Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FORSETH -- We are NO LONGER the wild west, as Meadus called it, when it comes to public fiascos

This morning, I shared information regarding a new Mainstreet Research poll of BC Conservative members that shows two candidates are basically neck-and-neck in support to become the next leader of the party.

The poll shows Caroline Elliott with 21.2 percent support, closely followed by Peter Milobar at 20.8 percent. Iain Black, in this poll, is a distant third with just 8.4 percent support.

After seeing and reading the story, Chelsea Meadus had this to say:

The weighted vote means it really might not matter who is popular. The 3rd place winner could win as leader; that’s how Andrew Wilkinson won. If this vote goes three rounds. People need to understand how the vote works. 

For me the most important factor is someone who currently is NOT an MLA. The infighting and lack of unity requires an outsider. The lack of training is really impacting some riding’s. Some of these new MLAs have no idea what they are doing, and nobody is noticing except their voters.

Someone who is already in the party could have repaired this by now, and that has not happened. How could that person suddenly get the respect from their colleagues they don’t already have?

I’m open to someone explaining how I’m wrong on the above statement.

This party is a coalition. There are MLAs who vote more Liberal; just look at the votes where people can vote their conscience. The leader is going to need to manage that and put in place a set of values that MLAs need to agree to, to form an understanding voters can depend on. Right now, it
s the Wild West, zero consistency.


Sorry Chelsea, but I have to disagree.

In the months since former leader John Rustad stepped down, we have seen strong caucus unity, they have remained focused on presenting clear and concise policy alternatives to what is coming from David Eby's NDP government, AND there has been NO public squabbling.

In her comment, Chelsea stated that, “Someone who is already in the party could have repaired this by now, and that has not happened.”

I have to assume that she is referring to Peter Milobar, who is the only remaining MLA in the leadership race, after four others dropped out. Her belief does not seem to resonate with party members as this Mainstreet poll also showed that when asked who is best to unify the party and defeat the NDP, Milobar leads at 30.6% vs. Elliott's 26.0%.

I for one am proud of the work our Conservative Party of BC caucus is doing.  They ARE showing the people of BC we now have a viable option to the disaster we currently face under NDP Premier David Eby’s government.

With that in mind, there should be NO reason why that would not continue with the only current MLA still seeking the party's leadership – Peter Milobar -- if that is what members choose.

We are NO LONGER the wild west, as Meadus called it, when it comes to public fiascos. Thank goodness for that!

And a big thank you thank you needs to go out to Interim Leader Trevor Halford,
for his work in ensuring we have caucus unity, and consistency in our messaging
.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more