” said Gardner.

 

The full poll results are available HERE.

 

Survey Methodology: One Persuades surveyed 1,005 B.C. adults online, February 21–24, 2026, using a nationally representative panel. Margin of error ±3.1 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. Results weighted by age, gender, region, language, and past provincial vote (Statistics Canada).


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more